Member

Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ

Renew · Slovakia

Group: Renew
Country: Slovakia
Roll-call participation: 27.6 %ⓘ of 261 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.8 % · 2026, final votes
With majority line: 93.0 %ⓘ of 71 votes where the group had a line · Renew median 93.1 %

More facts (5)

National party: PS Progresívne Slovensko
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 1 of 62 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO, INTA (substitute), REGI (vice-chair)
Member id: 257013

National party: PS Progresívne Slovensko
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 1 of 62 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO, INTA (substitute), REGI (vice-chair)
Member id: 257013

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Roll-call participation ⓘ

27.6 %

72 of 261 final votes while in office

Renew median: 92.3 % (−64.8 pts)

Chamber median: 90.8 %

With majority line ⓘ

93.0 %

66 of 71 votes where their group had a line

Renew median: 93.1 % (−0.2 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.6 %

1 of 62 votes where their group had a clear line

0 opposite (for ↔ against), 1 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

2.8 %

2 of 72 votes cast

Participation 27.6 % — Renew median 92.3 %, 77 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 77 members of the Renew with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ	27.6 %
Renew median	92.3 %
Lowest in the group	27.6 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	77

With majority line 93.0 % — Renew median 93.1 %, 77 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 77 members of the Renew with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ	93.0 %
Renew median	93.1 %
Lowest in the group	76.7 %
Highest in the group	97.8 %
Members	77

2026, 261 final votes; 261 of 342 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Renew; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 20 of 26 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2026	6	0
21 Jan 2026	8	0
22 Jan 2026	8	0
10 Feb 2026	8	0
11 Feb 2026	10	0
12 Feb 2026	8	0
24 Feb 2026	1	0
10 Mar 2026	9	0
11 Mar 2026	12	0
12 Mar 2026	6	0
26 Mar 2026	13	0
28 Apr 2026	14	0
29 Apr 2026	17	0
30 Apr 2026	11	0
19 May 2026	3	0
20 May 2026	12	0
21 May 2026	10	0
16 Jun 2026	10	0
17 Jun 2026	16	0
18 Jun 2026	7	0
7 Jul 2026	15	15
8 Jul 2026	15	15
9 Jul 2026	4	4
15 Sept 2026	12	12
16 Sept 2026	16	16
17 Sept 2026	10	10

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Renew

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Lucia YAR	Lucia YAR	Renew	Slovakia	99 % of 3 859 shared	92 %
Select Ľudovít ÓDOR	Ľudovít ÓDOR	Renew	Slovakia	99 % of 3 557 shared	92 %
Select Martin HOJSÍK	Martin HOJSÍK	Renew	Slovakia	99 % of 3 636 shared	92 %
Select Michal WIEZIK	Michal WIEZIK	Renew	Slovakia	99 % of 3 538 shared	92 %
Select Veronika CIFROVÁ OSTRIHOŇOVÁ	Veronika CIFROVÁ OSTRIHOŇOVÁ	Renew	Slovakia	99 % of 3 241 shared	92 %
Select Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Gerben-Jan GERBRANDY	Renew	Netherlands	97 % of 3 799 shared	92 %
Select Marjan ŠAREC	Marjan ŠAREC	Renew	Slovenia	97 % of 3 539 shared	92 %
Select Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE	Raquel GARCÍA HERMIDA-VAN DER WALLE	Renew	Netherlands	97 % of 3 861 shared	92 %
Select Ilhan KYUCHYUK	Ilhan KYUCHYUK	Renew	Bulgaria	96 % of 3 516 shared	92 %
Select Taner KABILOV	Taner KABILOV changed group	ECR	Bulgaria	96 % of 478 shared	92 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Birgit SIPPEL	Birgit SIPPEL	S&D	Germany	90 % of 3 159 shared	86 %
Select Udo BULLMANN	Udo BULLMANN	S&D	Germany	89 % of 3 099 shared	86 %
Select Jens GEIER	Jens GEIER	S&D	Germany	89 % of 3 505 shared	86 %
Select Tobias CREMER	Tobias CREMER	S&D	Germany	89 % of 3 761 shared	86 %
Select Isilda GOMES	Isilda GOMES	S&D	Portugal	89 % of 3 452 shared	86 %
Select Bernd LANGE	Bernd LANGE	S&D	Germany	89 % of 3 329 shared	86 %
Select René REPASI	René REPASI	S&D	Germany	89 % of 3 555 shared	86 %
Select Sven MIKSER	Sven MIKSER	S&D	Estonia	89 % of 3 817 shared	86 %
Select Vivien COSTANZO	Vivien COSTANZO	S&D	Germany	89 % of 3 821 shared	86 %
Select Lina GÁLVEZ	Lina GÁLVEZ	S&D	Spain	89 % of 3 369 shared	86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on International TradeINTA Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI Committee	Vice-chair	23 Jul 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-Montenegro Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeD-ME Joint parliamentary committee	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN Delegation	Substitute	23 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the Korean PeninsulaDKOR Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)IG10-22 Intergroup / working group	Member	12 Mar 2025	now
Committee on Regional DevelopmentREGI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	22 Jul 2024

