Member · Former member
Filip TUREK
Patriots · Czechia · left on 3 October 2025
Record
The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.
Roll-call participation ⓘ
91.3 %
2 099 of 2 298 roll calls while in office
Patriots median: 91.1 % (+0.2 pts)
Chamber median: 90.2 %
With majority line ⓘ
75.3 %
1 574 of 2 091 votes where their group had a line
Patriots median: 82.7 % (−7.4 pts)
158 opposite (for ↔ against), 71 abstained against the line, 43 voted for or against when the line was to abstain
Data as a table
| Figure | Participation |
|---|---|
| Filip TUREK | 91.3 % |
| Patriots median | 91.1 % |
| Lowest in the group | 44.5 % |
| Highest in the group | 99.9 % |
| Members | 89 |
Data as a table
| Figure | With majority line |
|---|---|
| Filip TUREK | 75.3 % |
| Patriots median | 82.7 % |
| Lowest in the group | 72.5 % |
| Highest in the group | 92.9 % |
| Members | 89 |
- Whole term, 5 928 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
- “No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
- A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.
Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.
| Date | Decision and vote | Result | Position | Majority line |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2025 | Amending ERDF, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review Proposal to vote on amendments | 151 for, 495 against, 19 abstained | Position: For ≠ group | Majority line: Against |
| 10 Sept 2025 | Amending ERDF, Cohesion Fund and Just Transition Fund as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review Amendments 79 + 81 (voted as one) | 136 for, 504 against, 27 abstained | Position: For ≠ group | Majority line: Against |
| 10 Sept 2025 | European Social Fund (ESF+): specific measures to address strategic challenges Final vote on the provisional agreement | Passed 453 for, 149 against, 59 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | 2023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Final vote — text as a whole | Adopted 418 for, 135 against, 41 abstained | Position: Abstained ≠ group | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | 2023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Amendment 1, adding text after recital AA | 113 for, 475 against, 43 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | 2023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Amendment 3, adding text after recital W | 255 for, 252 against, 132 abstained | Position: For ≠ group | Majority line: Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 | 2023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Amendment 39, adding text after recital Q | 77 for, 491 against, 62 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 | 2023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Separate vote on paragraph 84 | 335 for, 272 against, 21 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | 2023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Paragraph 67 — part 2 | 428 for, 173 against, 34 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | 2023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 65 | 127 for, 473 against, 19 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | 2023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 45 | 191 for, 296 against, 143 abstained | Position: For ≠ group | Majority line: Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 | 2023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 43 | 79 for, 460 against, 88 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 | 2023 and 2024 reports on Ukraine Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 | 365 for, 182 against, 56 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Final vote — text as a whole | Adopted 432 for, 95 against, 124 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 23, adding text after recital AG | 250 for, 384 against, 12 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Recital AH — part 2 of 2 | 448 for, 186 against, 10 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 21, adding text after recital AE | 254 for, 356 against, 37 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Separate vote on recital AA | 415 for, 215 against, 10 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Separate vote on recital AA | 430 for, 183 against, 6 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Separate vote on recital AA | 590 for, 36 against, 12 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 39, adding text after recital R | 142 for, 420 against, 78 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 2, adding text after recital N | 288 for, 273 against, 74 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 1, adding text after recital N | 307 for, 280 against, 53 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 29, adding text after recital L | 114 for, 450 against, 77 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Separate vote on recital H | 564 for, 52 against, 28 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Recital E — part 3 of 3 | 481 for, 157 against, 4 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 86 — part 2 | 450 for, 183 against, 9 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 28, adding text after paragraph 82 | 264 for, 373 against, 10 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 20 to paragraph 75 | 227 for, 390 against, 31 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 71 — part 2 | 457 for, 179 against, 5 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 71 — part 1 | 601 for, 28 against, 17 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 67 | 307 for, 293 against, 44 abstained | Position: Abstained ≠ group | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 47 to paragraph 67 | 322 for, 261 against, 63 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 37 to paragraph 67 | 280 for, 338 against, 28 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 18 to paragraph 67 | 118 for, 429 against, 99 abstained | Position: Abstained | Majority line: Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 66 | 145 for, 439 against, 59 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: For |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 35 to paragraph 66 | 236 for, 369 against, 43 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 65 — part 2 | 444 for, 185 against, 6 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 65 — part 1 | 554 for, 40 against, 52 abstained | Position: For | Majority line: Abstained |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 36 to paragraph 65 | 225 for, 419 against, 4 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 34 to paragraph 65 | 223 for, 411 against, 9 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 64 | 255 for, 361 against, 31 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 17 to paragraph 64 | 224 for, 420 against, 6 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 63 | 255 for, 361 against, 33 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 63 | 217 for, 419 against, 11 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 63 | 219 for, 423 against, 6 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 63 | 226 for, 414 against, 7 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 63 | 224 for, 410 against, 11 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 63 | 250 for, 391 against, 8 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: Against |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Public procurement Paragraph 63 — part 3 | 554 for, 61 against, 36 abstained | Position: Against | Majority line: For |
Roll-call participation
One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.
