Member

Majdouline SBAI

Greens · France

Group: Greens Verts/ALE
Country: France
Roll-call participation: 20.3 %ⓘ of 261 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.8 % · 2026, final votes
With majority line: 86.8 %ⓘ of 53 votes where the group had a line · Greens median 95.3 %

More facts (5)

National party: Les Écologistes
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 5 of 51 votesⓘ
Committees: ENVI, INTA, SANT (substitute)
Member id: 256917

National party: Les Écologistes
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 5 of 51 votesⓘ
Committees: ENVI, INTA, SANT (substitute)
Member id: 256917

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Roll-call participation ⓘ

20.3 %

53 of 261 final votes while in office

Greens median: 92.5 % (−72.2 pts)

Chamber median: 90.8 %

With majority line ⓘ

86.8 %

46 of 53 votes where their group had a line

Greens median: 95.3 % (−8.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

9.8 %

5 of 51 votes where their group had a clear line

3 opposite (for ↔ against), 2 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

5.7 %

3 of 53 votes cast

Participation 20.3 % — Greens median 92.5 %, 54 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Majdouline SBAI	20.3 %
Greens median	92.5 %
Lowest in the group	20.3 %
Highest in the group	99.6 %
Members	54

With majority line 86.8 % — Greens median 95.3 %, 54 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 54 members of the Greens with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Majdouline SBAI	86.8 %
Greens median	95.3 %
Lowest in the group	81.7 %
Highest in the group	99.3 %
Members	54

2026, 261 final votes; 261 of 342 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of Greens; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 20 of 26 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2026	6	0
21 Jan 2026	8	7
22 Jan 2026	8	0
10 Feb 2026	8	7
11 Feb 2026	10	0
12 Feb 2026	8	0
24 Feb 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	9	0
11 Mar 2026	12	0
12 Mar 2026	6	0
26 Mar 2026	13	0
28 Apr 2026	14	0
29 Apr 2026	17	0
30 Apr 2026	11	0
19 May 2026	3	0
20 May 2026	12	0
21 May 2026	10	0
16 Jun 2026	10	0
17 Jun 2026	16	0
18 Jun 2026	7	0
7 Jul 2026	15	0
8 Jul 2026	15	0
9 Jul 2026	4	0
15 Sept 2026	12	12
16 Sept 2026	16	16
17 Sept 2026	10	10

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Greens

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Mounir SATOURI	Mounir SATOURI	Greens	France	99 % of 2 823 shared	94 %
Select David CORMAND	David CORMAND	Greens	France	97 % of 2 722 shared	94 %
Select Mélissa CAMARA	Mélissa CAMARA	Greens	France	97 % of 2 656 shared	94 %
Select Marie TOUSSAINT	Marie TOUSSAINT	Greens	France	97 % of 2 712 shared	94 %
Select Tilly METZ	Tilly METZ	Greens	Luxembourg	96 % of 2 823 shared	94 %
Select Saskia BRICMONT	Saskia BRICMONT	Greens	Belgium	95 % of 2 610 shared	94 %
Select Sara MATTHIEU	Sara MATTHIEU	Greens	Belgium	94 % of 2 254 shared	94 %
Select Terry REINTKE	Terry REINTKE	Greens	Germany	93 % of 2 499 shared	94 %
Select Maria OHISALO	Maria OHISALO	Greens	Finland	93 % of 2 345 shared	94 %
Select Anna CAVAZZINI	Anna CAVAZZINI	Greens	Germany	92 % of 2 801 shared	94 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Estelle CEULEMANS	Estelle CEULEMANS	S&D	Belgium	86 % of 2 800 shared	83 %
Select Aurore LALUCQ	Aurore LALUCQ	S&D	France	86 % of 2 273 shared	83 %
Select Udo BULLMANN	Udo BULLMANN	S&D	Germany	86 % of 2 267 shared	83 %
Select Chloé RIDEL	Chloé RIDEL	S&D	France	86 % of 2 019 shared	83 %
Select Emma RAFOWICZ	Emma RAFOWICZ	S&D	France	86 % of 2 262 shared	83 %
Select Mohammed CHAHIM	Mohammed CHAHIM	S&D	Netherlands	86 % of 2 759 shared	83 %
Select Marit MAIJ	Marit MAIJ	S&D	Netherlands	85 % of 2 837 shared	83 %
Select Li ANDERSSON	Li ANDERSSON	The Left	Finland	85 % of 2 630 shared	77 %
Select Birgit SIPPEL	Birgit SIPPEL	S&D	Germany	85 % of 2 311 shared	83 %
Select Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	Raphaël GLUCKSMANN	S&D	France	85 % of 2 734 shared	83 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on the Environment, Climate and Food SafetyENVI Committee	Member	20 Jan 2025	now
Committee on International TradeINTA Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Public HealthSANT Committee	Substitute	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation for relations with MercosurDMER Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of South AsiaDSAS Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary AssemblyDLAT Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working group	Member	16 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Children’s RightsIG10-06 Intergroup / working group	Member	19 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on the Social Economy and Services of General InterestIG10-23 Intergroup / working group	Member	30 Jan 2025	now
Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food SafetyENVI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	19 Jan 2025

