Member

Manfred WEBER

EPP · Germany

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Germany
Roll-call participation: 76.3 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line: 98.6 %ⓘ of 2 205 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.5 %

More facts (4)

National party: CSU Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V.
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 14 of 2 130 votesⓘ
Member id: 28229

National party: CSU Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V.
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 14 of 2 130 votesⓘ
Member id: 28229

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

76.3 %

2 205 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 91.0 % (−14.7 pts)

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

98.6 %

2 174 of 2 205 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.5 % (+5.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.7 %

14 of 2 130 votes where their group had a clear line

13 opposite (for ↔ against), 0 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

0.3 %

6 of 2 205 votes cast

Participation 76.3 % — EPP median 91.0 %, 187 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 187 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Manfred WEBER	76.3 %
EPP median	91.0 %
Lowest in the group	23.2 %
Highest in the group	99.7 %
Members	187

With majority line 98.6 % — EPP median 93.5 %, 187 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 187 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Manfred WEBER	98.6 %
EPP median	93.5 %
Lowest in the group	66.7 %
Highest in the group	98.9 %
Members	187

2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 24, adding text after recital 13	162 for, 424 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 3 to recital 11	257 for, 292 against, 59 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 23, adding text after recital 8	170 for, 412 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 22, adding text after recital 5	164 for, 425 against, 14 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 29 to Article 11	353 for, 254 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 28, adding text after Article 3	175 for, 399 against, 23 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 20 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point j	142 for, 434 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 19 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point g, point vii	110 for, 432 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 18 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point g, point iii	119 for, 436 against, 51 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 17 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point d	86 for, 479 against, 41 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 16 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point b	154 for, 421 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 27 to Article 3, paragraph 1, after point a	175 for, 408 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 5 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a, after point 1	322 for, 255 against, 36 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendments 26 + 31 + 6 + 21 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 3	362 for, 235 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendments 26 + 31 + 4 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 2	346 for, 254 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 15 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a	161 for, 430 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 14 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a	160 for, 433 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendments 26 + 31 + 4 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a — part 1	345 for, 237 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 13 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point a	119 for, 434 against, 51 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 12 to Article 2, after point 4	158 for, 433 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 11 to Article 2, after point 4	120 for, 433 against, 52 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 10 to Article 2, after point 4	161 for, 433 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 30 to Article 1, after paragraph 2	369 for, 236 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 9 to Article 1, paragraph 2	114 for, 422 against, 60 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 8 to Article 1, paragraph 1	117 for, 422 against, 66 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Proposal to reject the text	314 for, 276 against, 17 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Establishment of the digital euro Decision to open negotiations with the Council	Negotiating mandate approved 416 for, 169 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	Genetically modified maize DP202216 x NK603 x DAS-40278-9 and its sub-combinations DP 202216 x NK603, DP202216 x DAS-40278-9 Final vote — text as a whole	Objection passed 417 for, 167 against, 15 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 575 for, 33 against, 43 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	Genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 Final vote — text as a whole	Objection passed 460 for, 189 against, 14 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	Genetically modified soybean MON 87705 Final vote — text as a whole	Objection passed 466 for, 175 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Separate vote on recital J	337 for, 273 against, 46 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 6 to recital J	292 for, 348 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 5, adding text after recital I	274 for, 323 against, 51 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 4, adding text after recital I	383 for, 239 against, 34 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 2, adding text after recital C	374 for, 233 against, 45 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Separate vote on recital B	625 for, 7 against, 25 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 22	196 for, 423 against, 17 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 19	358 for, 166 against, 122 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 14	348 for, 282 against, 26 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 9	489 for, 142 against, 14 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 3	488 for, 68 against, 68 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 2	484 for, 78 against, 61 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendments 1 + 11 (voted as one) to paragraph 9 — part 1	453 for, 141 against, 45 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 5	234 for, 367 against, 51 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Separate vote on paragraph 5	615 for, 33 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 2	243 for, 384 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Paragraph 2 — part 2	567 for, 41 against, 50 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Paragraph 2 — part 1	628 for, 18 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
8 Jul 2026	The impact of the 1974 Turkish invasion on Cypriot women and girls, and the crimes committed by Turkish forces and consequences on gender equality Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 1	194 for, 445 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 8 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	0
23 Jan 2025	45	41
10 Feb 2025	1	1
11 Feb 2025	32	32
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	27
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	224
13 Mar 2025	24	0
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	243
3 Apr 2025	62	60
5 May 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	10	10
7 May 2025	220	0
8 May 2025	103	0
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	53
16 Jun 2025	2	2
17 Jun 2025	41	37
18 Jun 2025	91	90
19 Jun 2025	87	54
7 Jul 2025	1	1
8 Jul 2025	55	55
9 Jul 2025	134	122
10 Jul 2025	36	36
8 Sept 2025	1	1
9 Sept 2025	101	99
10 Sept 2025	34	34
11 Sept 2025	69	69
6 Oct 2025	2	2
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	54
9 Oct 2025	65	65
20 Oct 2025	3	0
21 Oct 2025	13	13
22 Oct 2025	186	165
23 Oct 2025	55	0
13 Nov 2025	267	256
24 Nov 2025	3	3
25 Nov 2025	75	72
26 Nov 2025	100	100
27 Nov 2025	125	0
15 Dec 2025	4	4
16 Dec 2025	66	66
17 Dec 2025	43	40
18 Dec 2025	42	0

