Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Sitting · Plenary

Tuesday 9 September 2025

Date
Tuesday 9 September 2025
Part-session
8–11 September 2025 Mon 8Tue 9Wed 10Thu 11
Decisions
10 decisions: 9 passed, 1 without a final vote
Votes
252 votes · 107 roll calls
More facts (5)
Voting time
13:41–14:19
Closest result
Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles (431 for, 145 against)
Amendments
69
Previous sitting
Monday 8 September 2025
Next sitting
Wednesday 10 September 2025
More
Cite this page Results of votes (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Decisions, 10

Export

Numbered as on the sitting’s record, by kind of decision.

Effect: what the decision did. Final vote: for–against–abstained and how it was recorded. Votes: votes taken on the decision (amendments, split parts, the final vote).
No.DecisionKindEffectFinal voteVotes
No.1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Committee report by Jens Gieseke, Paulius SaudargasKindNew laws · 1st readingPassed431 for, 145 against, 76 abstained roll callVotes67
No.2 Extension of the derogation for heavy-duty vehicles with zero emissions KindNew laws · 1st readingUrgent procedure agreedAdopted show of hands — no countVotes1
No.3 Waste Framework Directive: textiles and food waste Committee reportKindNew laws · 2nd readingApproved without a vote no voteVotes1
No.4 EU-Brazil Agreement: cooperation with and through Europol and the Federal Police of Brazil Committee report by Nikola BartůšekKindConsent · Consent procedureConsent given606 for, 5 against, 19 abstained roll callVotes1
No.5 EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement Committee report by Nacho Sánchez AmorKindConsent · Consent procedureConsent given473 for, 114 against, 58 abstained roll callVotes1
No.6 EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) Committee report by Nacho Sánchez AmorKindResolutionsAdopted434 for, 49 against, 168 abstained roll callVotes21
No.7 Public procurement Committee report by Piotr MüllerKindResolutionsAdopted432 for, 95 against, 124 abstained roll callVotes90
No.8 2023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Committee report by Michael GahlerKindResolutionsAdopted418 for, 135 against, 41 abstained roll callVotes68
No.9 Partial renewal of Members of the Court of Auditors – Joëlle Elvinger Committee reportKindResolutionsAppointment approved530 for, 41 against, 70 abstained counted, no namesVotes1
No.10 Partial renewal of Members of the Court of Auditors – Stef Blok Committee reportKindResolutionsAppointment approved462 for, 129 against, 25 abstained counted, no namesVotes1

