Member

Sandra KALNIETE

EPP · Latvia

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Latvia
Roll-call participation: 96.3 %ⓘ of 2 521 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.9 % · 2026, roll calls
With majority line: 97.9 %ⓘ of 2 428 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.7 %

More facts (5)

National party: JV Jaunā Vienotība
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 15 of 2 328 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET, CULT (substitute), INTA (substitute)
Member id: 96934

National party: JV Jaunā Vienotība
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 15 of 2 328 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET, CULT (substitute), INTA (substitute)
Member id: 96934

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Roll-call participation ⓘ

96.3 %

2 428 of 2 521 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 91.0 % (+5.3 pts)

Chamber median: 90.9 %

With majority line ⓘ

97.9 %

2 378 of 2 428 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.7 % (+4.2 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.6 %

15 of 2 328 votes where their group had a clear line

15 opposite (for ↔ against), 0 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.6 %

15 of 2 428 votes cast

Participation 96.3 % — EPP median 91.0 %, 189 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 189 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Sandra KALNIETE	96.3 %
EPP median	91.0 %
Lowest in the group	2.5 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	189

With majority line 97.9 % — EPP median 93.7 %, 188 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 188 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Sandra KALNIETE	97.9 %
EPP median	93.7 %
Lowest in the group	70.9 %
Highest in the group	99.9 %
Members	188

2026, 2 521 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 5	343 for, 247 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 5	338 for, 261 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5	201 for, 390 against, 14 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5	280 for, 292 against, 26 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 64 to paragraph 5	200 for, 397 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 4	437 for, 82 against, 82 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 4	231 for, 350 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4	272 for, 256 against, 77 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 4	124 for, 428 against, 50 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 23 to paragraph 4	427 for, 156 against, 24 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 63 to paragraph 4	267 for, 332 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 3	194 for, 399 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3	136 for, 423 against, 46 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 62 to paragraph 3	92 for, 488 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2	203 for, 390 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 2 — part 2	524 for, 75 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 2 — part 1	596 for, 8 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1	427 for, 149 against, 29 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 1	111 for, 439 against, 51 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 1 — part 2	435 for, 127 against, 47 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 601 for, 4 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 5, adding text after recital H	200 for, 406 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 13 to recital C — part 2	344 for, 201 against, 63 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 13 to recital C — part 1	378 for, 202 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 4, adding text after recital B	195 for, 403 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 22	186 for, 408 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 5	207 for, 397 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Paragraph 5 — part 2	512 for, 86 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Paragraph 5 — part 1	602 for, 8 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2	210 for, 396 against, 1 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 1	210 for, 395 against, 1 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 2	347 for, 202 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 1	381 for, 202 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1	181 for, 424 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1	196 for, 411 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 2	344 for, 256 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 1	213 for, 394 against, 1 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 368 for, 172 against, 69 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 1, adding text after recital G	141 for, 462 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 22	452 for, 119 against, 39 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 20	480 for, 116 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 3	582 for, 10 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 2	275 for, 270 against, 64 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 1	490 for, 120 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 12	475 for, 121 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 4	478 for, 126 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 3	489 for, 116 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 2	479 for, 124 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 4 — part 3	474 for, 126 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 4 — part 2	499 for, 95 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 34 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2026	67	67
21 Jan 2026	112	107
22 Jan 2026	58	58
9 Feb 2026	2	1
10 Feb 2026	38	38
11 Feb 2026	13	13
12 Feb 2026	141	141
24 Feb 2026	43	43
9 Mar 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	197	196
11 Mar 2026	60	59
12 Mar 2026	34	34
25 Mar 2026	3	3
26 Mar 2026	69	69
27 Apr 2026	2	2
28 Apr 2026	225	222
29 Apr 2026	296	292
30 Apr 2026	68	0
18 May 2026	4	4
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	96
21 May 2026	98	97
15 Jun 2026	2	2
16 Jun 2026	40	40
17 Jun 2026	127	126
18 Jun 2026	77	77
6 Jul 2026	2	2
7 Jul 2026	72	71
8 Jul 2026	144	143
9 Jul 2026	67	65
14 Sept 2026	1	0
15 Sept 2026	155	155
16 Sept 2026	80	77
17 Sept 2026	124	124

