Member

Rima HASSAN

The Left · France

Group: The Left
Country: France
Roll-call participation: 85.2 %ⓘ of 2 521 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.9 % · 2026, roll calls
With majority line: 95.3 %ⓘ of 2 141 votes where the group had a line · The Left median 93.6 %

More facts (5)

National party: LFI La France Insoumise
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 27 of 2 000 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET, BUDG (substitute)
Member id: 256912

National party: LFI La France Insoumise
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 27 of 2 000 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET, BUDG (substitute)
Member id: 256912

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Roll-call participation ⓘ

85.2 %

2 148 of 2 521 roll calls while in office

The Left median: 88.2 % (−3.0 pts)

Chamber median: 90.9 %

With majority line ⓘ

95.3 %

2 041 of 2 141 votes where their group had a line

The Left median: 93.6 % (+1.8 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

1.4 %

27 of 2 000 votes where their group had a clear line

12 opposite (for ↔ against), 14 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

5.1 %

109 of 2 148 votes cast

Participation 85.2 % — The Left median 88.2 %, 46 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 46 members of the The Left with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Rima HASSAN	85.2 %
The Left median	88.2 %
Lowest in the group	46.5 %
Highest in the group	99.5 %
Members	46

With majority line 95.3 % — The Left median 93.6 %, 46 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 46 members of the The Left with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Rima HASSAN	95.3 %
The Left median	93.6 %
Lowest in the group	81.8 %
Highest in the group	96.8 %
Members	46

2026, 2 521 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of The Left; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 6 of 34 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2026	67	66
21 Jan 2026	112	96
22 Jan 2026	58	56
9 Feb 2026	2	0
10 Feb 2026	38	33
11 Feb 2026	13	11
12 Feb 2026	141	138
24 Feb 2026	43	41
9 Mar 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	197	175
11 Mar 2026	60	59
12 Mar 2026	34	33
25 Mar 2026	3	3
26 Mar 2026	69	67
27 Apr 2026	2	2
28 Apr 2026	225	221
29 Apr 2026	296	286
30 Apr 2026	68	51
18 May 2026	4	4
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	94
21 May 2026	98	93
15 Jun 2026	2	0
16 Jun 2026	40	40
17 Jun 2026	127	122
18 Jun 2026	77	73
6 Jul 2026	2	0
7 Jul 2026	72	0
8 Jul 2026	144	136
9 Jul 2026	67	67
14 Sept 2026	1	0
15 Sept 2026	155	0
16 Sept 2026	80	75
17 Sept 2026	124	102

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within The Left

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Anthony SMITH	Anthony SMITH	The Left	France	100 % of 4 302 shared	87 %
Select Marina MESURE	Marina MESURE	The Left	France	100 % of 4 416 shared	87 %
Select Emma FOURREAU	Emma FOURREAU	The Left	France	99 % of 4 332 shared	87 %
Select Leila CHAIBI	Leila CHAIBI	The Left	France	99 % of 4 394 shared	87 %
Select Arash SAEIDI	Arash SAEIDI	The Left	France	99 % of 3 469 shared	87 %
Select Damien CARÊME	Damien CARÊME	The Left	France	99 % of 3 817 shared	87 %
Select Manon AUBRY	Manon AUBRY	The Left	France	98 % of 4 353 shared	87 %
Select Younous OMARJEE	Younous OMARJEE	The Left	France	95 % of 3 379 shared	87 %
Select Mimmo LUCANO	Mimmo LUCANO	The Left	Italy	93 % of 2 122 shared	87 %
Select Martin GÜNTHER	Martin GÜNTHER	The Left	Germany	93 % of 2 339 shared	87 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Greens	Spain	87 % of 3 482 shared	77 %
Select Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Greens	Spain	86 % of 4 309 shared	77 %
Select Benedetta SCUDERI	Benedetta SCUDERI	Greens	Italy	85 % of 4 463 shared	77 %
Select Cristina GUARDA	Cristina GUARDA	Greens	Italy	84 % of 3 753 shared	77 %
Select David CORMAND	David CORMAND	Greens	France	84 % of 4 331 shared	77 %
Select Mélissa CAMARA	Mélissa CAMARA	Greens	France	84 % of 3 848 shared	77 %
Select Diana RIBA I GINER	Diana RIBA I GINER	Greens	Spain	84 % of 3 874 shared	77 %
Select Saskia BRICMONT	Saskia BRICMONT	Greens	Belgium	84 % of 4 144 shared	77 %
Select Marie TOUSSAINT	Marie TOUSSAINT	Greens	France	83 % of 4 164 shared	77 %
Select Leoluca ORLANDO	Leoluca ORLANDO	Greens	Italy	83 % of 3 847 shared	77 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on BudgetsBUDG Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Subcommittee on Human RightsDROI Subcommittee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation for relations with PalestineDPAL Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the OACPS-EU Joint Parliamentary AssemblyDACP Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	7 Oct 2024	now
Delegation to the Africa-EU Parliamentary AssemblyDAFR Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the MediterraneanDMED Parliamentary assembly	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Anti-Racism and DiversityIG10-02 Intergroup / working group	Chair co	14 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on Fighting against PovertyIG10-12 Intergroup / working group	Member	24 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Mental HealthIG10-17 Intergroup / working group	Member	5 Feb 2025	now

