Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 104 to paragraph 13

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 104 to paragraph 13
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
356 for · 229 against · 86 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 12:55
More facts (6)
Position
vote 42 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 13 – Am 104
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0151
Dossier
2025/2565(RSP)
Vote id
172709
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 356 for, 229 against, 86 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 53 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 5Against 37Abst. 2No vote 2 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
GreensFor 0Against 43Abst. 5No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.84
S&DFor 11Against 117Abst. 4No vote 4 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.83
RenewFor 65Against 4Abst. 0No vote 6 of 75Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
EPPFor 174Against 1Abst. 0No vote 13 of 188Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 70Against 0Abst. 1No vote 9 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 24Against 5Abst. 52No vote 5 of 86Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.46
ESNFor 4Against 2Abst. 18No vote 2 of 26Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.63
No groupFor 3Against 20Abst. 4No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Cyprus010
Germany040
Denmark100
Spain040
Finland300
France080
Greece040
Ireland030
Italy090
Netherlands100
Portugal020
Sweden002

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 671 members

No vote recorded, 48

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 48 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
1 Apr 2025Amendment 7 — part 4 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment423 for, 232 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 630 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 2 — part 2 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Split vote321 for, 219 against, 66 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.85 572 voters
18 Jun 2026Final vote — text as a whole Political repression and humanitarian situation in CubaFinal283 for, 199 against, 85 abstained Adopted For 50 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.85 518 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí NavarroFinal374 for, 198 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.84 546 voters
23 Jan 2025Paragraph 5 — part 2 Situation in Venezuela following the usurpation of the presidency on 10 January 2025Split vote322 for, 249 against, 36 abstained Adopted For 53 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.83 575 voters
22 Jan 2025Amendments 4 + 7 (voted as one) to paragraph 19 Need for actions to address the continued oppression and fake elections in BelarusAmendment429 for, 205 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.82 615 voters
28 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2024Final377 for, 254 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 57 %r · shared0.82 611 voters
18 Jun 2026Recital B — part 2 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and FinlandSplit vote341 for, 180 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 63 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.81 497 voters
19 Sept 2024Final vote — text as a whole Situation in VenezuelaFinal309 for, 201 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 59 %Requested by EPP, The Leftr · shared0.81 489 voters
1 Apr 2025Amendment 7 — part 2 Macro-financial assistance to EgyptAmendment443 for, 226 against, 0 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 626 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172709
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 104 to paragraph 13 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172709, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172709 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172709,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 104 to paragraph 13 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172709}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172709},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172709, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}