Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 11 to paragraph 6

Energy-intensive industries

Vote
Amendment 11 to paragraph 6
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 3 Apr 2025
Result
112 for · 454 against · 49 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
3 April 2025, 13:30
More facts (6)
Position
vote 16 of 50 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: ECR
Official label
B10-0209/2025 - § 6 - Am 11
Text
Motion B-10-2025-0209
Dossier
2025/2536(RSP)
Vote id
174663
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 112 for, 454 against, 49 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 18 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 38Abst. 0No vote 8 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 50Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 115Abst. 1No vote 20 of 136Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 4Against 58Abst. 4No vote 9 of 75Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
EPPFor 3Against 153Abst. 3No vote 29 of 188Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 66Against 0Abst. 0No vote 14 of 80Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 27Against 32Abst. 16No vote 11 of 86Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.14
ESNFor 2Against 2Abst. 20No vote 2 of 26Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.75
No groupFor 10Against 6Abst. 5No vote 7 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Fernand KARTHEISER changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Laurent CASTILLO changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Malika SOREL changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Roberto VANNACCI changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

The Left members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Germany040
Denmark010
Spain040
Finland030
France090
Ireland030
Italy080
Portugal020
Sweden020

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 615 members

No vote recorded, 103

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 103 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
2 Apr 2025Amendment 125 to paragraph 9 Implementation of the common security and defence policy – annual report 2024Amendment90 for, 534 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 13 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.80 601 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 8 to paragraph 22 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment160 for, 464 against, 46 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.80 569 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 41, adding text after paragraph 30 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAmendment183 for, 419 against, 44 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.80 545 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
11 Mar 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 24 European Semester for economic policy coordination 2026Amendment184 for, 441 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.79 534 voters
17 Jun 2026Amendment 5 to citation 4 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaAmendment145 for, 489 against, 23 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.79 560 voters
12 Mar 2025Amendment 102 to paragraph 1 White paper on the future of European defenceAmendment94 for, 533 against, 49 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.79 580 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 10 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment173 for, 426 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.79 512 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 18 to paragraph 14 Clean Industrial DealAmendment129 for, 386 against, 56 abstained Rejected For 23 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.79 513 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment178 for, 435 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.78 521 voters
22 May 2025Amendment 10 to Article 1, alinéa 1, point 16, sous-point b Règlement (UE) 2023/956 Article 22, paragraph 2, point b Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards simplifying and strengthening the carbon border adjustment mechanismAmendment159 for, 411 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.78 506 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-03/174663
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Amendment 11 to paragraph 6 — Energy-intensive industries”. Vote, 3 April 2025. votingId 174663, reference 2025/2536(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-03/174663 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 3 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-03-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 3 April 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-03-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-03, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-04-03/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2025-04-03-174663,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 11 to paragraph 6 — Energy-intensive industries}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-04-03},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-03/174663}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2025-04-03/174663},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 174663, reference 2025/2536(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-03-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-04-03-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-04-03 (CC BY 4.0)}
}