Member

Ondřej KOLÁŘ

EPP · Czechia

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Czechia
Roll-call participation: 97.7 %ⓘ of 261 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.8 % · 2026, final votes
With majority line: 98.0 %ⓘ of 255 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 94.9 %

More facts (5)

National party: TOP09/STAN TOP 09
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 1 of 242 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET, DEVE (substitute), LIBE (substitute)
Member id: 256846

National party: TOP09/STAN TOP 09
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 1 of 242 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET, DEVE (substitute), LIBE (substitute)
Member id: 256846

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Roll-call participation ⓘ

97.7 %

255 of 261 final votes while in office

EPP median: 91.2 % (+6.5 pts)

Chamber median: 90.8 %

With majority line ⓘ

98.0 %

250 of 255 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 94.9 % (+3.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

0.4 %

1 of 242 votes where their group had a clear line

0 opposite (for ↔ against), 1 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.6 %

4 of 255 votes cast

Participation 97.7 % — EPP median 91.2 %, 187 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 187 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Ondřej KOLÁŘ	97.7 %
EPP median	91.2 %
Lowest in the group	3.8 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	187

With majority line 98.0 % — EPP median 94.9 %, 185 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 185 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Ondřej KOLÁŘ	98.0 %
EPP median	94.9 %
Lowest in the group	73.6 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	185

2026, 261 final votes; 261 of 342 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 0 of 26 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2026	6	6
21 Jan 2026	8	8
22 Jan 2026	8	8
10 Feb 2026	8	8
11 Feb 2026	10	10
12 Feb 2026	8	8
24 Feb 2026	1	1
10 Mar 2026	9	8
11 Mar 2026	12	12
12 Mar 2026	6	6
26 Mar 2026	13	12
28 Apr 2026	14	13
29 Apr 2026	17	16
30 Apr 2026	11	11
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	12	11
21 May 2026	10	10
16 Jun 2026	10	10
17 Jun 2026	16	16
18 Jun 2026	7	7
7 Jul 2026	15	15
8 Jul 2026	15	14
9 Jul 2026	4	4
15 Sept 2026	12	12
16 Sept 2026	16	16
17 Sept 2026	10	10

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	90 % of 4 474 shared	89 %
Select Sandra KALNIETE	Sandra KALNIETE	EPP	Latvia	90 % of 5 208 shared	89 %
Select Stefan KÖHLER	Stefan KÖHLER	EPP	Germany	90 % of 5 166 shared	89 %
Select Alexandra MEHNERT	Alexandra MEHNERT	EPP	Germany	90 % of 4 937 shared	89 %
Select Jan FARSKÝ	Jan FARSKÝ	EPP	Czechia	90 % of 5 505 shared	89 %
Select Lena DÜPONT	Lena DÜPONT	EPP	Germany	90 % of 4 641 shared	89 %
Select Siegfried MUREŞAN	Siegfried MUREŞAN	EPP	Romania	89 % of 5 454 shared	89 %
Select Niels GEUKING	Niels GEUKING	EPP	Germany	89 % of 5 609 shared	89 %
Select Sven SIMON	Sven SIMON	EPP	Germany	89 % of 4 599 shared	89 %
Select Ralf SEEKATZ	Ralf SEEKATZ	EPP	Germany	89 % of 5 020 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	83 % of 5 080 shared	82 %
Select Ivars IJABS	Ivars IJABS	Renew	Latvia	81 % of 4 399 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	81 % of 5 476 shared	82 %
Select Jérémy DECERLE	Jérémy DECERLE	Renew	France	81 % of 2 885 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	81 % of 5 001 shared	82 %
Select Eugen TOMAC	Eugen TOMAC	Renew	Romania	81 % of 4 102 shared	82 %
Select Sophie WILMÈS	Sophie WILMÈS	Renew	Belgium	81 % of 3 857 shared	82 %
Select Anna STÜRGKH	Anna STÜRGKH	Renew	Austria	81 % of 4 193 shared	82 %
Select Bart GROOTHUIS	Bart GROOTHUIS	Renew	Netherlands	81 % of 4 230 shared	82 %
Select Benoit CASSART	Benoit CASSART	Renew	Belgium	81 % of 5 194 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on DevelopmentDEVE Committee	Substitute	3 Nov 2025	now
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home AffairsLIBE Committee	Substitute	18 Mar 2026	now
Subcommittee on Human RightsDROI Subcommittee	Member	16 Sept 2024	now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committee	Substitute	18 Mar 2026	now
Delegation for relations with BelarusD-BY Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Association CommitteeD-MD Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Committee on DevelopmentDEVE Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	8 Oct 2025
Subcommittee on Human RightsDROI Subcommittee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	15 Sept 2024

