Member

Manfred WEBER

EPP · Germany

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Germany
Roll-call participation: 76.3 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line: 98.6 %ⓘ of 2 205 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.5 %

More facts (4)

National party: CSU Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V.
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 14 of 2 130 votesⓘ
Member id: 28229

National party: CSU Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V.
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 14 of 2 130 votesⓘ
Member id: 28229

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

76.3 %

2 205 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 91.0 % (−14.7 pts)

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

98.6 %

2 174 of 2 205 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.5 % (+5.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.7 %

14 of 2 130 votes where their group had a clear line

13 opposite (for ↔ against), 0 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

0.3 %

6 of 2 205 votes cast

Participation 76.3 % — EPP median 91.0 %, 187 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 187 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Manfred WEBER	76.3 %
EPP median	91.0 %
Lowest in the group	23.2 %
Highest in the group	99.7 %
Members	187

With majority line 98.6 % — EPP median 93.5 %, 187 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 187 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Manfred WEBER	98.6 %
EPP median	93.5 %
Lowest in the group	66.7 %
Highest in the group	98.9 %
Members	187

2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendments 89 + 105 + 108 (voted as one) to Article 1	371 for, 260 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 126 to Article 1	173 for, 477 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 70 to Article 1, paragraph 1, point 17; Regulation (EU) 2023/956	362 for, 272 against, 25 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 120 to Article 1, paragraph 1, after point 2; Regulation (EU) 2023/956	181 for, 462 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 103 to Article 1	182 for, 441 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 87 to Article 1	174 for, 465 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 7 — part 4	451 for, 197 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 7 — part 2	450 for, 196 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
15 Sept 2026	Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures Amendment 7 — part 1	636 for, 10 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
14 Sept 2026	Monday’s agenda – Request by The Left Group – ECB Monday’s agenda — Request by The Left Group — ECB	154 for, 216 against, 85 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Joint communication on humanitarian aid Amendment 15 to recital K	208 for, 347 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Joint communication on humanitarian aid Amendment 13 to recital D	238 for, 251 against, 88 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
9 Jul 2026	Joint communication on humanitarian aid Amendment 6 to paragraph 7	283 for, 216 against, 83 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Joint communication on humanitarian aid Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 4	279 for, 259 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Joint communication on humanitarian aid Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1	255 for, 315 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Feasibility of a 28th tax regime and its potential to support EU competitiveness Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Adopted 366 for, 192 against, 39 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan Amendment 4, adding text after recital D	480 for, 77 against, 32 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan Amendment 3 to recital B	310 for, 261 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan Amendment 6 to paragraph 7	334 for, 231 against, 29 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan Amendment 5 to paragraph 6	312 for, 248 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3	301 for, 281 against, 14 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 510 for, 1 against, 86 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 1 to recital E	176 for, 412 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 5 to recital E	195 for, 391 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 4 to recital C — part 2	133 for, 422 against, 40 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 4 to recital C — part 1	207 for, 379 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 — part 2	148 for, 414 against, 35 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 — part 1	194 for, 392 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 476 for, 28 against, 96 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 — part 2	190 for, 402 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Amendment 2 to paragraph 1 — part 1	177 for, 412 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Amendment 1, adding text after recital D	188 for, 330 against, 84 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 7 — part 2	281 for, 285 against, 31 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 7 — part 1	580 for, 2 against, 17 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 6	100 for, 404 against, 94 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5	72 for, 482 against, 49 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5	85 for, 445 against, 68 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 5 — part 5	543 for, 23 against, 36 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 5 — part 4	292 for, 279 against, 32 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 5 — part 3	563 for, 14 against, 28 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 5 — part 2	291 for, 280 against, 33 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Paragraph 5 — part 1	583 for, 1 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 4	87 for, 454 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 3	172 for, 431 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Separate vote on paragraph 4	570 for, 10 against, 20 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Separate vote on paragraph 3	532 for, 49 against, 25 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Separate vote on paragraph 2	594 for, 0 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	The threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan Separate vote on paragraph 1	594 for, 4 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Proposal to reject the text	276 for, 286 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
9 Jul 2026	Temporary derogation from the ePrivacy directive Amendment 25 to recital 32	157 for, 385 against, 20 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 8 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	0
23 Jan 2025	45	41
10 Feb 2025	1	1
11 Feb 2025	32	32
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	27
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	224
13 Mar 2025	24	0
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	243
3 Apr 2025	62	60
5 May 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	10	10
7 May 2025	220	0
8 May 2025	103	0
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	53
16 Jun 2025	2	2
17 Jun 2025	41	37
18 Jun 2025	91	90
19 Jun 2025	87	54
7 Jul 2025	1	1
8 Jul 2025	55	55
9 Jul 2025	134	122
10 Jul 2025	36	36
8 Sept 2025	1	1
9 Sept 2025	101	99
10 Sept 2025	34	34
11 Sept 2025	69	69
6 Oct 2025	2	2
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	54
9 Oct 2025	65	65
20 Oct 2025	3	0
21 Oct 2025	13	13
22 Oct 2025	186	165
23 Oct 2025	55	0
13 Nov 2025	267	256
24 Nov 2025	3	3
25 Nov 2025	75	72
26 Nov 2025	100	100
27 Nov 2025	125	0
15 Dec 2025	4	4
16 Dec 2025	66	66
17 Dec 2025	43	40
18 Dec 2025	42	0

