Skip to content

Member · Former member

Filip TUREK

Patriots · Czechia · left on 3 October 2025

Group
Patriots PfE
Country
Czechia
Roll-call participation
91.3 %ⓘ of 2 298 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.2 % · whole term, roll calls
With majority line
75.3 %ⓘ of 2 091 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 82.7 %
More facts (4)
National party
AUTO Motoristé sobě
In office
16 Jul 2024 – 3 Oct 2025 (left on 3 October 2025)
Against clear line
272 of 1 623 votesⓘ
Member id
256850
More

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Roll-call participation ⓘ

91.3 %

2 099 of 2 298 roll calls while in office

Patriots median: 91.1 % (+0.2 pts)

Chamber median: 90.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

75.3 %

1 574 of 2 091 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 82.7 % (−7.4 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

16.8 %

272 of 1 623 votes where their group had a clear line

158 opposite (for ↔ against), 71 abstained against the line, 43 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

6.6 %

138 of 2 099 votes cast

Participation 91.3 % — Patriots median 91.1 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
Participation among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureParticipation
Filip TUREK91.3 %
Patriots median91.1 %
Lowest in the group44.5 %
Highest in the group99.9 %
Members89
With majority line 75.3 % — Patriots median 82.7 %, 89 members.ⓘ
Data as a table
With majority line among the 89 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
FigureWith majority line
Filip TUREK75.3 %
Patriots median82.7 %
Lowest in the group72.5 %
Highest in the group92.9 %
Members89
  • Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
  • “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
  • A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 2 298

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
DateDecision and voteResultPositionMajority line
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 2 553 for, 82 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 1 626 for, 20 against, 6 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 61 464 for, 179 against, 8 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 59 — part 2 448 for, 190 against, 10 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 58 — part 2 456 for, 187 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 56 530 for, 78 against, 40 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 54 440 for, 201 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Separate vote on paragraph 53 613 for, 24 against, 9 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 46 — part 2 475 for, 152 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 39 254 for, 327 against, 66 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 8 to paragraph 39 228 for, 413 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 261 for, 365 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 13 — part 2 475 for, 149 against, 21 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 5 to paragraph 11 92 for, 521 against, 29 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 8 — part 2 457 for, 178 against, 9 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 6 362 for, 226 against, 54 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 3 to paragraph 4 319 for, 295 against, 36 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 3 — part 2 497 for, 126 against, 23 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Paragraph 3 — part 1 603 for, 29 against, 18 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Public procurement Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 2 183 for, 416 against, 47 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) Final vote — text as a wholeAdopted 434 for, 49 against, 168 abstainedPosition: Abstained Majority line: Abstained
9 Sept 2025EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (Resolution) Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 12 72 for, 522 against, 51 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: Abstained
9 Sept 2025EU-Kyrgyz Republic Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 473 for, 114 against, 58 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025EU-Brazil Agreement: cooperation with and through Europol and the Federal Police of Brazil Final vote on the draft Council decisionConsent given 606 for, 5 against, 19 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Final votePassed 431 for, 145 against, 76 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 395 to recital 19 187 for, 442 against, 16 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendments 409 + 417 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 16 208 for, 431 against, 7 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 371 to Annex VII, Part C, point 13 530 for, 112 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendments 408 + 416 (voted as one) to Annex VII, Part C, point 6 204 for, 438 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 407 to Annex VII, Part C, point 4 137 for, 447 against, 61 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 318 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 512 for, 120 against, 14 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 390 to Article 55, après le paragraph 2 105 for, 538 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 389 to Article 38, paragraph 3, après le point b 96 for, 549 against, 3 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 388 to Article 18, paragraph 1 124 for, 515 against, 7 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 387 to Article 7, après le paragraph 4 207 for, 431 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 2 451 for, 182 against, 10 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 137 to Article 6, paragraph 3, alinéa 1 — part 1 461 for, 185 against, 5 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 394 to Article 6, paragraph 1, après l'alinéa 2 142 for, 496 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 403 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 2 192 for, 442 against, 11 abstainedPosition: Against ≠ groupMajority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 130 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 444 for, 189 against, 14 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 402 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 194 for, 434 against, 15 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 393 to Article 6, paragraph 1, alinéa 1 120 for, 529 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 2 438 for, 196 against, 8 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 150 to Article 6 — part 1 452 for, 195 against, 2 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 134 to Article 6 473 for, 154 against, 22 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 2 512 for, 122 against, 15 abstainedPosition: No vote recorded Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 133 to Article 6 — part 1 505 for, 126 against, 19 abstainedPosition: Against Majority line: Against
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 401 to Article 6 131 for, 447 against, 72 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 392 to Article 4, après le paragraph 1 138 for, 504 against, 4 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For
9 Sept 2025Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles Amendment 391 to Article 4, paragraph 1, après le point b 138 for, 508 against, 2 abstainedPosition: For Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 17 of 56 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Anna BRYŁKA changed group PatriotsPoland74 % of 1 650 shared74 %
Tiago MOREIRA DE SÁ PatriotsPortugal74 % of 1 972 shared74 %
Tomasz BUCZEK changed group PatriotsPoland73 % of 1 982 shared74 %
Tom VANDENDRIESSCHE PatriotsBelgium73 % of 2 093 shared74 %
Anna Maria CISINT PatriotsItaly73 % of 1 499 shared74 %
António TÂNGER CORRÊA PatriotsPortugal72 % of 2 020 shared74 %
Barbara BONTE PatriotsBelgium72 % of 1 997 shared74 %
Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA PatriotsSpain72 % of 2 039 shared74 %
Pierre PIMPIE PatriotsFrance72 % of 1 956 shared74 %
Gerolf ANNEMANS PatriotsBelgium72 % of 1 810 shared74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
SelectMemberGroupCountryAgreementBaseline
Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group ESNGermany72 % of 954 shared65 %
Guillaume PELTIER ECRFrance72 % of 1 561 shared68 %
Hans NEUHOFF ESNGermany71 % of 1 619 shared70 %
Sarah KNAFO ESNFrance71 % of 2 006 shared70 %
Nicolas BAY ECRFrance70 % of 1 916 shared68 %
Markus BUCHHEIT ESNGermany70 % of 1 832 shared70 %
Marc JONGEN ESNGermany70 % of 1 796 shared70 %
Laurence TROCHU ECRFrance70 % of 2 012 shared68 %
Siegbert Frank DROESE ESNGermany70 % of 1 687 shared70 %
René AUST ESNGermany70 % of 1 856 shared70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

