Member

Petras GRAŽULIS

ESN · Lithuania

Group: ESN
Country: Lithuania
Roll-call participation: 80.6 %ⓘ of 2 521 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.9 % · 2026, roll calls
With majority line: 74.9 %ⓘ of 2 029 votes where the group had a line · ESN median 93.5 %

More facts (5)

National party: TTS Tautos ir teisingumo sąjunga
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 410 of 1 900 votesⓘ
Committees: ITRE (substitute), PETI
Member id: 256808

National party: TTS Tautos ir teisingumo sąjunga
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 410 of 1 900 votesⓘ
Committees: ITRE (substitute), PETI
Member id: 256808

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Roll-call participation ⓘ

80.6 %

2 033 of 2 521 roll calls while in office

ESN median: 95.5 % (−14.9 pts)

Chamber median: 90.9 %

With majority line ⓘ

74.9 %

1 520 of 2 029 votes where their group had a line

ESN median: 93.5 % (−18.6 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

21.6 %

410 of 1 900 votes where their group had a clear line

132 opposite (for ↔ against), 253 abstained against the line, 25 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

18.8 %

382 of 2 033 votes cast

Participation 80.6 % — ESN median 95.5 %, 27 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Petras GRAŽULIS	80.6 %
ESN median	95.5 %
Lowest in the group	70.8 %
Highest in the group	99.4 %
Members	27

With majority line 74.9 % — ESN median 93.5 %, 27 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 27 members of the ESN with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Petras GRAŽULIS	74.9 %
ESN median	93.5 %
Lowest in the group	72.8 %
Highest in the group	99.6 %
Members	27

2026, 2 521 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of ESN; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
21 Jan 2026	EU-Bosnia and Herzegovina Agreement on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in Bosnia and Herzegovina Final vote on the draft Council decision	Consent given 565 for, 83 against, 14 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
21 Jan 2026	Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA) Final vote on motion B10-0061/2026	225 for, 402 against, 13 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
21 Jan 2026	Air passenger rights Amendments 1 + 243 (voted as one)	632 for, 15 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
21 Jan 2026	Request for opinion from the Court of Justice on the compatibility with the Treaties of the proposed EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EMPA) and Interim Trade Agreement (ITA) Final vote on motion B10-0060/2026	Adopted 334 for, 324 against, 11 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 2, adding text after recital G	499 for, 112 against, 41 abstained	Position: For ≠ group	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 4, adding text after recital Ea	212 for, 421 against, 15 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 1, adding text after recital Ea	589 for, 51 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 12 to paragraph 22	349 for, 287 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 14	543 for, 59 against, 41 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 10a	205 for, 439 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 9a	194 for, 441 against, 14 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 9a	207 for, 431 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 8 to paragraph 7a	347 for, 277 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 5	350 for, 277 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 4	169 for, 440 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Murder of Mehdi Kessaci – urgent need for ambitious European action against drug trafficking Amendment 5 to paragraph 3	202 for, 442 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 417 for, 234 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Separate vote on recital M	645 for, 8 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Amendment 1 to recital H	189 for, 461 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Separate vote on recital G	420 for, 198 against, 43 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Recital F — part 2	428 for, 204 against, 19 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Separate vote on recital C	645 for, 14 against, 0 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Recital B — part 2	427 for, 212 against, 24 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 12	198 for, 441 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5	195 for, 439 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Paragraph 3 — part 3	379 for, 216 against, 53 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 3	202 for, 445 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Paragraph 2 — part 2	419 for, 193 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Reform of the European Electoral Act – hurdles to ratification and implementation in the Member States Paragraph 2 — part 1	645 for, 12 against, 0 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 444 for, 153 against, 55 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crises Paragraph 10 — part 2	325 for, 290 against, 31 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Safeguarding and promoting financial stability amid economic uncertainties Final vote on the motion for a resolution	Adopted 491 for, 83 against, 84 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 420 for, 207 against, 20 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies Amendment 10, adding text after recital F	207 for, 425 against, 14 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies Amendment 3 to recital F	187 for, 436 against, 24 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies Amendment 2 to recital E	178 for, 454 against, 20 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Abstained
20 Jan 2026	Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies Amendment 1 to recital A	288 for, 294 against, 63 abstained	Position: Abstained	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 10	175 for, 455 against, 23 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 492 for, 144 against, 28 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 32, adding text after recital E	190 for, 450 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 31, adding text after recital C	193 for, 464 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Separate vote on citation 2	491 for, 139 against, 20 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 30 to citation 2	199 for, 445 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 27 to paragraph 41	162 for, 484 against, 18 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 35 to paragraph 40	124 for, 500 against, 28 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 26 to paragraph 40	136 for, 487 against, 24 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendments 25 + 34 (voted as one) to paragraph 37	191 for, 423 against, 48 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 29	79 for, 561 against, 15 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 14	81 for, 518 against, 56 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
20 Jan 2026	The 28th Regime: a new legal framework for innovative companies Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 14	78 for, 528 against, 58 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 10 of 34 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2026	67	66
21 Jan 2026	112	86
22 Jan 2026	58	55
9 Feb 2026	2	0
10 Feb 2026	38	35
11 Feb 2026	13	13
12 Feb 2026	141	0
24 Feb 2026	43	41
9 Mar 2026	1	0
10 Mar 2026	197	186
11 Mar 2026	60	58
12 Mar 2026	34	32
25 Mar 2026	3	3
26 Mar 2026	69	67
27 Apr 2026	2	0
28 Apr 2026	225	175
29 Apr 2026	296	289
30 Apr 2026	68	64
18 May 2026	4	0
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	93
21 May 2026	98	0
15 Jun 2026	2	0
16 Jun 2026	40	31
17 Jun 2026	127	124
18 Jun 2026	77	0
6 Jul 2026	2	0
7 Jul 2026	72	69
8 Jul 2026	144	133
9 Jul 2026	67	61
14 Sept 2026	1	0
15 Sept 2026	155	147
16 Sept 2026	80	79
17 Sept 2026	124	123