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Siegfried MUREŞAN	Siegfried MUREŞAN	EPP	Romania	98 % of 5 206 shared	89 %
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	98 % of 4 362 shared	89 %
Select Pekka TOVERI	Pekka TOVERI	EPP	Finland	98 % of 4 790 shared	89 %
Select Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ	Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ	EPP	Lithuania	98 % of 4 391 shared	89 %
Select Jüri RATAS	Jüri RATAS	EPP	Estonia	98 % of 5 330 shared	89 %
Select Christine SCHNEIDER	Christine SCHNEIDER Former member	EPP	Germany	97 % of 3 341 shared	89 %
Select Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA	Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA	EPP	Romania	97 % of 4 245 shared	89 %
Select Inese VAIDERE	Inese VAIDERE	EPP	Latvia	97 % of 5 190 shared	89 %
Select Mika AALTOLA	Mika AALTOLA	EPP	Finland	97 % of 4 436 shared	89 %
Select Niels GEUKING	Niels GEUKING	EPP	Germany	97 % of 5 358 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	89 % of 4 817 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	89 % of 4 729 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	88 % of 5 228 shared	82 %
Select Ivars IJABS	Ivars IJABS	Renew	Latvia	88 % of 4 171 shared	82 %
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	88 % of 4 395 shared	82 %
Select Olivier CHASTEL	Olivier CHASTEL	Renew	Belgium	88 % of 4 910 shared	82 %
Select Sophie WILMÈS	Sophie WILMÈS	Renew	Belgium	87 % of 3 728 shared	82 %
Select Grégory ALLIONE	Grégory ALLIONE	Renew	France	87 % of 4 688 shared	82 %
Select Ilhan KYUCHYUK	Ilhan KYUCHYUK	Renew	Bulgaria	87 % of 4 988 shared	82 %
Select Elsi KATAINEN	Elsi KATAINEN	Renew	Finland	87 % of 5 379 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Culture and EducationCULT Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on International TradeINTA Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committee	Vice-chair	3 Feb 2025	now
Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation CommitteeD-RU Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-UA Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Caribbean-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDCAB Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committee	Member	23 Jan 2025	2 Feb 2025

Show all 9 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	INTA	4 Apr 2025
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	4 Apr 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation	AFET	24 Mar 2025
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	6 Mar 2025
No dossier named	Committee vice-chair	EUDS	30 Jan 2025
Standing Rapporteur on Russia	Rapporteur	AFET	16 Dec 2024

Show all 6 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

35 contributions recorded; 7 on behalf of their group; 52 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Jul 2026	Future of EU support for Russian democratic forces, anti-war actors and repressed civil society (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
16 Jun 2026	Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 May 2026	EU cybersecurity and preparedness in view of advanced AI systems (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	EU enlargement strategy (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
24 Feb 2026	Four years of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
10 Feb 2026	European response to the attacks on the Ukrainian energy system causing a humanitarian crisis (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 Jan 2026	Presentation of the Cybersecurity Act (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	Cases of pro-Russian espionage in the European Parliament (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
16 Dec 2025	Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 35 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 32

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
16 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0328	Motion for a resolutionwith 28 co-authors	—
15 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0304	Motion for a resolutionwith 32 co-authors	—
18 May 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban’s adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts B-10-2026-0255	Motion for a resolutionwith 20 co-authors	—
27 Apr 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine B-10-2026-0215	Motion for a resolutionwith 30 co-authors	—
11 Mar 2026	Interpretation of a European Commission decision E-10-2026-001015	Written question	5 May 2026
9 Mar 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION human trafficking and grave human rights violations linked to the recruitment of non-Russian nationals, in particular Africans, for Russia's war of aggression in Ukraine B-10-2026-0167	Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors	—
10 Feb 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine B-10-2026-0146	Motion for a resolutionwith 29 co-authors	—
8 Dec 2025	EU-based banks, including Raiffeisen and UniCredit, still operate in Russia, raising concerns about sanctions circumvention and undermining EU credibility E-10-2025-004854	Written questionwith 37 co-authors	16 Mar 2026
2 Dec 2025	European Democracy Shield – very large online platform algorithms, foreign interference and the spread of disinformation O-10-2025-000044	Oral questionwith 46 co-authors	Not yet answered
25 Nov 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the EU position on the proposed plan and EU engagement towards a just and lasting peace for Ukraine B-10-2025-0546	Motion for a resolutionwith 30 co-authors	—

Show all 32 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 24

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
19 Jun 2026	Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790057	CJ65	2
19 Jun 2026	Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790058	CJ65	5
19 Jun 2026	Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790059	CJ65	2
19 Jun 2026	Establishing the 'AgoraEU' programme for the period 2028-2034, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/692 and (EU) 2021/818 CJ65-AM-790061	CJ65	7
5 Jun 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788898	ITRE	5
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788894	ITRE	5
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788896	ITRE	3
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788899	ITRE	1
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788897	ITRE	5
18 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788903	ITRE	1

Show all 24 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Latvia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96934?page=2&period=2026&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Sandra KALNIETE”. Member record. memberId 96934. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96934?page=2&period=2026&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96934. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/96934?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-96934,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Sandra KALNIETE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96934?page=2&period=2026&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/96934?page=2&period=2026&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 96934. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/96934. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 32

Amendments tabled in committee, 24

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928