Member

Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK

Patriots · Poland

Group: Patriots PfE Changed group: ESN 16 Jul 2024 – 24 Mar 2026 → Patriots since 25 Mar 2026
Country: Poland
Roll-call participation: 81.6 %ⓘ of 2 521 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.9 % · 2026, roll calls Changed group in this period: not compared with a single group’s median.
With majority line: 81.0 %ⓘ of 2 052 votes where the group had a line · compared per group under Record

More facts (5)

National party: Konfederacja Konfederacja Wolność i Niepodległość
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 197 of 1 716 votesⓘ
Committees: ITRE, LIBE (substitute)
Member id: 257069

National party: Konfederacja Konfederacja Wolność i Niepodległość
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 197 of 1 716 votesⓘ
Committees: ITRE, LIBE (substitute)
Member id: 257069

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Roll-call participation ⓘ

81.6 %

2 056 of 2 521 roll calls while in office

Chamber median: 90.9 %

With majority line ⓘ

81.0 %

1 662 of 2 052 votes where their group had a line

Against clear line ⓘ

11.5 %

197 of 1 716 votes where their group had a clear line

66 opposite (for ↔ against), 105 abstained against the line, 26 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

12.5 %

256 of 2 056 votes cast

Compared with each group they sat in

The member’s record in each group they sat in during the period, over the roll calls held while they sat in it (dates: the first and last of them). Each figure with its denominator: participation of the roll calls held, majority line of the votes where the group had one, against clear line of the votes where it had a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting), abstention of the votes cast. Median: that group’s median over the same roll calls, with the member’s difference in percentage points. A figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.

The member’s record in each group they sat in during the period, over the roll calls held while they sat in it (dates: the first and last of them). Each figure with its denominator: participation of the roll calls held, majority line of the votes where the group had one, against clear line of the votes where it had a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting), abstention of the votes cast. Median: that group’s median over the same roll calls, with the member’s difference in percentage points. A figure over fewer than 50 votes is shown as a count.
Group	Participation	With majority line	Against clear line	Abstention
ESN 20 Jan 2026 – 12 Mar 2026	90.9 % of 766 median 97.4 % (−6.5 pts)	76.9 % of 696 median 92.4 % (−15.5 pts)	17.2 % of 644	13.9 % of 696
Patriots 25 Mar 2026 – 17 Sept 2026	77.5 % of 1 755 median 93.7 % (−16.2 pts)	83.1 % of 1 356 median 83.4 % (−0.3 pts)	8.0 % of 1 072	11.7 % of 1 360

2026, 2 521 roll-call votes.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.
This member changed group in this period: each vote counts them in the group of that day, and they are compared with each group over the roll calls held while they sat in it — not with one group’s median.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 5 of 34 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2026	67	67
21 Jan 2026	112	111
22 Jan 2026	58	57
9 Feb 2026	2	2
10 Feb 2026	38	37
11 Feb 2026	13	13
12 Feb 2026	141	140
24 Feb 2026	43	0
9 Mar 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	197	174
11 Mar 2026	60	60
12 Mar 2026	34	34
25 Mar 2026	3	3
26 Mar 2026	69	69
27 Apr 2026	2	2
28 Apr 2026	225	223
29 Apr 2026	296	293
30 Apr 2026	68	65
18 May 2026	4	3
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	88
21 May 2026	98	82
15 Jun 2026	2	2
16 Jun 2026	40	40
17 Jun 2026	127	127
18 Jun 2026	77	77
6 Jul 2026	2	2
7 Jul 2026	72	71
8 Jul 2026	144	143
9 Jul 2026	67	67
14 Sept 2026	1	0
15 Sept 2026	155	0
16 Sept 2026	80	0
17 Sept 2026	124	0

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within the same group (on the day of each vote)

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Tomasz BUCZEK	Tomasz BUCZEK changed group	Patriots	Poland	99 % of 1 338 shared	74 %
Select Anna BRYŁKA	Anna BRYŁKA changed group	Patriots	Poland	98 % of 1 157 shared	74 %
Select Marcin SYPNIEWSKI	Marcin SYPNIEWSKI	ESN	Poland	97 % of 3 154 shared	80 %
Select Stanisław TYSZKA	Stanisław TYSZKA	ESN	Poland	97 % of 2 015 shared	80 %
Select António TÂNGER CORRÊA	António TÂNGER CORRÊA	Patriots	Portugal	84 % of 1 355 shared	74 %
Select Vilis KRIŠTOPANS	Vilis KRIŠTOPANS	Patriots	Latvia	83 % of 1 253 shared	74 %
Select Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ	Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ	Patriots	Portugal	82 % of 1 299 shared	74 %
Select Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL	Juan Carlos GIRAUTA VIDAL	Patriots	Spain	81 % of 1 003 shared	74 %
Select Barbara BONTE	Barbara BONTE	Patriots	Belgium	81 % of 1 353 shared	74 %
Select Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE	Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE	Patriots	Belgium	81 % of 1 347 shared	74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select René AUST	René AUST	ESN	Germany	78 % of 1 285 shared	70 %
Select Stanisław TYSZKA	Stanisław TYSZKA	ESN	Poland	78 % of 1 204 shared	70 %
Select Mary KHAN	Mary KHAN	ESN	Germany	78 % of 1 316 shared	70 %
Select Hans NEUHOFF	Hans NEUHOFF	ESN	Germany	78 % of 1 068 shared	70 %
Select Irmhild BOSSDORF	Irmhild BOSSDORF	ESN	Germany	77 % of 1 350 shared	70 %
Select Markus BUCHHEIT	Markus BUCHHEIT	ESN	Germany	77 % of 1 208 shared	70 %
Select Arno BAUSEMER	Arno BAUSEMER	ESN	Germany	77 % of 1 333 shared	70 %
Select Anja ARNDT	Anja ARNDT	ESN	Germany	77 % of 1 309 shared	70 %
Select Marcin SYPNIEWSKI	Marcin SYPNIEWSKI	ESN	Poland	76 % of 1 340 shared	70 %
Select Marc JONGEN	Marc JONGEN	ESN	Germany	76 % of 1 356 shared	70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE Committee	Member	27 Apr 2026	now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Substitute	24 Apr 2026	now
Delegation to the EU-Türkiye Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-TR Joint parliamentary committee	Member	17 Jun 2026	now
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	21 Jan 2025
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI Committee	Substitute	22 Jan 2025	24 Mar 2026
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	24 Mar 2026
Subcommittee on Tax MattersFISC Subcommittee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	21 Jan 2025
Delegation for relations with JapanD-JP Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	24 Mar 2026
Delegation for relations with MercosurDMER Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	24 Mar 2026
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	24 Mar 2026