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Christine SCHNEIDER	Christine SCHNEIDER Former member	EPP	Germany	99 % of 2 852 shared	89 %
Select Alexandra MEHNERT	Alexandra MEHNERT	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 200 shared	89 %
Select Axel VOSS	Axel VOSS	EPP	Germany	99 % of 3 795 shared	89 %
Select Oliver SCHENK	Oliver SCHENK	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 567 shared	89 %
Select Lena DÜPONT	Lena DÜPONT	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 098 shared	89 %
Select Andrea WECHSLER	Andrea WECHSLER	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 481 shared	89 %
Select Stefan KÖHLER	Stefan KÖHLER	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 286 shared	89 %
Select Ralf SEEKATZ	Ralf SEEKATZ	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 182 shared	89 %
Select Marion WALSMANN	Marion WALSMANN	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 620 shared	89 %
Select Verena MERTENS	Verena MERTENS	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 306 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	90 % of 4 221 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	89 % of 4 044 shared	82 %
Select Eugen TOMAC	Eugen TOMAC	Renew	Romania	89 % of 3 370 shared	82 %
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	89 % of 3 629 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	89 % of 4 474 shared	82 %
Select Elsi KATAINEN	Elsi KATAINEN	Renew	Finland	88 % of 4 563 shared	82 %
Select Andreas GLÜCK	Andreas GLÜCK	Renew	Germany	88 % of 3 124 shared	82 %
Select Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Renew	Germany	88 % of 4 489 shared	82 %
Select Olivier CHASTEL	Olivier CHASTEL	Renew	Belgium	88 % of 4 174 shared	82 %
Select Bart GROOTHUIS	Bart GROOTHUIS	Renew	Netherlands	88 % of 3 470 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

27 contributions recorded; 26 on behalf of their group; 127 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	State of the Union (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 6 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Presentation of the programme of activities of the Irish Presidency (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 3 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Preparation of the European Council (joint debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 4 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 5 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Urgent actions to revive EU competitiveness, deepen the EU Single Market and reduce the cost of living - from the Draghi report to reality (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 4 min	Read
21 Jan 2026	European Council meeting (joint debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 6 min	Read
20 Jan 2026	Presentation of the programme of activities of the Cyprus Presidency (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 3 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 6 min	Read
15 Dec 2025	Order of business on behalf of EPP	Speech · 1 min	Read
26 Nov 2025	The situation of Christian communities and religious minorities in Nigeria and the Middle East, and Europe’s responsibility to protect them and guarantee freedom of conscience (topical debate)	Speech · 3 min	Read

Show all 27 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 2

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
19 Sept 2024	Impact of climate policy on the employment rate in the mobility sector E-10-2024-001770	Written questionwith 20 co-authors	17 Dec 2024
17 Jul 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for the EU’s continuous support for Ukraine B-10-2024-0007	Motion for a resolutionwith 50 co-authors	—

Amendments tabled in committee, 1

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
26 Mar 2026	Amending Regulation (EU) 2018/848 as regards certain production, labelling and certification rules and certain rules on trade with third countries AGRI-AM-785380	AGRI	8

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28229?page=9&period=2025&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 27 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Manfred WEBER”. Member record. memberId 28229. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28229?page=9&period=2025&vscope=all (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/28229. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/28229?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-28229,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Manfred WEBER}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28229?page=9&period=2025&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28229?page=9&period=2025&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 28229. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/28229. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 2

Amendments tabled in committee, 1

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928