Skip to content

Member

Friedrich PÜRNER

No group · Germany

Group
No group NI
Country
Germany
Roll-call participation
85.9 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line
—ⓘ The non-attached have no group line.
More facts (5)
National party
Independent
In office
Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line
—ⓘ The non-attached have no group line.
Committees
ECON, ENVI (substitute), SANT (substitute)
Member id
256969
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

85.9 %

2 484 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

Non-attached median: 85.9 %

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority lineⓘ

—

The non-attached have no group line.

Against clear lineⓘ

—

The non-attached have no group line.

Abstention ⓘ

30.0 %

745 of 2 484 votes cast

Participation 85.9 % — Non-attached median 85.9 %, 31 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 31 members of the Non-attached with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Friedrich PÜRNER85.9 %
Non-attached median85.9 %
Lowest in the group46.3 %
Highest in the group99.6 %
Members31
  • 2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other non-attached members; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.
  • The non-attached have no group line: loyalty and votes against a clear line are not computed.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H 181 for, 399 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G 252 for, 326 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3 381 for, 190 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2 338 for, 233 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1 524 for, 48 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E 84 for, 484 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D 193 for, 389 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D 89 for, 494 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C 204 for, 381 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C 215 for, 366 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C 209 for, 378 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C 95 for, 486 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B 345 for, 242 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A 459 for, 120 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5 439 for, 128 against, 30 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1 392 for, 132 against, 62 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15 448 for, 137 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2 297 for, 267 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 304 for, 268 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14 92 for, 496 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13 330 for, 250 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13 93 for, 493 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 257 for, 331 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2 351 for, 232 against, 3 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13 195 for, 392 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12 390 for, 143 against, 64 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4 441 for, 147 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3 427 for, 166 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12 231 for, 355 against, 12 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 261 for, 335 against, 4 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 259 for, 336 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11 208 for, 382 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 235 for, 358 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 277 for, 321 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3 353 for, 240 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2 363 for, 231 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1 390 for, 205 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9 203 for, 392 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9 266 for, 295 against, 37 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8 215 for, 335 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8 261 for, 316 against, 27 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7 395 for, 204 against, 5 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7 177 for, 418 against, 13 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7 204 for, 395 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 202 for, 380 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7 253 for, 329 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 91 for, 503 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —
17 Sept 2026The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 261 for, 340 against, 6 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: —

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 2 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within No group

No member meets the rule within the group.

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Jan-Peter WARNKE No groupGermany58 % of 4 761 shared44 %
Michael VON DER SCHULENBURG No groupGermany57 % of 4 473 shared44 %
Fabio DE MASI No groupGermany57 % of 4 948 shared44 %
Thomas GEISEL No groupGermany57 % of 4 321 shared44 %
Ruth FIRMENICH No groupGermany56 % of 5 029 shared44 %
Ondřej DOSTÁL No groupCzechia53 % of 4 611 shared44 %
Erik KALIŇÁK No groupSlovakia52 % of 4 622 shared44 %
Kateřina KONEČNÁ No groupCzechia52 % of 4 643 shared44 %
Judita LAŠŠÁKOVÁ No groupSlovakia52 % of 4 701 shared44 %
Fernand KARTHEISER changed group No groupLuxembourg51 % of 4 883 shared45 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
BodyRoleFromTo
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON CommitteeMember19 Jul 2024now
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeSubstitute20 Jan 2025now
Committee on Public HealthSANT CommitteeSubstitute23 Jan 2025now
Delegation for relations with CanadaD-CA DelegationSubstitute19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Delegation to the Pacific-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDPAC Parliamentary assemblyMember19 Sept 2024now
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food SafetyENVI CommitteeSubstitute19 Jul 202419 Jan 2025