Show all 12 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
EU-Syria political relations	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	1 Jun 2026
Towards an EU strategy to protect and strengthen the international justice system and its institutions, mechanisms and partners	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	14 Apr 2026
The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report – annual report 2025	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	BUDG	12 Dec 2025
DEVE MISSION TO DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO	Official delegation		13 Oct 2025
Human Rights and Democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	9 Sept 2025
Addressing transnational repression of human rights defenders	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	5 May 2025
Amending Directives 2006/43/EC, 2013/34/EU, (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	AFET	8 Apr 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation	DROI	8 Apr 2025
Implementation of the rule of law conditionality regime	Shadow rapporteur	BUDG	26 Mar 2025
AFET Opinion on providing macro-financial assistance to the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan AFET/10/00377 -2024/0086(COD) - COM(2024)0159	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	25 Nov 2024

Show all 11 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

35 contributions recorded; 9 on behalf of their group; 49 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro on behalf of The Left	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Jun 2026	The role of the EU in efforts for peace and stability throughout the Middle East after the announced deal between the US and Iran (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 May 2026	Political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
18 May 2026	Order of business on behalf of The Left	Speech	Read
29 Apr 2026	Escalating trafficking and exploitation by criminal groups in Haiti	Speech · 2 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	Situation in Lebanon: implementation of the ceasefire, support peace efforts and humanitarian access (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Mar 2026	Rise of political violence, notably by far-left organisations (debate) on behalf of The Left	Speech · 2 min	Read
10 Feb 2026	Urgent need to address the humanitarian catastrophe in Sudan and to achieve a sustainable peace (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 Jan 2026	Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025 (debate) on behalf of The Left	Speech · 2 min	Read
16 Dec 2025	Recent developments in Palestine and Lebanon (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 35 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 123

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
15 Sept 2026	Common security and defence policy mission to Lebanon E-10-2026-003673	Written questionwith 11 co-authors	Not yet answered
7 Sept 2026	Climate change, public health and the world of work: for a directive on maximum working temperatures O-10-2026-000035	Oral questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
1 Sept 2026	Serious statements by Markus Lammert regarding the expulsion of unaccompanied children and persons in need of international protection in Ceuta E-10-2026-003413	Written questionwith 15 co-authors	Not yet answered
22 Jul 2026	Israel’s destruction of the Gazan fisheries sector E-10-2026-003095	Written questionwith 1 co-author	Not yet answered
22 Jul 2026	Cutro shipwreck, tragedies at sea and the right of vicitms’ families E-10-2026-003097	Written questionwith 23 co-authors	22 Sept 2026
7 Jul 2026	Transparency regarding EU-funded infrastructure destroyed in Gaza E-10-2026-002805	Written questionwith 39 co-authors	4 Sept 2026
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
25 Jun 2026	The recent coercive measures imposed by the United States against Cuba, their extraterritorial nature and the measures to be adopted to defend the interests of individuals and companies from EU countries O-10-2026-000029	Oral questionwith 27 co-authors	Not yet answered
24 Jun 2026	ECB’s decision to raise interest rates and its impact on the rising cost of living O-10-2026-000028	Oral questionwith 39 co-authors	Not yet answered
17 Jun 2026	Systematic sexualised torture against Palestinian detainees E-10-2026-002515	Written questionwith 23 co-authors	12 Aug 2026

Show all 123 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 27

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
4 Sept 2026	Shaping the EU's external action to address the human rights challenges posed by artificial intelligence AFET-AM-792029	AFET	10
4 Sept 2026	Shaping the EU's external action to address the human rights challenges posed by artificial intelligence AFET-AM-792048	AFET	32
16 Jul 2026	General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections AFET-AM-791057	AFET	1
10 Jul 2026	Towards an EU strategy to protect and strengthen the international justice system and its institutions, mechanisms and partners AFET-AM-790940	AFET	37
15 Jun 2026	EU-Syria political relations AFET-AM-789951	AFET	32
14 Apr 2026	Recommendation for the Council, for the Commission and for the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the changing geopolitical situation in East Asia and the need for closer cooperation with like-minded partners in the region AFET-AM-787006	AFET	8
31 Mar 2026	Amending Decision (EU) 2021/1764 on the Association of the Overseas Countries and Territories with the European Union including relations between the European Union on the one hand, and Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark on the other AFET-AM-786829	AFET	2
11 Mar 2026	2025 Commission report on Montenegro AFET-AM-785313	AFET	1
5 Mar 2026	Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union on Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peace AFET-AM-785315	AFET	19
22 Oct 2025	Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing HOUS-AM-778374	HOUS	24

Show all 27 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL) The Left · Left · democratic socialism, communism

National delegation

Delegation France National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256912?period=2026&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Rima HASSAN”. Member record. memberId 256912. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256912?period=2026&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256912. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256912?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-256912,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Rima HASSAN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256912?period=2026&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256912?period=2026&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256912. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256912. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within The Left

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 123

Amendments tabled in committee, 27

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928