Member

Anna Maria CISINT

Patriots · Italy

Group: Patriots PfE
Country: Italy
Roll-call participation: 72.7 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line: 83.1 %ⓘ of 2 095 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 83.1 %

More facts (5)

National party: L Lega
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 170 of 1 714 votesⓘ
Committees: FEMM (substitute), LIBE (substitute), PECH (substitute), TRAN
Member id: 257131

National party: L Lega
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 170 of 1 714 votesⓘ
Committees: FEMM (substitute), LIBE (substitute), PECH (substitute), TRAN
Member id: 257131

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

72.7 %

2 101 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

Patriots median: 93.3 % (−20.6 pts)

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

83.1 %

1 741 of 2 095 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 83.1 % (±0.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

9.9 %

170 of 1 714 votes where their group had a clear line

58 opposite (for ↔ against), 92 abstained against the line, 20 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

11.8 %

248 of 2 101 votes cast

Participation 72.7 % — Patriots median 93.3 %, 88 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 88 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Anna Maria CISINT	72.7 %
Patriots median	93.3 %
Lowest in the group	51.8 %
Highest in the group	99.9 %
Members	88

With majority line 83.1 % — Patriots median 83.1 %, 88 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 88 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Anna Maria CISINT	83.1 %
Patriots median	83.1 %
Lowest in the group	72.7 %
Highest in the group	93.8 %
Members	88

2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 23 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2025	2	0
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	44
10 Feb 2025	1	0
11 Feb 2025	32	32
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	0
10 Mar 2025	2	0
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	0
13 Mar 2025	24	0
31 Mar 2025	3	0
1 Apr 2025	35	34
2 Apr 2025	251	249
3 Apr 2025	62	0
5 May 2025	5	0
6 May 2025	10	10
7 May 2025	220	220
8 May 2025	103	0
21 May 2025	2	0
22 May 2025	53	0
16 Jun 2025	2	0
17 Jun 2025	41	40
18 Jun 2025	91	91
19 Jun 2025	87	0
7 Jul 2025	1	0
8 Jul 2025	55	55
9 Jul 2025	134	134
10 Jul 2025	36	36
8 Sept 2025	1	0
9 Sept 2025	101	100
10 Sept 2025	34	34
11 Sept 2025	69	69
6 Oct 2025	2	0
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	54
9 Oct 2025	65	0
20 Oct 2025	3	0
21 Oct 2025	13	12
22 Oct 2025	186	186
23 Oct 2025	55	0
13 Nov 2025	267	265
24 Nov 2025	3	0
25 Nov 2025	75	75
26 Nov 2025	100	100
27 Nov 2025	125	125
15 Dec 2025	4	0
16 Dec 2025	66	66
17 Dec 2025	43	43
18 Dec 2025	42	0

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Susanna CECCARDI	Susanna CECCARDI	Patriots	Italy	99 % of 4 645 shared	74 %
Select Silvia SARDONE	Silvia SARDONE	Patriots	Italy	98 % of 4 430 shared	74 %
Select Paolo BORCHIA	Paolo BORCHIA	Patriots	Italy	98 % of 4 994 shared	74 %
Select Raffaele STANCANELLI	Raffaele STANCANELLI	Patriots	Italy	97 % of 3 859 shared	74 %
Select Isabella TOVAGLIERI	Isabella TOVAGLIERI	Patriots	Italy	97 % of 4 221 shared	74 %
Select Roberto VANNACCI	Roberto VANNACCI changed group	ESN	Italy	97 % of 2 758 shared	74 %
Select Aldo PATRICIELLO	Aldo PATRICIELLO	Patriots	Italy	97 % of 2 130 shared	74 %
Select Antonín STANĚK	Antonín STANĚK	Patriots	Czechia	79 % of 3 344 shared	74 %
Select Anna BRYŁKA	Anna BRYŁKA changed group	Patriots	Poland	79 % of 4 410 shared	74 %
Select Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE	Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE	Patriots	Belgium	79 % of 4 950 shared	74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Guillaume PELTIER	Guillaume PELTIER	ECR	France	79 % of 4 637 shared	68 %
Select Laurence TROCHU	Laurence TROCHU	ECR	France	78 % of 4 959 shared	68 %
Select Marion MARÉCHAL	Marion MARÉCHAL	ECR	France	77 % of 4 349 shared	68 %
Select Roberto VANNACCI	Roberto VANNACCI changed group	ESN	Italy	77 % of 2 236 shared	68 %
Select Nicolas BAY	Nicolas BAY	ECR	France	77 % of 4 474 shared	68 %
Select Sarah KNAFO	Sarah KNAFO	ESN	France	76 % of 3 680 shared	70 %
Select Stephen Nikola BARTULICA	Stephen Nikola BARTULICA	ECR	Croatia	74 % of 4 232 shared	68 %
Select Anja ARNDT	Anja ARNDT	ESN	Germany	74 % of 4 269 shared	70 %
Select Marc JONGEN	Marc JONGEN	ESN	Germany	73 % of 4 497 shared	70 %
Select René AUST	René AUST	ESN	Germany	73 % of 4 580 shared	70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender EqualityFEMM Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on FisheriesPECH Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Transport and TourismTRAN Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America, including the EU-Central America Association Parliamentary CommitteeDCAM Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Biodiversity, Hunting and CountrysideIG10-04 Intergroup / working group	Member	4 Feb 2025	now