"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
Data as a table
| Sitting | Roll calls | Voted in |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Jul 2024 | 23 | 12 |
| 18 Jul 2024 | 1 | 0 |
| 16 Sept 2024 | 2 | 0 |
| 18 Sept 2024 | 2 | 2 |
| 19 Sept 2024 | 92 | 82 |
| 7 Oct 2024 | 2 | 0 |
| 8 Oct 2024 | 1 | 1 |
| 9 Oct 2024 | 18 | 15 |
| 10 Oct 2024 | 4 | 4 |
| 21 Oct 2024 | 2 | 0 |
| 22 Oct 2024 | 10 | 9 |
| 23 Oct 2024 | 129 | 124 |
| 24 Oct 2024 | 13 | 13 |
| 13 Nov 2024 | 2 | 2 |
| 14 Nov 2024 | 36 | 36 |
| 25 Nov 2024 | 2 | 0 |
| 26 Nov 2024 | 18 | 18 |
| 27 Nov 2024 | 11 | 11 |
| 28 Nov 2024 | 57 | 55 |
| 17 Dec 2024 | 13 | 12 |
| 18 Dec 2024 | 33 | 33 |
| 19 Dec 2024 | 45 | 43 |
| 20 Jan 2025 | 2 | 0 |
| 21 Jan 2025 | 1 | 0 |
| 22 Jan 2025 | 2 | 0 |
| 23 Jan 2025 | 45 | 0 |
| 10 Feb 2025 | 1 | 0 |
| 11 Feb 2025 | 32 | 31 |
| 12 Feb 2025 | 10 | 10 |
| 13 Feb 2025 | 30 | 30 |
| 10 Mar 2025 | 2 | 0 |
| 11 Mar 2025 | 9 | 9 |
| 12 Mar 2025 | 228 | 220 |
| 13 Mar 2025 | 24 | 23 |
| 31 Mar 2025 | 3 | 0 |
| 1 Apr 2025 | 35 | 35 |
| 2 Apr 2025 | 251 | 245 |
| 3 Apr 2025 | 62 | 62 |
| 5 May 2025 | 5 | 0 |
| 6 May 2025 | 10 | 10 |
| 7 May 2025 | 220 | 217 |
| 8 May 2025 | 103 | 100 |
| 21 May 2025 | 2 | 0 |
| 22 May 2025 | 53 | 0 |
| 16 Jun 2025 | 2 | 0 |
| 17 Jun 2025 | 41 | 41 |
| 18 Jun 2025 | 91 | 89 |
| 19 Jun 2025 | 87 | 82 |
| 7 Jul 2025 | 1 | 1 |
| 8 Jul 2025 | 55 | 54 |
| 9 Jul 2025 | 134 | 131 |
| 10 Jul 2025 | 36 | 36 |
| 8 Sept 2025 | 1 | 0 |
| 9 Sept 2025 | 101 | 100 |
| 10 Sept 2025 | 34 | 34 |
| 11 Sept 2025 | 69 | 67 |
Voting neighbours
Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.
Work
Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.
Dossiers
No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.
Topics they work on (model-assigned)
- Economy & single market 32
- Climate & environment 23
- Transport & tourism 14
- Justice, rule of law & rights 11
- EU budget & funds 10
- Energy 10
- EU institutions & Parliament 7
- Digital, AI & data 6
- Foreign affairs 6
- Defence & security 4
- Health 4
- Trade & customs 4
- Migration & asylum 3
- Jobs, social affairs & equality 2
- Agriculture, food & fisheries 1
Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.
In the chamber
Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.
6 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 8 minutes of speaking time.
| Date | Debate | Kind | Verbatim |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2025 | After 10 years, time to end mass migration now - protect our women and children (topical debate) | Speech · 1 min | Read |
| 9 Sept 2025 | Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: simplification and strengthening (debate) | Speech · 1 min | Read |
| 8 Jul 2025 | Need for the EU to scale up clean technologies (debate) | Speech · 1 min | Read |
| 12 Mar 2025 | Action Plan for the Automotive Industry (debate) | Speech · 1 min | Read |
| 27 Nov 2024 | Topical debate (Rule 169) - Budapest Declaration on the New European Competitiveness Deal - A future for the farming and manufacturing sectors in the EU (topical debate) on behalf of Patriots | Speech · 3 min | Read |
| 8 Oct 2024 | The crisis facing the EU’s automotive industry, potential plant closures and the need to enhance competitiveness and maintain jobs in Europe (debate) | Speech · 1 min | Read |
Questions and motions, 50
Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.
Amendments tabled in committee, 49
Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.
Connections
Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.
Political group
- Group Patriots for Europe Patriots · Far-right · national conservatism, right-wing populism
National delegation
- Delegation Czechia National delegation
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Official source
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 25 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Filip TUREK”. Member record. memberId 256850. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256850?page=3&speeches=all&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256850. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256850?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-member-256850,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Filip TUREK}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256850?page=3&speeches=all&vscope=all}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256850?page=3&speeches=all&vscope=all},
urldate = {2026-09-25},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Member record. memberId 256850. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256850. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}