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

7 contributions recorded; 9 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
12 Mar 2026Prevention and treatment of obesity (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
26 Nov 2025Protecting citizens' right to make cash payments and ensuring financial inclusion (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
17 Dec 2024Misinformation and disinformation on social media platforms, such as TikTok, and related risks to the integrity of elections in Europe (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
26 Nov 2024Prison conditions in the EU (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
25 Nov 2024Signature of acts adopted in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure (Rule 81) Speech · 1 minRead
7 Oct 2024Facing fake news, populism and disinformation in the EU - the importance of public broadcasting, media pluralism and independent journalism (debate) Speech · 2 minRead
18 Sept 2024EU response to the Mpox outbreak and the need for continuous action (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Show all 7 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 72

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
2 Sept 2026Commission’s basis for publicly attributing the drone incident at Leipzig/Halle Airport to Russia E-10-2026-003464Written questionNot yet answered
2 Sept 2026Basis for the Vice-President / High Representative’s public statements on the drone incident at Leipzig/Halle Airport E-10-2026-003462Written questionNot yet answered
1 Sept 2026Evaluation of national committees of inquiry and transparency of EU pandemic policy E-10-2026-003422Written questionNot yet answered
5 Aug 2026Contradictory reports on the number of returns from Ceuta P-10-2026-003206Priority written question18 Sept 2026
28 Jul 2026Compatibility of lethal police operations with Article 2 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and investigation transparency standards E-10-2026-003153Written question21 Sept 2026
29 Jun 2026Apple Inc. statement that Siri AI won’t be available to EU users on iOS 27 and iPadOS 27 due to the Digital Markets Act E-10-2026-002687Written questionwith 3 co-authors2 Sept 2026
3 Jun 2026MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the quality and timeliness of the European Commission’s replies to Members’ written questions B-10-2026-0271Motion for a resolutionwith 33 co-authors—
21 May 2026Liabilities of each participating Member State for the EUR 90 billion EU loan package for Ukraine E-10-2026-002108Written questionwith 12 co-authors16 Jul 2026
13 May 2026Spain – possible misappropriation of COVID aid E-10-2026-002000Written question8 Jul 2026
11 May 2026Costs in Case T-36/23 Stevi and The New York Times v Commission E-10-2026-001923Written question28 Jul 2026
30 Apr 2026Concerns about the EU’s new age verification app E-10-2026-001771Written questionwith 10 co-authors6 Jul 2026
20 Apr 2026Possible knowledge or involvement of the Ukrainian President in the attack on the Nord Stream pipelines E-10-2026-001605Written question7 Jul 2026
16 Apr 2026Children’s online safety – from bans to proactive protection E-10-2026-001583Written question23 Jun 2026
16 Apr 2026Public launch of a European age verification app for online child protection E-10-2026-001582Written question23 Jun 2026
14 Apr 2026Following up on the answer to question for written answer E-003738/2025 P-10-2026-001510Priority written question20 May 2026
8 Apr 2026De facto mandatory nature of the codes of conduct on disinformation and hate speech E-10-2026-001432Written questionwith 23 co-authors15 Jun 2026
31 Mar 2026Animal welfare and use of EU funds in connection with the treatment of stray dogs in Romania E-10-2026-001332Written questionNot yet answered
23 Mar 2026Impact of the escalation of the war in the Middle East on the supply chains of medical products P-10-2026-001187Priority written question7 May 2026
5 Mar 2026Commission interference: electoral processes inside the EU and political pluralism at risk? E-10-2026-000923Written questionwith 37 co-authors4 May 2026
4 Mar 2026‘One Europe, One Market’, democratic participation and compatibility with EU Treaties E-10-2026-000905Written question21 May 2026
