Member

Marina MESURE

The Left · France

Group: The Left
Country: France
Roll-call participation: 97.5 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line: 94.3 %ⓘ of 2 814 votes where the group had a line · The Left median 93.4 %

More facts (5)

National party: LFI La France Insoumise
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 51 of 2 612 votesⓘ
Committees: INTA (substitute), ITRE, SEDE (substitute)
Member id: 236053

National party: LFI La France Insoumise
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 51 of 2 612 votesⓘ
Committees: INTA (substitute), ITRE, SEDE (substitute)
Member id: 236053

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

97.5 %

2 818 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

The Left median: 90.3 % (+7.2 pts)

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

94.3 %

2 654 of 2 814 votes where their group had a line

The Left median: 93.4 % (+1.0 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.0 %

51 of 2 612 votes where their group had a clear line

20 opposite (for ↔ against), 26 abstained against the line, 5 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

4.6 %

129 of 2 818 votes cast

Participation 97.5 % — The Left median 90.3 %, 47 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 47 members of the The Left with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Marina MESURE	97.5 %
The Left median	90.3 %
Lowest in the group	13.4 %
Highest in the group	99.2 %
Members	47

With majority line 94.3 % — The Left median 93.4 %, 47 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 47 members of the The Left with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Marina MESURE	94.3 %
The Left median	93.4 %
Lowest in the group	70.1 %
Highest in the group	97.3 %
Members	47

2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of The Left; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 0 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	44
10 Feb 2025	1	1
11 Feb 2025	32	32
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	30
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	219
13 Mar 2025	24	24
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	246
3 Apr 2025	62	60
5 May 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	10	10
7 May 2025	220	214
8 May 2025	103	97
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	49
16 Jun 2025	2	2
17 Jun 2025	41	40
18 Jun 2025	91	88
19 Jun 2025	87	85
7 Jul 2025	1	1
8 Jul 2025	55	54
9 Jul 2025	134	132
10 Jul 2025	36	32
8 Sept 2025	1	1
9 Sept 2025	101	100
10 Sept 2025	34	33
11 Sept 2025	69	69
6 Oct 2025	2	2
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	53
9 Oct 2025	65	60
20 Oct 2025	3	2
21 Oct 2025	13	13
22 Oct 2025	186	179
23 Oct 2025	55	53
13 Nov 2025	267	264
24 Nov 2025	3	3
25 Nov 2025	75	75
26 Nov 2025	100	97
27 Nov 2025	125	124
15 Dec 2025	4	3
16 Dec 2025	66	66
17 Dec 2025	43	43
18 Dec 2025	42	42

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within The Left

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Emma FOURREAU	Emma FOURREAU	The Left	France	100 % of 5 248 shared	87 %
Select Anthony SMITH	Anthony SMITH	The Left	France	100 % of 5 309 shared	87 %
Select Arash SAEIDI	Arash SAEIDI	The Left	France	100 % of 4 423 shared	87 %
Select Leila CHAIBI	Leila CHAIBI	The Left	France	100 % of 5 588 shared	87 %
Select Damien CARÊME	Damien CARÊME	The Left	France	100 % of 4 914 shared	87 %
Select Rima HASSAN	Rima HASSAN	The Left	France	100 % of 4 416 shared	87 %
Select Manon AUBRY	Manon AUBRY	The Left	France	99 % of 5 578 shared	87 %
Select Younous OMARJEE	Younous OMARJEE	The Left	France	95 % of 4 209 shared	87 %
Select Mimmo LUCANO	Mimmo LUCANO	The Left	Italy	93 % of 2 568 shared	87 %
Select Martin GÜNTHER	Martin GÜNTHER	The Left	Germany	93 % of 2 869 shared	87 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Ana MIRANDA PAZ	Greens	Spain	87 % of 4 700 shared	77 %
Select Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Vicent MARZÀ IBÁÑEZ	Greens	Spain	86 % of 5 243 shared	77 %
Select Benedetta SCUDERI	Benedetta SCUDERI	Greens	Italy	85 % of 5 491 shared	77 %
Select David CORMAND	David CORMAND	Greens	France	85 % of 5 595 shared	77 %
Select Cristina GUARDA	Cristina GUARDA	Greens	Italy	85 % of 4 804 shared	77 %
Select Mélissa CAMARA	Mélissa CAMARA	Greens	France	84 % of 4 970 shared	77 %
Select Saskia BRICMONT	Saskia BRICMONT	Greens	Belgium	84 % of 5 350 shared	77 %
Select Leoluca ORLANDO	Leoluca ORLANDO	Greens	Italy	84 % of 4 956 shared	77 %
Select Marie TOUSSAINT	Marie TOUSSAINT	Greens	France	84 % of 5 379 shared	77 %
Select Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ	Jaume ASENS LLODRÀ	Greens	Spain	84 % of 4 615 shared	77 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on International TradeINTA Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE Committee	Substitute	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-Armenia Parliamentary Partnership Committee, the EU-Azerbaijan Parliamentary Cooperation Committee and the EU-Georgia Parliamentary Association CommitteeDSCA Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Fighting against PovertyIG10-12 Intergroup / working group	Member	24 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Trade UnionsIG10-24 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now
Subcommittee on Security and DefenceSEDE Subcommittee	Substitute	9 Dec 2024	19 Jan 2025
Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary AssemblyDEPA Parliamentary assembly	Member	19 Sept 2024	6 Oct 2024