Show all 10 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Establishing the Union support for asylum, migration and integration for the period from 2028 to 2034	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	21 Jan 2026
Laying down rules to prevent and combat child sexual abuse	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	8 Dec 2025
UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)	Shadow rapporteur	ENVI	22 Jul 2025
Amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1348 as regards the application of the ‘safe third country’ concept	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	22 Jul 2025
Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	22 Jul 2025
Instrumentalisation in the field of migration and asylum – 2021/0427(COD)	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	13 Nov 2024
Restructuring the Union framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (2021/0213 (CNS))	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	13 Nov 2024
Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation (BEFIT) (2023/0321 (CNS))	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	13 Nov 2024
2008/0140(APP) - Equal treatment of persons irrespective of religion or belief, disability, age or sexual orientation	Shadow rapporteur	LIBE	28 Oct 2024
No dossier named	Vice-President		16 Jul 2024

Show all 10 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

48 contributions recorded; 20 on behalf of their group; 63 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
9 Jul 2026	Composition of committees and delegations	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Jul 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Electrification Action Plan (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 May 2026	Presentation of the Fertilisers Action Plan (debate)	Speech	Read
19 May 2026	Presentation of the Fertilisers Action Plan (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 May 2026	Presentation of the Fertilisers Action Plan (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	Commission interference in democratic process and elections (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Mar 2026	Rise of political violence, notably by far-left organisations (debate) on behalf of ESN	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 36

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
31 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373	Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors	—
15 Jul 2026	EU support for the construction of a railway line between the Polish border and Lviv E-10-2026-002974	Written question	Not yet answered
15 Jul 2026	Operating rules for third country subsidiaries on the EU rail market E-10-2026-002975	Written question	Not yet answered
30 Jun 2026	Switching off air conditioning and doubts about the functioning of climate infrastructure E-10-2026-002709	Written question	15 Sept 2026
30 Jun 2026	Discrimination against men in Council recommendations to Poland for 2026-2027 E-10-2026-002708	Written question	24 Aug 2026
29 Jun 2026	Imports of meat from Brazil – consumer safety and regulatory restrictions E-10-2026-002685	Written question	21 Aug 2026
29 Jun 2026	Consistency between EU climate policy and trade policy E-10-2026-002684	Written question	19 Aug 2026
3 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the quality and timeliness of the European Commission’s replies to Members’ written questions B-10-2026-0271	Motion for a resolutionwith 33 co-authors	—
3 Jun 2026	Ukraine’s glorification of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army criminals and the EU accession process E-10-2026-002283	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	14 Aug 2026
2 Jun 2026	Risks associated with tariff quota management system in EU-Mercosur agreement E-10-2026-002238	Written questionwith 22 co-authors	27 Jul 2026

Show all 36 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 35

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791071	CJ72	8
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791072	CJ72	1
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-786820	CJ72	1
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791073	CJ72	5
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791874	CJ72	1
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791883	CJ72	19
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-790968	CJ72	9
15 Jun 2026	Amending Directives 2008/98/EC, 2010/75/EU, (EU) 2015/2193 and (EU) 2024/1785 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards simplification of some requirements and reduction of administrative burden ITRE-AM-789171	ITRE	9
27 May 2026	Amending Directives (EU) 2018/2001, (EU) 2019/944, (EU) 2024/1788 as regards acceleration of permit-granting procedures ITRE-AM-788845	ITRE	1
19 May 2026	Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869 ITRE-AM-788940	ITRE	15

Show all 35 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political groups this term

Group Patriots for Europe Patriots · Far-right · national conservatism, right-wing populism
Group Europe of Sovereign Nations ESN · Far-right · ultranationalism

National delegation

Delegation Poland National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257069?period=2026&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK”. Member record. memberId 257069. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257069?period=2026&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257069. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257069?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-257069,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257069?period=2026&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257069?period=2026&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257069. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257069. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}