3 Mar 2026Integration of the EU4Health programme into the European Competitiveness Fund E-10-2026-000865Written question9 Jul 2026
5 Feb 2026Compatibility of the EU-India Free Trade Agreement with the Critical Medicines Act E-10-2026-000460Written question1 Apr 2026
26 Jan 2026Post-war prosperity plan for Ukraine E-10-2026-000291Written question7 Apr 2026
13 Jan 2026Retraction of influential glyphosate safety review following litigation disclosures and implications for EU risk assessments E-10-2026-000098Written questionwith 1 co-author23 Mar 2026
5 Jan 2026EUR 90 billion loan for Ukraine P-10-2026-000015Priority written question23 Apr 2026
29 Dec 2025Penalties based on the Digital Services Act against the platform X P-10-2025-005077Priority written questionwith 19 co-authors17 Feb 2026
19 Dec 2025Multi-million euro fine against X to enforce the EU censorship agenda under the guise of alleged violations of transparency obligations under the DSA O-10-2025-000047Oral questionwith 35 co-authorsNot yet answered
19 Dec 2025Whale and dolphin hunting in the Faroe Islands E-10-2025-005028Written questionwith 33 co-authors30 Mar 2026
8 Dec 2025Ban on the sale of nitrous oxide to the general public O-10-2025-000046Oral questionwith 42 co-authorsNot yet answered
4 Dec 2025Ozempic use in the EU E-10-2025-004816Written question30 Jan 2026
20 Nov 2025Dismissal of Italian journalist Gabriele Nunziati and EU double standards on freedom of the press and freedom of expression E-10-2025-004646Written questionwith 26 co-authors7 Apr 2026
19 Nov 2025Protecting citizens’ right to make cash payments and ensuring financial inclusion O-10-2025-000042Oral questionwith 40 co-authorsNot yet answered
14 Nov 2025Establishment of an EU intelligence service E-10-2025-004556Written questionwith 1 co-authorNot yet answered
4 Nov 2025Reassessing the 2035 combustion engine ban in light of advanced biofuels E-10-2025-004328Written questionwith 21 co-authors5 Mar 2026
17 Oct 2025Freedom at risk: who controls the forces behind the European Media Freedom Act and who decides what information is monitored within the EU? E-10-2025-004102Written questionwith 22 co-authors16 Dec 2025
16 Oct 2025Wrongful closure of bank accounts on ideological grounds E-10-2025-004082Written questionwith 22 co-authors17 Nov 2025
2 Oct 2025Costs in Case T-36/23 Stevi and The New York Times v Commission E-10-2025-003842Written question9 Dec 2025
25 Sept 2025Commission President using disappearing messages: impact on transparency and institutional accountability E-10-2025-003738Written question30 Mar 2026
23 Sept 2025Highly concerning comments by VP/HR Kaja Kallas at EUISS event E-10-2025-003692Written questionwith 10 co-authors19 Dec 2025
22 Sept 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on whale and dolphin hunting in the Faroe Islands B-10-2025-0404Motion for a resolutionwith 20 co-authors—
12 Sept 2025EU funding of non-governmental organisations E-10-2025-003526Written questionwith 35 co-authors21 Nov 2025
12 Sept 2025State of the Union address: influencer costs and impact E-10-2025-003525Written question8 Dec 2025
5 Sept 2025Charter flights to EU frontline countries P-10-2025-003450Priority written question28 Oct 2025
3 Sept 2025Follow-up question to question for written answer P-002320/2025 – Consequences in the context of financial support for non-governmental organisations (NGOs) (LIFE programme) E-10-2025-003375Written question12 Nov 2025
11 Aug 2025Deletion of text messages relating to vaccine negotiations (‘Pfizergate’) – amending the Commission’s internal guidelines on keeping records of digital communications E-10-2025-003222Written question12 Nov 2025
5 Aug 2025Deletion of SMS messages relating to vaccine negotiations (‘Pfizergate’) – possible breaches of documentation and transparency obligations P-10-2025-003182Priority written question6 Oct 2025
30 Jul 2025Legal basis and contractual documentation of the EU-US deal on tariffs and trade P-10-2025-003152Priority written question25 Sept 2025
3 Jul 2025Protection of fundamental rights and linguistic minorities in Latvia – the case of Rosļikovs E-10-2025-002726Written questionwith 6 co-authors26 Aug 2025
2 Jul 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on underinvestment in endometriosis research B-10-2025-0309Motion for a resolutionwith 14 co-authors—
