Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 102 to paragraph 1

White paper on the future of European defence

Vote
Amendment 102 to paragraph 1
Decision
No. 6 of the sitting of 12 Mar 2025
Result
94 for · 533 against · 49 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
12 March 2025, 12:47
More facts (6)
Position
vote 4 of 194 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
RC-B10-0146/2025/REV1 – § 1 – Am 102
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0151
Dossier
2025/2565(RSP)
Vote id
172667
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 94 for, 533 against, 49 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 14 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 40Abst. 3No vote 3 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
GreensFor 0Against 51Abst. 0No vote 2 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 1Against 130Abst. 2No vote 3 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 1Against 69Abst. 0No vote 5 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 1Against 171Abst. 3No vote 13 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.97
ECRFor 65Against 3Abst. 3No vote 9 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
PatriotsFor 21Against 44Abst. 17No vote 4 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.30
ESNFor 3Against 5Abst. 16No vote 2 of 26Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.50
No groupFor 2Against 20Abst. 5No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria003
Czechia010
Germany0111
France010
Hungary001
Lithuania001
Poland300
Slovakia020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 676 members

No vote recorded, 43

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 43 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 125 to paragraph 9 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Amendment90 for, 534 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.81 631 voters
3 Apr 2025Amendment 11 to paragraph 6 Energy-intensive industriesAmendment112 for, 454 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.79 580 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 5 to citation 4 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaAmendment145 for, 489 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.78 610 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 Jan 2026Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 10 The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companiesAmendment135 for, 471 against, 52 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.77 615 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 70, adding text after recital R — part 2 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment137 for, 440 against, 61 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.77 605 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 92, adding text after paragraph 56 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment153 for, 467 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.76 619 voters
30 Apr 2026Amendment 9 to paragraph 2 Enforcement of the Digital Markets ActAmendment136 for, 401 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.76 540 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 94, adding text after paragraph 88 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment117 for, 489 against, 65 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.75 620 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 10 Banking Union – annual report 2024Amendment134 for, 365 against, 50 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.74 520 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendment 308 to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment114 for, 522 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.74 609 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172667
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 102 to paragraph 1 — White paper on the future of European defence”. Vote, 12 March 2025. votingId 172667, reference 2025/2565(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172667 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 12 March 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-03-12/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-03-12-172667,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 102 to paragraph 1 — White paper on the future of European defence}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-03-12},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172667}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-03-12/172667},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 172667, reference 2025/2565(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-03-12-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-03-12 (CC BY 4.0)}
}