Member

Ştefan MUŞOIU

S&D · Romania

Group: S&D
Country: Romania
Roll-call participation: 83.4 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line: 94.1 %ⓘ of 2 411 votes where the group had a line · S&D median 96.5 %

More facts (5)

National party: PSD Partidul Social Democrat
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 132 of 2 391 votesⓘ
Committees: INTA, TRAN
Member id: 257103

National party: PSD Partidul Social Democrat
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 132 of 2 391 votesⓘ
Committees: INTA, TRAN
Member id: 257103

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

83.4 %

2 412 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

S&D median: 90.0 % (−6.6 pts)

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

94.1 %

2 269 of 2 411 votes where their group had a line

S&D median: 96.5 % (−2.4 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

5.5 %

132 of 2 391 votes where their group had a clear line

76 opposite (for ↔ against), 54 abstained against the line, 2 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

3.7 %

89 of 2 412 votes cast

Participation 83.4 % — S&D median 90.0 %, 136 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 136 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Ştefan MUŞOIU	83.4 %
S&D median	90.0 %
Lowest in the group	54.5 %
Highest in the group	99.7 %
Members	136

With majority line 94.1 % — S&D median 96.5 %, 136 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 136 members of the S&D with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Ştefan MUŞOIU	94.1 %
S&D median	96.5 %
Lowest in the group	80.8 %
Highest in the group	99.5 %
Members	136

2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of S&D; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 12 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	40
10 Feb 2025	1	0
11 Feb 2025	32	0
12 Feb 2025	10	0
13 Feb 2025	30	0
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	224
13 Mar 2025	24	24
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	34
2 Apr 2025	251	245
3 Apr 2025	62	56
5 May 2025	5	0
6 May 2025	10	9
7 May 2025	220	211
8 May 2025	103	91
21 May 2025	2	0
22 May 2025	53	53
16 Jun 2025	2	0
17 Jun 2025	41	32
18 Jun 2025	91	86
19 Jun 2025	87	87
7 Jul 2025	1	1
8 Jul 2025	55	54
9 Jul 2025	134	125
10 Jul 2025	36	36
8 Sept 2025	1	1
9 Sept 2025	101	99
10 Sept 2025	34	30
11 Sept 2025	69	61
6 Oct 2025	2	2
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	0
9 Oct 2025	65	0
20 Oct 2025	3	0
21 Oct 2025	13	0
22 Oct 2025	186	175
23 Oct 2025	55	54
13 Nov 2025	267	208
24 Nov 2025	3	0
25 Nov 2025	75	60
26 Nov 2025	100	96
27 Nov 2025	125	41
15 Dec 2025	4	4
16 Dec 2025	66	65
17 Dec 2025	43	42
18 Dec 2025	42	42

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within S&D

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Victor NEGRESCU	Victor NEGRESCU	S&D	Romania	99 % of 4 065 shared	93 %
Select Dragoş BENEA	Dragoş BENEA	S&D	Romania	99 % of 2 997 shared	93 %
Select Gabriela FIREA	Gabriela FIREA	S&D	Romania	98 % of 3 172 shared	93 %
Select Claudiu MANDA	Claudiu MANDA	S&D	Romania	98 % of 2 401 shared	93 %
Select Mihai TUDOSE	Mihai TUDOSE	S&D	Romania	97 % of 3 082 shared	93 %
Select Gheorghe CÂRCIU	Gheorghe CÂRCIU	S&D	Romania	97 % of 3 036 shared	93 %
Select Andi CRISTEA	Andi CRISTEA	S&D	Romania	97 % of 4 101 shared	93 %
Select Dan NICA	Dan NICA	S&D	Romania	96 % of 3 017 shared	93 %
Select Vasile DÎNCU	Vasile DÎNCU	S&D	Romania	95 % of 4 387 shared	93 %
Select Carla TAVARES	Carla TAVARES	S&D	Portugal	94 % of 4 557 shared	93 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Elisabetta GUALMINI	Elisabetta GUALMINI changed group	Renew	Italy	88 % of 1 411 shared	86 %
Select Dainius ŽALIMAS	Dainius ŽALIMAS	Renew	Lithuania	88 % of 4 520 shared	86 %
Select Marjan ŠAREC	Marjan ŠAREC	Renew	Slovenia	88 % of 4 249 shared	86 %
Select Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Yvan VEROUGSTRAETE	Renew	Belgium	88 % of 3 565 shared	86 %
Select Bernard GUETTA	Bernard GUETTA	Renew	France	88 % of 4 228 shared	86 %
Select Jana TOOM	Jana TOOM	Renew	Estonia	88 % of 4 365 shared	86 %
Select Charles GOERENS	Charles GOERENS	Renew	Luxembourg	88 % of 4 497 shared	86 %
Select Pascal CANFIN	Pascal CANFIN	Renew	France	88 % of 4 481 shared	86 %
Select Valérie HAYER	Valérie HAYER	Renew	France	88 % of 4 636 shared	86 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	87 % of 4 246 shared	86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on International TradeINTA Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Transport and TourismTRAN Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Subcommittee on Human RightsDROI Subcommittee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-Türkiye Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-TR Joint parliamentary committee	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE Delegation	Member	16 Jul 2024	now
Intergroup on the Future of Education and Skills for a Competitive EuropeIG10-14 Intergroup / working group	Member	29 Jan 2025	now

