Skip to content

Member

Jaroslav KNOT

Patriots · Czechia

Group
Patriots PfE
Country
Czechia
Roll-call participation
79.7 %ⓘ of 3 835 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
75.1 %ⓘ of 3 049 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 82.7 %
More facts (5)
National party
ANO 2011
In office
Since 31 Jul 2025
Against clear line
441 of 2 439 votesⓘ
Committees
ECON, EMPL (substitute), JURI (substitute)
Member id
270261
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

79.7 %

3 058 of 3 835 roll calls while in office

Patriots median: 91.1 % (−11.4 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

75.1 %

2 289 of 3 049 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 82.7 % (−7.6 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

18.1 %

441 of 2 439 votes where their group had a clear line

158 opposite (for ↔ against), 260 abstained against the line, 23 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

15.6 %

477 of 3 058 votes cast

Participation 79.7 % — Patriots median 91.1 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Jaroslav KNOT79.7 %
Patriots median91.1 %
Lowest in the group44.5 %
Highest in the group99.9 %
Members89
With majority line 75.1 % — Patriots median 82.7 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Jaroslav KNOT75.1 %
Patriots median82.7 %
Lowest in the group72.5 %
Highest in the group92.9 %
Members89
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 3 835

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
9 Sept 2025EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 434 for, 49 against, 168 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
9 Sept 2025EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 72 for, 522 against, 51 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Abstained
9 Sept 2025EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 473 for, 114 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025EU-Brazil Agreement: cooperation with and through Europol and the Federal Police of Brazil Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 606 for, 5 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Final votePassed 431 for, 145 against, 76 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 395 to recital 19 187 for, 442 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendments 409 + 417 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 16 208 for, 431 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 371 to Annex VII, Part C, point 13 530 for, 112 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendments 408 + 416 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 6 204 for, 438 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 407 to Annex VII, Part C, point 4 137 for, 447 against, 61 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 318 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 512 for, 120 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 390 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 105 for, 538 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 389 to Article 38, paragraph 3, après le point b 96 for, 549 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 388 to Article 18, paragraph 1 124 for, 515 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 387 to Article 7, après le paragraph 4 207 for, 431 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 2 451 for, 182 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 1 461 for, 185 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 394 to Article 6, paragraph 1, après l'alinéa 2 142 for, 496 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 403 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 2 192 for, 442 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 130 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 444 for, 189 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 402 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 194 for, 434 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 393 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 120 for, 529 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 2 438 for, 196 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 1 452 for, 195 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 134 to Article 6 473 for, 154 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Abstained ≠ groupMajority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 2 512 for, 122 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 505 for, 126 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 401 to Article 6 131 for, 447 against, 72 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 392 to Article 4, après le paragraph 1 138 for, 504 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 391 to Article 4, paragraph 1, après le point b 138 for, 508 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendments 399 + 412 (voted as one) to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 15 168 for, 445 against, 36 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 398 to Article 3, paragraph 1, après le point 9 199 for, 437 against, 11 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 397 to Article 3, paragraph 1, point 9 158 for, 471 against, 17 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 396 to Article 2, paragraph 6, partie introductive 197 for, 418 against, 30 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
8 Sept 2025Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the PPE Group Ordre du jour de mercredi — Demande du groupe PPE 384 for, 10 against, 51 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 9 of 55 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Tomáš KUBÍN PatriotsCzechia97 % of 2 910 shared74 %
Ondřej KNOTEK PatriotsCzechia97 % of 2 931 shared74 %
Jaroslav BŽOCH PatriotsCzechia97 % of 2 917 shared74 %
Jaroslava POKORNÁ JERMANOVÁ PatriotsCzechia97 % of 2 708 shared74 %
Klara DOSTALOVA PatriotsCzechia97 % of 2 291 shared74 %
Jana NAGYOVÁ PatriotsCzechia97 % of 2 376 shared74 %
Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group ECRCzechia84 % of 1 391 shared74 %
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal77 % of 2 952 shared74 %
Antonín STANĚK PatriotsCzechia76 % of 2 780 shared74 %
António TÂNGER CORRÊA PatriotsPortugal74 % of 2 558 shared74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Adrian-George AXINIA ECRRomania72 % of 2 619 shared68 %
Roberts ZĪLE ECRLatvia72 % of 2 388 shared68 %
Marco SQUARTA ECRItaly72 % of 2 104 shared68 %
Guillaume PELTIER ECRFrance71 % of 2 845 shared68 %
Stephen Nikola BARTULICA ECRCroatia71 % of 2 703 shared68 %
Reinis POZŅAKS ECRLatvia71 % of 2 884 shared68 %
Rihards KOLS ECRLatvia71 % of 2 832 shared68 %
Georgiana TEODORESCU ECRRomania71 % of 2 812 shared68 %
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA ECRPoland71 % of 2 553 shared68 %
Gheorghe PIPEREA ECRRomania71 % of 2 447 shared68 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON CommitteeMember11 Sept 2025now
Committee on Employment and Social AffairsEMPL CommitteeSubstitute10 Sept 2025now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI CommitteeSubstitute24 Apr 2026now
Intergroup on Christians in the Middle EastIG10-07 Intergroup / working groupMember12 Jan 2026now
Committee on Transport and TourismTRAN CommitteeSubstitute10 Sept 202523 Apr 2026

