Member

Ernő SCHALLER-BAROSS

Patriots · Hungary

Group: Patriots PfE
Country: Hungary
Roll-call participation: 78.3 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line: 80.8 %ⓘ of 2 259 votes where the group had a line · Patriots median 83.1 %

More facts (5)

National party: Fidesz-KDNP Fidesz-Magyar Polgári Szövetség-Kereszténydemokrata Néppárt
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 193 of 1 818 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO, IMCO, JURI (substitute)
Member id: 213330

National party: Fidesz-KDNP Fidesz-Magyar Polgári Szövetség-Kereszténydemokrata Néppárt
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 193 of 1 818 votesⓘ
Committees: AFCO, IMCO, JURI (substitute)
Member id: 213330

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

78.3 %

2 265 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

Patriots median: 93.3 % (−15.0 pts)

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

80.8 %

1 825 of 2 259 votes where their group had a line

Patriots median: 83.1 % (−2.3 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

10.6 %

193 of 1 818 votes where their group had a clear line

47 opposite (for ↔ against), 128 abstained against the line, 18 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

13.2 %

299 of 2 265 votes cast

Participation 78.3 % — Patriots median 93.3 %, 88 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 88 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Ernő SCHALLER-BAROSS	78.3 %
Patriots median	93.3 %
Lowest in the group	51.8 %
Highest in the group	99.9 %
Members	88

With majority line 80.8 % — Patriots median 83.1 %, 88 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 88 members of the Patriots with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Ernő SCHALLER-BAROSS	80.8 %
Patriots median	83.1 %
Lowest in the group	72.7 %
Highest in the group	93.8 %
Members	88

2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Patriots; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 5	343 for, 247 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 5	338 for, 261 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5	201 for, 390 against, 14 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5	280 for, 292 against, 26 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 64 to paragraph 5	200 for, 397 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 4	437 for, 82 against, 82 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 4	231 for, 350 against, 18 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4	272 for, 256 against, 77 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 4	124 for, 428 against, 50 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 23 to paragraph 4	427 for, 156 against, 24 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 63 to paragraph 4	267 for, 332 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 3	194 for, 399 against, 11 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3	136 for, 423 against, 46 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 62 to paragraph 3	92 for, 488 against, 12 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 2	203 for, 390 against, 11 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 2 — part 2	524 for, 75 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 2 — part 1	596 for, 8 against, 2 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1	427 for, 149 against, 29 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 1	111 for, 439 against, 51 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 1 — part 2	435 for, 127 against, 47 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 601 for, 4 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 5, adding text after recital H	200 for, 406 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 13 to recital C — part 2	344 for, 201 against, 63 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 13 to recital C — part 1	378 for, 202 against, 30 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 4, adding text after recital B	195 for, 403 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 22	186 for, 408 against, 18 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 5	207 for, 397 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Paragraph 5 — part 2	512 for, 86 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Paragraph 5 — part 1	602 for, 8 against, 3 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 2	210 for, 396 against, 1 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 2 — part 1	210 for, 395 against, 1 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 2	347 for, 202 against, 62 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 1	381 for, 202 against, 27 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 1	181 for, 424 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1	196 for, 411 against, 3 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 2	344 for, 256 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 1	213 for, 394 against, 1 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 368 for, 172 against, 69 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Amendment 1, adding text after recital G	141 for, 462 against, 11 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 22	452 for, 119 against, 39 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 20	480 for, 116 against, 19 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 3	582 for, 10 against, 13 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 2	275 for, 270 against, 64 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Abstained
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 13 — part 1	490 for, 120 against, 3 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Separate vote on paragraph 12	475 for, 121 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 4	478 for, 126 against, 10 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 3	489 for, 116 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 5 — part 2	479 for, 124 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 4 — part 3	474 for, 126 against, 12 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up Paragraph 4 — part 2	499 for, 95 against, 19 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 14 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	0
10 Feb 2025	1	0
11 Feb 2025	32	0
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	21
10 Mar 2025	2	0
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	223
13 Mar 2025	24	0
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	246
3 Apr 2025	62	53
5 May 2025	5	3
6 May 2025	10	10
7 May 2025	220	215
8 May 2025	103	78
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	51
16 Jun 2025	2	2
17 Jun 2025	41	41
18 Jun 2025	91	0
19 Jun 2025	87	0
7 Jul 2025	1	1
8 Jul 2025	55	55
9 Jul 2025	134	126
10 Jul 2025	36	14
8 Sept 2025	1	0
9 Sept 2025	101	101
10 Sept 2025	34	32
11 Sept 2025	69	0
6 Oct 2025	2	2
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	54
9 Oct 2025	65	61
20 Oct 2025	3	0
21 Oct 2025	13	13
22 Oct 2025	186	178
23 Oct 2025	55	0
13 Nov 2025	267	265
24 Nov 2025	3	0
25 Nov 2025	75	74
26 Nov 2025	100	100
27 Nov 2025	125	110
15 Dec 2025	4	0
16 Dec 2025	66	0
17 Dec 2025	43	43
18 Dec 2025	42	24