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Maritime transport: monitoring, reporting and verification and alignment with revisions of the EU Emissions Trading System	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	TRAN	24 Sept 2026
Temporary trade-liberalisation measures applicable to Armenian products	Shadow rapporteur	INTA	1 Sept 2026
DASE - Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)	Official delegation	DASE	14 Jul 2026
Declaration on awareness of conflicts of interest (DACI) as participant in an official delegation of \"The 15th EU-Singapore Inter-Parliamentary Meeting, Singapore, 21 - 23 July 2026\"	Official delegation	DASE	29 Jun 2026
Connecting Europe through high-speed rail	Shadow rapporteur	TRAN	10 Mar 2026
EP delegation to the Conciliation Committee on Air Passenger Rights 2013/0072(COD)\"	Trilogue negotiator		5 Feb 2026
Amending Regulation (EU) 2024/823 of 28 February 2024 on exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the Stabilisation and Association Process	Shadow rapporteur	INTA	22 Sept 2025
Full Member of the Delegation - Delegation for the countries with Southeast Asia and the ASEAN (DASE)	Official delegation		12 Nov 2024

Show all 8 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

19 contributions recorded; 22 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
18 May 2026	Negative trade-related effects of global overcapacity on the Union steel market (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
18 May 2026	Negative trade-related effects of global overcapacity on the Union steel market (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
27 Apr 2026	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Feb 2026	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 Jan 2026	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Dec 2025	Presentation of the automotive package (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
24 Nov 2025	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
6 Oct 2025	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Sept 2025	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2025	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 19 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 18

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
10 Sept 2026	Measures needed to strengthen Europe’s migrant integration policy, based on greater mutual respect and reconciliation E-10-2026-003630	Written question	Not yet answered
26 Aug 2026	The need to speed up the presentation of legislative proposals and establish clear restrictions on social media access for minors E-10-2026-003339	Written question	Not yet answered
24 Jul 2026	Uneven application of Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 and possible malpractices in checks on road transport operators E-10-2026-003128	Written question	Not yet answered
16 Jul 2026	Ensuring the continued operation of the Blue Flag Programme under Directive (EU) 2024/825 E-10-2026-003031	Written questionwith 29 co-authors	18 Sept 2026
15 Jul 2026	Update by the Commission of its guidelines on tackling online disinformation during electoral processes E-10-2026-002950	Written questionwith 31 co-authors	11 Sept 2026
6 Jul 2026	Adapting the European regulatory framework to the risks posed by agentic AI P-10-2026-002790	Priority written question	27 Aug 2026
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
15 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0309	Motion for a resolutionwith 10 co-authors	—
15 Apr 2026	Need for a further coordinated response at EU level P-10-2026-001544	Priority written question	23 Jun 2026
23 Mar 2026	Risks for the Member States of a protracted migratory crisis E-10-2026-001189	Written question	4 May 2026

Show all 18 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 15

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
1 Jul 2026	Connecting Europe through high-speed rail TRAN-AM-790790	TRAN	29
2 Feb 2026	Proposal for a Council regulation laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2028 to 2034 TRAN-AM-784186	TRAN	7
30 Jan 2026	Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 BUDG-AM-784180	BUDG	1
5 Dec 2025	Addressing the negative trade-related effects of global overcapacity on the Union steel market INTA-AM-781298	INTA	5
27 Nov 2025	Implementing the bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products INTA-AM-781134	INTA	1
26 Sept 2025	General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 - all sections BUDG-AM-778084	BUDG	1
17 Sept 2025	Military mobility CJ57-AM-777036	CJ57	21
17 Sept 2025	Military mobility CJ57-AM-777035	CJ57	15
12 Sept 2025	EU-US political relations INTA-AM-775733	INTA	14
30 Jun 2025	Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement TRAN-AM-774444	TRAN	3

Show all 15 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats S&D · Centre-left · social democracy

National delegation

Delegation Romania National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257103?period=2025&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Ştefan MUŞOIU”. Member record. memberId 257103. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257103?period=2025&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257103. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257103?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-257103,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Ştefan MUŞOIU}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257103?period=2025&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257103?period=2025&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257103. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257103. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within S&D

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 18

Amendments tabled in committee, 15

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928