Show all 5 seats

Dossiers

Show all 4 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

7 contributions recorded; 2 on behalf of their group; 10 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
8 Jul 2026Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre Speech · 1 minRead
17 Jun 2026Protecting EU citizens’ data from hybrid threats: the Lithuanian case (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
20 May 2026Recruitment of children by organised crime (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
29 Apr 2026The need to combat antisemitism and protect Jewish life in Europe, following the recent attacks against the Jewish community in the Netherlands and Belgium (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
28 Apr 2026Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025 (debate) on behalf of PatriotsSpeech · 2 minRead
25 Mar 2026Deposit protection and early intervention measures (joint debate) on behalf of PatriotsSpeech · 1 minRead
10 Feb 2026Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 7 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 11

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
31 Jul 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors—
11 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ending ideological flag displays on the premises of European Union institutions B-10-2026-0284Motion for a resolutionwith 29 co-authors—
3 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on prohibiting animal sacrifice during Eid al-Adha in the EU B-10-2026-0272Motion for a resolutionwith 9 co-authors—
22 Apr 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on protecting places of worship in the EU from foreign political interference and state-linked influence operations B-10-2026-0187Motion for a resolutionwith 16 co-authors—
21 Apr 2026Selective penalisation of religious expression in European football and consistency with EU fundamental rights E-10-2026-001627Written questionwith 20 co-authors1 Jul 2026
16 Apr 2026Respecting fundamental rights in Algeria and applying Article 2 of the EU-Algeria Association Agreement E-10-2026-001562Written questionwith 6 co-authors5 Jun 2026
3 Mar 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on halting the expansion of mosques and Islamic centres in the EU B-10-2026-0154Motion for a resolutionwith 37 co-authors—
14 Jan 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION seeking an opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed Partnership Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part, and the proposed Interim Agreement on Trade between the European Union, of the one part, and the Common Market of the South, the Argentine Republic, the Federative Republic of Brazil, the Republic of Paraguay and the Oriental Republic of Uruguay, of the other part B-10-2026-0061Motion for a resolutionwith 101 co-authors—
27 Nov 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on banning all application and enforcement of Sharia law in the EU B-10-2025-0553Motion for a resolutionwith 53 co-authors—
18 Sept 2025Classification of political expressions and satire under the Digital Services Act E-10-2025-003616Written questionwith 39 co-authors18 Nov 2025

Show all 11 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 22

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
31 Jul 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1095/2010, No 648/2012, No 600/2014, No 909/2014, 2015/2365, 2019/1156, 2021/23, 2022/858, 2023/1114, No 1060/2009, 2016/1011, 2017/2402, 2023/2631 and 2024/3005 as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union ECON-AM-791135 ECON13
31 Jul 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1095/2010, No 648/2012, No 600/2014, No 909/2014, 2015/2365, 2019/1156, 2021/23, 2022/858, 2023/1114, No 1060/2009, 2016/1011, 2017/2402, 2023/2631 and 2024/3005 as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union ECON-AM-791137 ECON16
31 Jul 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1095/2010, No 648/2012, No 600/2014, No 909/2014, 2015/2365, 2019/1156, 2021/23, 2022/858, 2023/1114, No 1060/2009, 2016/1011, 2017/2402, 2023/2631 and 2024/3005 as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union ECON-AM-791136 ECON15
31 Jul 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1095/2010, No 648/2012, No 600/2014, No 909/2014, 2015/2365, 2019/1156, 2021/23, 2022/858, 2023/1114, No 1060/2009, 2016/1011, 2017/2402, 2023/2631 and 2024/3005 as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union ECON-AM-791134 ECON5
31 Jul 2026on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) No 1095/2010, No 648/2012, No 600/2014, No 909/2014, 2015/2365, 2019/1156, 2021/23, 2022/858, 2023/1114, No 1060/2009, 2016/1011, 2017/2402, 2023/2631 and 2024/3005 as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union ECON-AM-791103 ECON5
27 Jul 2026on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2009/65/EC, 2011/61/EU and 2014/65/EU as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union ECON-AM-791083 ECON13
27 Jul 2026on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2009/65/EC, 2011/61/EU and 2014/65/EU as regards the further development of capital market integration and supervision within the Union ECON-AM-791126 ECON18
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791131 JURI56
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791128 JURI25
22 Jul 2026The 28th regime corporate legal framework – ‘EU Inc.’ JURI-AM-791129 JURI21

Show all 22 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Czechia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Jaroslav KNOT”. Member record. memberId 270261. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/270261?page=77&rows=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/270261. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/270261?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-270261,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Jaroslav KNOT}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/270261?page=77&rows=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/270261?page=77&rows=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 270261. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/270261. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}