All votes, 101

Export

Every vote of the day recorded by name. A decision can have many votes.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested by
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 59 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote448 for, 190 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by ECR
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 58 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote456 for, 187 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECR
9 Sept 2025Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 56 Public procurementAmendment530 for, 78 against, 40 abstained Adopted For 82 %Requested by EPP
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on paragraph 54 Public procurementSeparate vote440 for, 201 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&D
9 Sept 2025Separate vote on paragraph 53 Public procurementSeparate vote613 for, 24 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 95 %Requested by Patriots
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 46 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote475 for, 152 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by Patriots
9 Sept 2025Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 39 Public procurementAmendment254 for, 327 against, 66 abstained Rejected For 39 %Requested by The Left
9 Sept 2025Amendment 8 to paragraph 39 Public procurementAmendment228 for, 413 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by The Left
9 Sept 2025Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 Public procurementAmendment261 for, 365 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 40 %Requested by The Left
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 13 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote475 for, 149 against, 21 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by ECR
Show the other 40 votes of this page
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested by
9 Sept 2025Amendment 5 to paragraph 11 Public procurementAmendment92 for, 521 against, 29 abstained Rejected For 14 %Requested by The Left
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 8 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote457 for, 178 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriots
9 Sept 2025Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 6 Public procurementAmendment362 for, 226 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by The Left
9 Sept 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 Public procurementAmendment319 for, 295 against, 36 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by The Left
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 3 — part 2 Public procurementSplit vote497 for, 126 against, 23 abstained Adopted For 77 %Requested by S&D
9 Sept 2025Paragraph 3 — part 1 Public procurementSplit vote603 for, 29 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 93 %Requested by S&D
9 Sept 2025Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 2 Public procurementAmendment183 for, 416 against, 47 abstained Rejected For 28 %Requested by Patriots
9 Sept 2025Final vote — text as a whole EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution)Final434 for, 49 against, 168 abstained Adopted For 67 %
9 Sept 2025Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution)Amendment72 for, 522 against, 51 abstained Rejected For 11 %Requested by ESN
9 Sept 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation AgreementFinal473 for, 114 against, 58 abstained Adopted For 73 %
9 Sept 2025Final vote on the draft Council decision EU-Brazil Agreement: cooperation with and through Europol and the Federal Police of BrazilFinal606 for, 5 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 96 %
9 Sept 2025Final vote Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesFinal431 for, 145 against, 76 abstained Adopted For 66 %
9 Sept 2025Amendment 395 to recital 19 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment187 for, 442 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by S&D
9 Sept 2025Amendments 409 + 417 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 16 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment208 for, 431 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by S&D
9 Sept 2025Amendment 371 to Annex VII, Part C, point 13 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment530 for, 112 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 82 %Requested by Greens
9 Sept 2025Amendments 408 + 416 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 6 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment204 for, 438 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by S&D
9 Sept 2025Amendment 407 to Annex VII, Part C, point 4 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment137 for, 447 against, 61 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by S&D
9 Sept 2025Amendment 318 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment512 for, 120 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greens
9 Sept 2025Amendment 390 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment105 for, 538 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by Greens
9 Sept 2025Amendment 389 to Article 38, paragraph 3, après le point b Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment96 for, 549 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by Greens
9 Sept 2025Amendment 388 to Article 18, paragraph 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment124 for, 515 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 19 %Requested by Greens
9 Sept 2025Amendment 387 to Article 7, après le paragraph 4 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment207 for, 431 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Greens
9 Sept 2025Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment451 for, 182 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greens
9 Sept 2025Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment461 for, 185 against, 5 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Greens
9 Sept 2025Amendment 394 to Article 6, paragraph 1, après l'alinéa 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment142 for, 496 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 22 %Requested by ESN, S&D
9 Sept 2025Amendment 403 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment192 for, 442 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots, S&D
9 Sept 2025Amendment 130 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment444 for, 189 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 69 %Requested by Greens
9 Sept 2025Amendment 402 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment194 for, 434 against, 15 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Patriots, S&D
9 Sept 2025Amendment 393 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment120 for, 529 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by ESN, S&D
9 Sept 2025Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment438 for, 196 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greens
9 Sept 2025Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment452 for, 195 against, 2 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by Greens
9 Sept 2025Amendment 134 to Article 6 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment473 for, 154 against, 22 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by Greens
9 Sept 2025Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 2 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment512 for, 122 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 79 %Requested by Greens
9 Sept 2025Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment505 for, 126 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by Greens
9 Sept 2025Amendment 401 to Article 6 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment131 for, 447 against, 72 abstained Rejected For 20 %Requested by Patriots, S&D
9 Sept 2025Amendment 392 to Article 4, après le paragraph 1 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment138 for, 504 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by ESN, S&D
9 Sept 2025Amendment 391 to Article 4, paragraph 1, après le point b Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment138 for, 508 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by ESN, S&D
9 Sept 2025Amendments 399 + 412 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 15 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment168 for, 445 against, 36 abstained Rejected For 26 %Requested by Patriots
9 Sept 2025Amendment 398 to Article 3, paragraph 1, après le point 9 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment199 for, 437 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriots
9 Sept 2025Amendment 397 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 9 Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehiclesAmendment158 for, 471 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 24 %Requested by Patriots, S&D

Open these votes in the register to filter them further.

Day brief

A short account of the day, written by AI from the decisions and their summaries.

AI: The day in brief Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted positions on new EU laws, gave consent to international agreements, and passed resolutions on public procurement and Ukraine, shaping policy across several areas.

  • Circularity requirements for vehicle design: Parliament backed a law to boost recycling of materials like steel and plastic in cars and improve handling of old vehicles. S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR supported it; The Left, Patriots and ESN opposed; Greens mostly abstained.
  • EU-Brazil Agreement on Europol cooperation: Parliament consented to an agreement allowing Europol and Brazil's Federal Police to share data to fight serious crime and terrorism, with safeguards for human rights and data protection. All groups backed it.
  • EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership: Parliament consented to the Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement with the Kyrgyz Republic, enabling the EU to conclude it. S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR and Patriots backed it; The Left, Greens and ESN opposed.
  • EU-Kyrgyz Republic Agreement resolution: Parliament adopted a resolution on the EU-Kyrgyz Republic agreement, expressing concern about democratic backsliding and human rights abuses, and calling for a review within three years. Greens, S&D, Renew and EPP backed it; ESN opposed.
  • Public procurement: Parliament adopted a resolution on public procurement, urging simpler rules, more competition and SME participation, and shifting awards towards quality. Greens, Renew, EPP, ECR and Patriots backed it; The Left and ESN opposed.

Report a problem

Connections

The part-session and what the day’s decisions touch.

Other sittings of the part-session

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2025-09-09?vpage=2
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2025). “Sitting of Tuesday 9 September 2025”. Sitting, 9 September 2025. sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2025-09-09?vpage=2 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 9 September 2025 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2025-09-09/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-sitting-2025-09-09,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Sitting of Tuesday 9 September 2025}},
  year = {2025},
  date = {2025-09-09},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2025-09-09?vpage=2}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/sittings/2025-09-09?vpage=2},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Sitting. sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2025-09-09-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2025-09-09 (CC BY 4.0)}
}