Show all 10 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Towards an EU strategy to protect and strengthen the international justice system and its institutions, mechanisms and partners	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	9 Apr 2026
Establishing the Union support for asylum, migration and integration for the period from 2028 to 2034	Opinion rapporteur	DEVE	14 Jan 2026
I will be responsible for negotiating the Parliament´s resolution on the Commission report on Bosnia and Herzegovina.	Rapporteur	AFET	14 Nov 2024

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

28 contributions recorded; 4 on behalf of their group; 45 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Jun 2026	An EU future for the Western Balkans (joint debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
16 Jun 2026	An EU future for the Western Balkans (joint debate)	Speech · 4 min	Read
18 Dec 2025	30th anniversary of the signing of the Dayton-Paris Peace Agreement (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	Cases of pro-Russian espionage in the European Parliament (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
16 Dec 2025	Continuous Belarusian hybrid attacks against Lithuania (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
26 Nov 2025	EU response to the continuous airspace violations and sabotage of critical infrastructure in the EU originating from Russia and Belarus (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
22 Oct 2025	Situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections (debate)	Speech	Read
22 Oct 2025	Situation in Belarus, five years after the fraudulent presidential elections (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 28 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 37

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The deteriorating situation of media freedom and freedom of expression in Hong-Kong, amid the recent arrest of bookseller Leticia Wong and the convictions of Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung B-10-2026-0405	Motion for a resolutionwith 23 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0418	Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0394	Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre B-10-2026-0355	Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0362	Motion for a resolutionwith 25 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the abduction, forced conversion and child marriage of Maria Shahbaz and the protection of girls in Pakistan B-10-2026-0350	Motion for a resolutionwith 27 co-authors	—
16 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso B-10-2026-0321	Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors	—
16 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0328	Motion for a resolutionwith 28 co-authors	—
15 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Nicaragua – the cases of Carlos Brenes, Salvadora del Socorro Martínez Aburto and Brooklyn Rivera B-10-2026-0292	Motion for a resolutionwith 26 co-authors	—
27 Apr 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ensuring accountability and justice in response to Russia’s continued attacks against the civilian population in Ukraine B-10-2026-0215	Motion for a resolutionwith 30 co-authors	—

Show all 37 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 19

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
10 Jul 2026	Towards an EU strategy to protect and strengthen the international justice system and its institutions, mechanisms and partners AFET-AM-790940	AFET	42
26 May 2026	Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789071	CJ19	5
26 May 2026	Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789070	CJ19	3
26 May 2026	Establishing Global Europe CJ19-AM-789069	CJ19	4
24 Apr 2026	2025 Commission report on Bosnia and Herzegovina AFET-AM-787778	AFET	27
22 Apr 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine AFET-AM-786697	AFET	19
28 Nov 2025	Global Gateway -– past impacts and future orientation CJ19-AM-779672	CJ19	20
28 Nov 2025	Global Gateway -– past impacts and future orientation CJ19-AM-781169	CJ19	19
24 Nov 2025	Recommendation for the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on EU-China political relations AFET-AM-779786	AFET	4
24 Nov 2025	Recommendation for the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on EU-China political relations AFET-AM-779788	AFET	7

Show all 19 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Czechia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256846?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Ondřej KOLÁŘ”. Member record. memberId 256846. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256846?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256846. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256846?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-256846,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Ondřej KOLÁŘ}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256846?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256846?period=2026&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256846. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256846. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 37

Amendments tabled in committee, 19

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928