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Christine SCHNEIDER	Christine SCHNEIDER Former member	EPP	Germany	99 % of 2 852 shared	89 %
Select Alexandra MEHNERT	Alexandra MEHNERT	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 200 shared	89 %
Select Axel VOSS	Axel VOSS	EPP	Germany	99 % of 3 795 shared	89 %
Select Oliver SCHENK	Oliver SCHENK	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 567 shared	89 %
Select Lena DÜPONT	Lena DÜPONT	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 098 shared	89 %
Select Andrea WECHSLER	Andrea WECHSLER	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 481 shared	89 %
Select Stefan KÖHLER	Stefan KÖHLER	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 286 shared	89 %
Select Ralf SEEKATZ	Ralf SEEKATZ	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 182 shared	89 %
Select Marion WALSMANN	Marion WALSMANN	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 620 shared	89 %
Select Verena MERTENS	Verena MERTENS	EPP	Germany	99 % of 4 306 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	90 % of 4 221 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	89 % of 4 044 shared	82 %
Select Eugen TOMAC	Eugen TOMAC	Renew	Romania	89 % of 3 370 shared	82 %
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	89 % of 3 629 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	89 % of 4 474 shared	82 %
Select Elsi KATAINEN	Elsi KATAINEN	Renew	Finland	88 % of 4 563 shared	82 %
Select Andreas GLÜCK	Andreas GLÜCK	Renew	Germany	88 % of 3 124 shared	82 %
Select Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Jan-Christoph OETJEN	Renew	Germany	88 % of 4 489 shared	82 %
Select Olivier CHASTEL	Olivier CHASTEL	Renew	Belgium	88 % of 4 174 shared	82 %
Select Bart GROOTHUIS	Bart GROOTHUIS	Renew	Netherlands	88 % of 3 470 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

27 contributions recorded; 26 on behalf of their group; 127 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	State of the Union (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 6 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Presentation of the programme of activities of the Irish Presidency (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 3 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Preparation of the European Council (joint debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 4 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 5 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Urgent actions to revive EU competitiveness, deepen the EU Single Market and reduce the cost of living - from the Draghi report to reality (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 4 min	Read
21 Jan 2026	European Council meeting (joint debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 6 min	Read
20 Jan 2026	Presentation of the programme of activities of the Cyprus Presidency (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 3 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 6 min	Read
15 Dec 2025	Order of business on behalf of EPP	Speech · 1 min	Read
26 Nov 2025	The situation of Christian communities and religious minorities in Nigeria and the Middle East, and Europe’s responsibility to protect them and guarantee freedom of conscience (topical debate)	Speech · 3 min	Read

Show all 27 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 2

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
19 Sept 2024	Impact of climate policy on the employment rate in the mobility sector E-10-2024-001770	Written questionwith 20 co-authors	17 Dec 2024
17 Jul 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for the EU’s continuous support for Ukraine B-10-2024-0007	Motion for a resolutionwith 50 co-authors	—

Amendments tabled in committee, 1

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
26 Mar 2026	Amending Regulation (EU) 2018/848 as regards certain production, labelling and certification rules and certain rules on trade with third countries AGRI-AM-785380	AGRI	8

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28229?page=8&period=2025&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 27 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Manfred WEBER”. Member record. memberId 28229. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28229?page=8&period=2025&vscope=all (retrieved 27 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/28229. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/28229?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-28229,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Manfred WEBER}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28229?page=8&period=2025&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/28229?page=8&period=2025&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-27},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 28229. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/28229. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version e994c83b5003 (27 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 2

Amendments tabled in committee, 1

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928