Show all 11 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	SANT	28 Apr 2026
Amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1252	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	ENVI	24 Mar 2026
Addressing the negative trade-related effects of global overcapacity on the Union steel market	Shadow rapporteur	INTA	19 Mar 2026
Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	SANT	26 Feb 2026
European Chemicals Agency and amending Regulations (EC) No 1907/2006, (EU) No 528/2012, (EU) No 649/2012 and (EU) 2019/1021	Shadow rapporteur	ENVI	11 Dec 2025
Amending Regulations (EC) No 1272/2008, (EC) No 1223/2009 and (EU) 2019/1009 as regards simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products	Shadow rapporteur	ENVI	11 Dec 2025
Ensuring faster registration and uptake of biological control agents	Shadow rapporteur	ENVI	7 Jul 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation	INTA	24 Jun 2025
Product safety and regulatory compliance in e-commerce and non-EU imports	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	INTA	19 Mar 2025
Applying a generalized scheme of tariff preferences and repealing Regulation (EU) No 978/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council	Rapporteur	INTA	18 Feb 2025

Show all 11 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

28 contributions recorded; 3 on behalf of their group; 33 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
10 Jul 2025	Endometriosis: Europe’s wake-up call on the gender health gap (debate) on behalf of Greens	Speech · 2 min	Read
8 Jul 2025	EU-China relations (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2025	Product safety and regulatory compliance in e-commerce and non-EU imports (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2025	Situation in the Middle East (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 May 2025	Competition policy – annual report 2024 (A10-0071/2025 - Lara Wolters) (vote)	Speech · 1 min	Read
2 Apr 2025	Energy-intensive industries (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
2 Apr 2025	European Steel and Metals Action Plan (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
12 Mar 2025	Social and employment aspects of restructuring processes: the need to protect jobs and workers’ rights (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
12 Mar 2025	Action Plan for the Automotive Industry (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Mar 2025	Clean Industrial Deal (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 28 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 83

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
10 Sept 2026	EU exports of banned pesticides E-10-2026-003605	Written questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
8 Sept 2026	Chatbots directing women with unwanted pregnancies to anti-abortion websites E-10-2026-003539	Written questionwith 67 co-authors	Not yet answered
7 Sept 2026	Climate change, public health and the world of work: for a directive on maximum working temperatures O-10-2026-000035	Oral questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
22 Jul 2026	Cutro shipwreck, tragedies at sea and the right of vicitms’ families E-10-2026-003097	Written questionwith 23 co-authors	22 Sept 2026
14 Jul 2026	State of play of negotiations on the agreement on the exchange of personal data between Europol and Israel E-10-2026-002925	Written questionwith 24 co-authors	1 Sept 2026
8 Jul 2026	European funds allocated to fighting period poverty E-10-2026-002822	Written questionwith 36 co-authors	Not yet answered
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
18 Jun 2026	Procedural irregularities surrounding the case of the ‘Ulm 5’ activists in Germany E-10-2026-002533	Written questionwith 20 co-authors	2 Sept 2026
17 Jun 2026	Anti-dumping complaint against Chinese imports of 6-aminopenicillanic acid, a key ingredient for producing amoxicillin E-10-2026-002527	Written questionwith 5 co-authors	3 Sept 2026
16 Jun 2026	Visa ban for (ex-)combatants of armed forces implicated in serious violations E-10-2026-002483	Written questionwith 23 co-authors	30 Jul 2026

Show all 83 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 13

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
26 Mar 2026	Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 ENVI-AM-786770	ENVI	10
6 Mar 2026	Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions SANT-AM-785316	SANT	33
2 Mar 2026	Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities, repealing Regulations (EU) 2021/522, (EU) 2021/694, (EU) 2021/697, (EU) 2021/783, and amending Regulations (EU) 2021/696, (EU) 2023/588, (EU) [EDIP] SANT-AM-785240	SANT	45
24 Feb 2026	Amending Regulations (EC) No 1272/2008, (EC) No 1223/2009 and (EU) 2019/1009 as regards simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products CJ45-AM-784369	CJ45	23
10 Feb 2026	Amending Regulations (EC) No 1272/2008, (EC) No 1223/2009 and (EU) 2019/1009 as regards simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products CJ45-AM-784370	CJ45	11
6 Feb 2026	Amending Regulations (EC) No 1272/2008, (EC) No 1223/2009 and (EU) 2019/1009 as regards simplification of certain requirements and procedures for chemical products CJ45-AM-784152	CJ45	15
4 Feb 2026	European Chemicals Agency and amending Regulations (EC) No 1907/2006, (EU) No 528/2012, (EU) No 649/2012 and (EU) 2019/1021 ENVI-AM-784247	ENVI	12
5 Dec 2025	Addressing the negative trade-related effects of global overcapacity on the Union steel market INTA-AM-781298	INTA	21
27 Nov 2025	Implementing the bilateral safeguard clause of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement and the EU-Mercosur Interim Trade Agreement for agricultural products INTA-AM-781134	INTA	24
23 Jul 2025	Ensuring faster registration and uptake of biological control agents CJ14-AM-775563	CJ14	35

Show all 13 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Greens / European Free Alliance Greens · Centre-left · green politics, regionalism

National delegation

Delegation France National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256917?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Majdouline SBAI”. Member record. memberId 256917. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256917?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256917. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256917?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-256917,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Majdouline SBAI}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256917?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256917?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256917. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256917. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Greens

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 83

Amendments tabled in committee, 13

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928