6 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 8 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
DateDebateKindVerbatim
10 Sept 2025After 10 years, time to end mass migration now - protect our women and children (topical debate) Speech · 1 minRead
9 Sept 2025Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: simplification and strengthening (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
8 Jul 2025Need for the EU to scale up clean technologies (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
12 Mar 2025Action Plan for the Automotive Industry (debate) Speech · 1 minRead
27 Nov 2024Topical debate (Rule 169) - Budapest Declaration on the New European Competitiveness Deal - A future for the farming and manufacturing sectors in the EU (topical debate) on behalf of PatriotsSpeech · 3 minRead
8 Oct 2024The crisis facing the EU’s automotive industry, potential plant closures and the need to enhance competitiveness and maintain jobs in Europe (debate) Speech · 1 minRead

Questions and motions, 50

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
DateTitleKindAnswer
23 Sept 2025MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the brutal murders of Ukrainian refugee Iryna Zarutska and US political activist Charlie Kirk, and the need to defend vulnerable individuals and uphold law and order B-10-2025-0405Motion for a resolutionwith 82 co-authors—
22 Sept 2025Risk of unfair competition due to method of calculating tyre emissions E-10-2025-003665Written questionwith 14 co-authors3 Dec 2025
18 Sept 2025Classification of political expressions and satire under the Digital Services Act E-10-2025-003616Written questionwith 39 co-authors18 Nov 2025
12 Sept 2025MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2025-0400Motion for a resolutionwith 84 co-authors—
12 Sept 2025EU funding of non-governmental organisations E-10-2025-003526Written questionwith 35 co-authors21 Nov 2025
16 Jul 2025Missing CBAM benchmark values and impending competitive disadvantages for European companies E-10-2025-002914Written question8 Sept 2025
2 Jul 2025MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION B-10-2025-0319Motion for a resolutionwith 76 co-authors—
20 Jun 2025NGO funding through the LIFE programme E-10-2025-002493Written questionwith 33 co-authors27 Aug 2025
19 Jun 2025Delegated act on low carbon hydrogen E-10-2025-002477Written question14 Aug 2025
18 Jun 2025Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/1184 on renewable fuels of non-biological origin E-10-2025-002461Written question31 Jul 2025

Show all 50 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 49

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
DateText amendedCommitteeAmendments
23 Sept 2025Laying a framework for strengthening the availability and security of supply of critical medicinal products as well as the availability of, and accessibility of, medicinal products of common interest, and amending Regulation (EU) 2024/795 ENVI-AM-776969 ENVI5
2 Sept 2025Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality ITRE-AM-776811 ITRE1
16 Jul 2025General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 - all sections ENVI-AM-775712 ENVI7
10 Jul 2025Protection of minors online IMCO-AM-774602 IMCO2
2 Jul 2025on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2021/694, (EU) 2021/695, (EU) 2021/697, (EU) 2021/1153, (EU) 2023/1525 and 2024/795, as regards incentivising defence-related investments in the EU budget to implement the ReArm Europe Plan ITRE-AM-775462 ITRE11
30 Jun 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) ENVI-AM-775454 ENVI7
30 Jun 2025UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30) ENVI-AM-775453 ENVI2
4 Jun 2025Public interface connected to the Internal Market Information System for the declaration of posting of workers and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 CJ52-AM-774328 CJ526
4 Jun 2025Public interface connected to the Internal Market Information System for the declaration of posting of workers and amending Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 CJ52-AM-774325 CJ5214
22 May 2025Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement ITRE-AM-773329 ITRE6

Show all 49 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

National delegation

  • Delegation Czechia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Filip TUREK”. Member record. memberId 256850. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256850?page=4&speeches=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256850. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256850?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256850,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Filip TUREK}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256850?page=4&speeches=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256850?page=4&speeches=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256850. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256850. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}