Show all 9 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
European Union Space Services Agency and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/696	Shadow rapporteur	ITRE	21 Sept 2026
Establishing a framework of measures for the acceleration of industrial capacity and decarbonisation in strategic sectors and amending Regulations (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2024/1735 and (EU) 2024/3110	Shadow rapporteur	ITRE	2 Jun 2026
Establishing a framework of measures for the acceleration of industrial capacity and decarbonisation in strategic sectors and amending Regulations (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2024/1735 and (EU) 2024/3110	Shadow rapporteur	ITRE	20 May 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	INTA	19 May 2026
No dossier named	Opinion rapporteur	INTA	11 May 2026
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	INTA	23 Apr 2026
Addressing the negative trade-related effects of global overcapacity on the Union steel market	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	ITRE	18 Nov 2025
Global Gateway -– past impacts and future orientation	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	INTA	2 Oct 2025
Safety, resilience and sustainability of space activities in the Union	Shadow rapporteur	ITRE	23 Sept 2025
Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU‘s need to adapt to be fit for today‘s security challenges	Shadow rapporteur	SEDE	28 Aug 2025

Show all 16 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

29 contributions recorded; 5 on behalf of their group; 38 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	Urgent need for EU support to Ukraine against Russia’s escalation of its war of aggression (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Urgent measures to strengthen the competitiveness and safeguard quality jobs in the EU’s automotive sector (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Electrification Action Plan (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
18 May 2026	One-minute speeches on matters of political importance	Speech · 1 min	Read
18 May 2026	Negative trade-related effects of global overcapacity on the Union steel market (debate) on behalf of The Left	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Mar 2026	Building Europe's clean, independent and secure energy following the 2026 North Sea Summit (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	Defence (joint debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
22 Jan 2026	Drones and new systems of warfare – the EU’s need to adapt to be fit for today’s security challenges (debate) on behalf of The Left	Speech · 2 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	Arbitrary arrest and sentencing of academics Bahruz Samadov and Igbal Abilov in Azerbaijan on behalf of The Left	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Dec 2025	Grids package and tackling raising energy prices through robust infrastructure (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read

Show all 29 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 60

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
7 Sept 2026	Climate change, public health and the world of work: for a directive on maximum working temperatures O-10-2026-000035	Oral questionwith 35 co-authors	Not yet answered
10 Aug 2026	Contradiction of strengthening the trade partnership with Baku while Armenian hostages and prisoners continue to be detained in Azerbaijan E-10-2026-003248	Written question	17 Sept 2026
24 Jul 2026	Azerbaijan’s erasure of Armenian cultural heritage from Nagorno-Karabakh E-10-2026-003121	Written question	21 Aug 2026
23 Jul 2026	EU external relations and asserting the right of return of Armenians displaced from Nagorno-Karabakh E-10-2026-003106	Written question	2 Sept 2026
22 Jul 2026	Crisis in the French lavender industry E-10-2026-003077	Written question	18 Sept 2026
22 Jul 2026	Protecting workers against extreme heatwaves in the European Union E-10-2026-003076	Written question	21 Aug 2026
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
25 Jun 2026	The recent coercive measures imposed by the United States against Cuba, their extraterritorial nature and the measures to be adopted to defend the interests of individuals and companies from EU countries O-10-2026-000029	Oral questionwith 27 co-authors	Not yet answered
24 Jun 2026	ECB’s decision to raise interest rates and its impact on the rising cost of living O-10-2026-000028	Oral questionwith 39 co-authors	Not yet answered
17 Jun 2026	Albania: defending ecosystems against Trump family mega-projects E-10-2026-002497	Written questionwith 10 co-authors	13 Aug 2026

Show all 60 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 46

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790936	CJ53	6
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790938	CJ53	5
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790937	CJ53	12
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790005	CJ53	19
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790932	CJ53	11
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790933	CJ53	2
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790934	CJ53	17
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790935	CJ53	17
2 Jul 2026	From prototypes to capabilities – enabling new defence actors to scale up SEDE-AM-789957	SEDE	4
13 May 2026	Establishing the Programme for agile and rapid defence innovation (AGILE) CJ55-AM-788873	CJ55	17

Show all 46 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political groups this term

Group The Left in the European Parliament (GUE/NGL) The Left · Left · democratic socialism, communism

National delegation

Delegation France National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/236053?period=2025&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Marina MESURE”. Member record. memberId 236053. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/236053?period=2025&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/236053. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/236053?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-236053,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Marina MESURE}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/236053?period=2025&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/236053?period=2025&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 236053. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/236053. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within The Left

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 60

Amendments tabled in committee, 46

Connections

Political groups this term

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928