Show all 8 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Official delegation	REGI	7 May 2026
Establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034	Shadow rapporteur	REGI	13 Jan 2026
Amending Regulation (EU) 2024/823 of 28 February 2024 on exceptional trade measures for countries and territories participating in or linked to the Stabilisation and Association Process	Shadow rapporteur	INTA	17 Sept 2025
Phasing out Russian natural gas imports, improving monitoring of potential energy dependencies and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1938	Shadow rapporteur	INTA	7 Jul 2025
Amending Regulations (EU) 2021/1058 and (EU) 2021/1056 as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review	Shadow rapporteur	REGI	22 May 2025
Modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported directly or indirectly from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus	Shadow rapporteur	INTA	26 Mar 2025
Stock-taking of the European elections 2024	Rapporteur	AFCO	21 Feb 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation	REGI	18 Feb 2025
No dossier named	Committee vice-chair	REGI	14 Feb 2025
European Parliament's Right of Inquiry	Shadow rapporteur	AFCO	27 Nov 2024

Show all 15 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

28 contributions recorded, 6 written statements; 8 on behalf of their group; 30 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
15 Sept 2026	Devastating heatwaves, wildfires and droughts in Europe: lessons from summer 2026 (debate)	Statement	Read
7 Jul 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine (debate)	Statement	Read
16 Dec 2025	Phasing out Russian natural gas imports and improving monitoring of potential energy dependencies (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 1 min	Read
12 Nov 2025	The new 2028-2034 Multiannual Financial Framework: architecture and governance (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
22 Oct 2025	Ending all energy imports from Russia to the EU and closing loopholes through third countries (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Oct 2025	United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Sept 2025	Stock-taking of the European elections 2024 (A10-0156/2025 - Ľubica Karvašová) (vote)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Sept 2025	Amending ERDF, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 2 min	Read
9 Jul 2025	The EU’s post-2027 long-term budget: Parliament’s expectations ahead of the Commission’s proposal (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 28 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 70

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0403	Motion for a resolutionwith 15 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect the EU’s external borders B-10-2026-0414	Motion for a resolutionwith 13 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong Kong following the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0399	Motion for a resolutionwith 15 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0416	Motion for a resolutionwith 17 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan B-10-2026-0348	Motion for a resolutionwith 16 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0361	Motion for a resolutionwith 18 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre B-10-2026-0353	Motion for a resolutionwith 16 co-authors	—
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
29 Jun 2026	Deterioration of Elene Khoshtaria’s health condition and political persecution in Georgia E-10-2026-002678	Written questionwith 10 co-authors	5 Aug 2026
29 Jun 2026	Evasion of European sanctions through Türkiye in the case of machinery produced in Member States for the Russian military supply chain E-10-2026-002679	Written questionwith 9 co-authors	21 Aug 2026

Show all 70 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 70

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
16 Sept 2026	Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034 REGI-AM-792057	REGI	9
7 Sept 2026	Establishing the European Fund for Regional Development including for European Territorial Cooperation (Interreg) and the Cohesion Fund as part of the Fund set out in Regulation (EU) […] [NRP] and establishing conditions for the implementation of the Union support to regional development from 2028 to 2034 REGI-AM-792058	REGI	10
27 Aug 2026	Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilience and cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791869	REGI	26
23 Jul 2026	Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791875	REGI	31
23 Jul 2026	Cohesion policy in the EU’s eastern border regions: strengthening territorial resilienceand cross-border cooperation REGI-AM-791870	REGI	2
23 Jul 2026	Cohesion policy – the driving force in implementing the EU agenda for cities REGI-AM-791872	REGI	35
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790092	CJ71	11
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790098	CJ71	9
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790101	CJ71	13
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790102	CJ71	13

Show all 70 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Renew Europe Renew · Centre · liberalism, pro-Europeanism

National delegation

Delegation Slovakia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257013?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ”. Member record. memberId 257013. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257013?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257013. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/257013?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-257013,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Ľubica KARVAŠOVÁ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257013?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/257013?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 257013. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/257013. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Renew

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 70

Amendments tabled in committee, 70

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928