2 Jul 2025MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2025-0319Motion for a resolutionwith 76 co-authors—
26 Jun 2025Methodical killing of stray animals in Romania and potential misuse of EU funds E-10-2025-002593Written questionwith 10 co-authors4 Sept 2025
20 Jun 2025NGO funding through the LIFE programme E-10-2025-002493Written questionwith 33 co-authors27 Aug 2025
10 Jun 2025Financial support from the Commission to non-governmental organisations (NGOs) P-10-2025-002320Priority written question28 Jul 2025
10 Jun 2025State of play of the EU accession negotiations with Ukraine versus the Western Balkans E-10-2025-002321Written question29 Sept 2025
27 May 2025Israel’s intention to take full control of the Gaza strip and remove the Palestinian population from the area – EU’s actions and reactions E-10-2025-002127Written questionwith 24 co-authors1 Aug 2025
15 May 2025The slaughter of marine mammals in the Faroe Islands E-10-2025-001959Written questionwith 13 co-authors8 Jul 2025
14 May 2025General Court judgment in Case T-36/23 (Stevi and The New York Times v Commission) P-10-2025-001943Priority written question24 Jun 2025
28 Apr 2025EMA’s role in COVID-19 vaccine approval procedures, inspections and good clinical practice checks P-10-2025-001695Priority written question23 Jun 2025
13 Apr 2025Compliance with the directive on the welfare of pigs E-10-2025-001516Written questionwith 13 co-authors2 Jul 2025
20 Mar 2025A Europe ready for war by 2030 P-10-2025-001202Priority written question4 Jun 2025
13 Mar 2025Decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union on EU-Kingdom of Morocco trade agreements O-10-2025-000008Oral questionwith 36 co-authorsNot yet answered
13 Mar 2025Decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union on EU-Kingdom of Morocco trade agreements O-10-2025-000009Oral questionwith 36 co-authorsNot yet answered
10 Mar 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the deteriorating rule of law situation in Romania B-10-2025-0173Motion for a resolutionwith 8 co-authors—
21 Feb 2025Granting EU funds to media outlets during the European election campaign E-10-2025-000804Written questionNot yet answered
11 Feb 2025Follow-up questions to the question ‘EU Pact on Migration with Tunisia, Mauritania and Morocco – allegations of serious human rights violations’ (P-002453/2024) P-10-2025-000621Priority written question24 Mar 2025
27 Jan 2025Commission funding to environmental NGOs to condition the views of Members of the European Parliament E-10-2025-000357Written questionwith 64 co-authors5 May 2025
2 Dec 2024Potential downgrade of the protection status of the wolf E-10-2024-002717Written questionwith 27 co-authors18 Feb 2025
6 Nov 2024EU Pact on Migration with Tunisia, Mauritania and Morocco – allegations of serious human rights violations P-10-2024-002453Priority written question23 Jan 2025
5 Nov 2024Legal dispute between the Commission and US microprocessor manufacturer Intel E-10-2024-002413Written question10 Jan 2025
22 Oct 2024MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on attacks by Israeli forces on the UN peacekeeping mission in Southern Lebanon B-10-2024-0144Motion for a resolutionwith 8 co-authors—
12 Oct 2024Persistent supply shortages of critical medicinal products in the EU, in particular isotonic saline solution P-10-2024-002037Priority written question28 Nov 2024
26 Sept 2024Authorisation of Mpox vaccines and transparency P-10-2024-001831Priority written question29 Oct 2024

Amendments tabled in committee, 9

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Show all 9 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Germany National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Friedrich PÜRNER”. Member record. memberId 256969. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256969?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256969. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256969?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256969,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Friedrich PÜRNER}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256969?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256969?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256969. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256969. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}