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within ESN

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Roberto VANNACCI	Roberto VANNACCI changed group	ESN	Italy	75 % of 1 771 shared	80 %
Select Marc JONGEN	Marc JONGEN	ESN	Germany	74 % of 4 318 shared	80 %
Select René AUST	René AUST	ESN	Germany	72 % of 4 495 shared	80 %
Select Volker SCHNURRBUSCH	Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group	ESN	Germany	72 % of 3 499 shared	80 %
Select Anja ARNDT	Anja ARNDT	ESN	Germany	71 % of 4 270 shared	80 %
Select Irmhild BOSSDORF	Irmhild BOSSDORF	ESN	Germany	71 % of 4 685 shared	80 %
Select Stanislav STOYANOV	Stanislav STOYANOV	ESN	Bulgaria	71 % of 4 553 shared	80 %
Select Christine ANDERSON	Christine ANDERSON	ESN	Germany	71 % of 4 589 shared	80 %
Select Petar VOLGIN	Petar VOLGIN	ESN	Bulgaria	70 % of 4 471 shared	80 %
Select Rada LAYKOVA	Rada LAYKOVA	ESN	Bulgaria	70 % of 4 167 shared	80 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Volker SCHNURRBUSCH	Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group	ESN	Germany	92 % of 203 shared	49 %
Select Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK	Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group	Patriots	Poland	70 % of 1 096 shared	70 %
Select Marion MARÉCHAL	Marion MARÉCHAL	ECR	France	66 % of 4 197 shared	64 %
Select Guillaume PELTIER	Guillaume PELTIER	ECR	France	66 % of 4 319 shared	64 %
Select Csaba DÖMÖTÖR	Csaba DÖMÖTÖR	Patriots	Hungary	66 % of 4 437 shared	70 %
Select György HÖLVÉNYI	György HÖLVÉNYI	Patriots	Hungary	65 % of 3 117 shared	70 %
Select András LÁSZLÓ	András LÁSZLÓ	Patriots	Hungary	65 % of 4 121 shared	70 %
Select Antonín STANĚK	Antonín STANĚK	Patriots	Czechia	65 % of 2 877 shared	70 %
Select Viktória FERENC	Viktória FERENC	Patriots	Hungary	65 % of 4 163 shared	70 %
Select Anna BRYŁKA	Anna BRYŁKA changed group	Patriots	Poland	65 % of 4 436 shared	69 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on PetitionsPETI Committee	Member	22 Jan 2025	now
Delegation to the EU-Albania Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary CommitteeD-AL Joint parliamentary committee	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with Central AsiaDCAS Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	21 Jan 2025
Committee on PetitionsPETI Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	21 Jan 2025

Show all 6 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Vice-President		6 Feb 2025

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

131 contributions recorded; 7 on behalf of their group; 128 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Sept 2026	Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Sept 2026	The impact of the implementation of the Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) on SMEs, its administrative burden and challenges for the European Single Market (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Sept 2026	State of the Union (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Presentation of the Fair Labour Mobility Package (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Presentation of the Fair Labour Mobility Package (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Jul 2026	Feasibility of a 28th tax regime and its potential to support EU competitiveness (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Jul 2026	Evaluation of the common fisheries policy and follow-up (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
9 Jul 2026	Evaluation of the common fisheries policy and follow-up (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
8 Jul 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 15

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
31 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need to combat migrant grooming gangs B-10-2026-0373	Motion for a resolutionwith 80 co-authors	—
17 Jul 2026	Adapting EU energy performance policies in the light of extreme heat episodes O-10-2026-000032	Oral questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
3 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the quality and timeliness of the European Commission’s replies to Members’ written questions B-10-2026-0271	Motion for a resolutionwith 33 co-authors	—
8 Apr 2026	Union Resettlement and Humanitarian Admission Framework Regulation E-10-2026-001410	Written questionwith 25 co-authors	18 Jun 2026
5 Mar 2026	Anti-fascist movements and political violence – the real threat to democracy E-10-2026-000925	Written questionwith 62 co-authors	29 Apr 2026
26 Feb 2026	Inclusion of the Muslim Brotherhood on the EU list of terrorist organisations O-10-2026-000009	Oral questionwith 36 co-authors	Not yet answered
19 Jan 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania B-10-2026-0076	Motion for a resolutionwith 1 co-author	—
8 Dec 2025	Ban on the sale of nitrous oxide to the general public O-10-2025-000046	Oral questionwith 42 co-authors	Not yet answered
2 Dec 2025	Inquiry on politicians on university boards E-10-2025-004762	Written questionwith 20 co-authors	23 Mar 2026
26 Nov 2025	Assessment of Antifa Ost (‘Hammerbande’) as a structured terrorist organisation E-10-2025-004707	Written questionwith 20 co-authors	Not yet answered

Show all 15 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

No committee amendment by this member found this term.

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Europe of Sovereign Nations ESN · Far-right · ultranationalism

National delegation

Delegation Lithuania National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256808?page=50&period=2026&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 2 October 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Petras GRAŽULIS”. Member record. memberId 256808. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256808?page=50&period=2026&vscope=all (retrieved 2 October 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256808. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/256808?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-256808,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Petras GRAŽULIS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256808?page=50&period=2026&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/256808?page=50&period=2026&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-10-02},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 256808. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/256808. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 343d33dd3e67 (2 Oct 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within ESN

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 15

Amendments tabled in committee, 0

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928