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Fisheries Policy, to the European Ocean Pact and of the Union’s maritime and aquaculture policy as part of the National and Regional Partnership Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP Fund] for the period from 2028 to 2034	Shadow rapporteur	PECH	22 May 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	FEMM	21 May 2025
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	PECH	15 Oct 2024
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	TRAN	3 Oct 2024
CJ01-LIBE/FEMM file on amending Directive 2011/29/EU establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2011/220/JHA (COM(2023)424) - 2023/0250(COD)	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	20 Sept 2024

Show all 5 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

16 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 21 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	Stop gold-plating, relieve SMEs: Member States must implement EU legislation without adding extra bureaucracy (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Jul 2026	The abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	The resilience of the European transport sector and the need to ensure the supply of essential goods amid ongoing geopolitical instability (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 May 2026	Situation of women and girls in Afghanistan following the Taliban's adoption of the Criminal Procedure Code for Courts	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 May 2026	Reviewing the ETS system to support European competitiveness (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Systemic oppression, inhumane conditions and arbitrary detentions by the regime in Iran on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Oct 2025	Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakes (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Sept 2025	State of the Union (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
1 Apr 2025	Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 20 March 2025 (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
22 Jan 2025	Links between organised crime and smuggling of migrants in light of the recent UN reports (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 16 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 115

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
9 Sept 2026	Lack of reciprocity of standards in the EU-Mercosur agreement E-10-2026-003571	Written question	Not yet answered
8 Aug 2026	The Ceuta border crisis and protecting the EU’s external borders P-10-2026-003231	Priority written questionwith 2 co-authors	18 Sept 2026
6 Aug 2026	Radical Islamism: threat to the LGBT+ community and the need to protect public safety in the EU E-10-2026-003220	Written questionwith 5 co-authors	Not yet answered
31 Jul 2026	Extraordinary measures needed to support the Italian shellfish farming industry E-10-2026-003183	Written questionwith 1 co-author	7 Sept 2026
29 Jul 2026	Urgent measures to tackle religious extremism and protect EU citizens E-10-2026-003168	Written question	Not yet answered
17 Jul 2026	Infringement procedure against all Member States for failure to transpose the Energy Performance of Buildings Directive E-10-2026-003045	Written questionwith 6 co-authors	Not yet answered
13 Jul 2026	Use of local public resources to finance public transport for asylum seekers and compatibility with EU law E-10-2026-002891	Written question	Not yet answered
9 Jul 2026	Drug and firearms trafficking along the Balkan route E-10-2026-002858	Written question	1 Sept 2026
6 Jul 2026	Need to restore and deploy resources to promote the European agri-food industry P-10-2026-002789	Priority written question	30 Jul 2026
2 Jul 2026	Stepping up protection of the EU’s external borders along the Balkan route E-10-2026-002758	Written question	17 Sept 2026

Show all 115 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 16

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
10 Jun 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Fisheries Policy, to the European Ocean Pact and of the Union’s maritime and aquaculture policy as part of the National and Regional Partnership Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP Fund] for the period from 2028 to 2034 PECH-AM-789128	PECH	15
10 Jun 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Fisheries Policy, to the European Ocean Pact and of the Union’s maritime and aquaculture policy as part of the National and Regional Partnership Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP Fund] for the period from 2028 to 2034 PECH-AM-789935	PECH	1
27 Apr 2026	Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 CJ05-AM-787838	CJ05	6
24 Apr 2026	Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 CJ05-AM-787836	CJ05	11
24 Apr 2026	Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 CJ05-AM-787837	CJ05	19
24 Apr 2026	Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 CJ05-AM-787835	CJ05	18
21 Jan 2026	Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2014/45/EU on periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers and Directive 2014/47/EU on the technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Union TRAN-AM-782354	TRAN	22
20 Jan 2026	Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the registration documents for vehicles and vehicle registration data recorded in national vehicle registers and repealing Council Directive 1999/37/EC TRAN-AM-782324	TRAN	1
27 Oct 2025	Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 as regards the establishment of a list of safe countries of origin at Union level LIBE-AM-779328	LIBE	23
17 Sept 2025	Military mobility CJ57-AM-777035	CJ57	19

Show all 16 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Patriots for Europe Patriots · Far-right · national conservatism, right-wing populism

National delegation

Delegation Italy National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257131?period=2025&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Anna Maria CISINT”. Member record. memberId 257131. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257131?period=2025&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257131. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257131?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-257131,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Anna Maria CISINT}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257131?period=2025&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257131?period=2025&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257131. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257131. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Patriots

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 115

Amendments tabled in committee, 16

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928