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Patriots

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Viktória FERENC	Viktória FERENC	Patriots	Hungary	99 % of 3 736 shared	74 %
Select Annamária VICSEK	Annamária VICSEK	Patriots	Hungary	99 % of 3 386 shared	74 %
Select Csaba DÖMÖTÖR	Csaba DÖMÖTÖR	Patriots	Hungary	99 % of 3 744 shared	74 %
Select Tamás DEUTSCH	Tamás DEUTSCH	Patriots	Hungary	99 % of 2 675 shared	74 %
Select András LÁSZLÓ	András LÁSZLÓ	Patriots	Hungary	99 % of 3 528 shared	74 %
Select András GYÜRK	András GYÜRK	Patriots	Hungary	99 % of 3 018 shared	74 %
Select Pál SZEKERES	Pál SZEKERES Former member	Patriots	Hungary	99 % of 2 911 shared	74 %
Select Enikő GYŐRI	Enikő GYŐRI	Patriots	Hungary	99 % of 3 607 shared	74 %
Select Kinga GÁL	Kinga GÁL	Patriots	Hungary	99 % of 3 119 shared	74 %
Select György HÖLVÉNYI	György HÖLVÉNYI	Patriots	Hungary	98 % of 2 348 shared	74 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Guillaume PELTIER	Guillaume PELTIER	ECR	France	74 % of 3 322 shared	68 %
Select Laurence TROCHU	Laurence TROCHU	ECR	France	73 % of 3 693 shared	68 %
Select Marion MARÉCHAL	Marion MARÉCHAL	ECR	France	73 % of 3 430 shared	68 %
Select Marc JONGEN	Marc JONGEN	ESN	Germany	73 % of 3 414 shared	70 %
Select Stephen Nikola BARTULICA	Stephen Nikola BARTULICA	ECR	Croatia	72 % of 3 228 shared	68 %
Select Nicolas BAY	Nicolas BAY	ECR	France	72 % of 3 416 shared	68 %
Select Anja ARNDT	Anja ARNDT	ESN	Germany	72 % of 3 176 shared	70 %
Select Volker SCHNURRBUSCH	Volker SCHNURRBUSCH changed group	ESN	Germany	71 % of 2 871 shared	68 %
Select Mary KHAN	Mary KHAN	ESN	Germany	71 % of 3 608 shared	70 %
Select René AUST	René AUST	ESN	Germany	71 % of 3 530 shared	70 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Constitutional AffairsAFCO Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Legal AffairsJURI Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committee	Substitute	31 Mar 2025	now
Delegation to the EU-UK Parliamentary Partnership AssemblyD-UK Joint parliamentary committee	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the United StatesD-US Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committee	Member	23 Jan 2025	30 Mar 2025

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
No dossier named	Official delegation	IMCO	13 Jul 2026
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	IMCO	23 Jun 2026
Institutional aspects of artificial intelligence in the context of European integration	Shadow rapporteur	AFCO	10 Feb 2026
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	IMCO	11 Nov 2025
Conclusion of a broad package of agreements to consolidate, deepen and expand the bilateral relations with the Swiss Confederation	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	IMCO	6 Nov 2025
No dossier named	Official delegation	AFCO	10 Jun 2025
Amending Regulations (EU) No 1024/2012 and (EU) 2018/1724 as regards the use of the Internal Market Information System and the Single Digital Gateway for the purposes of certain requirements laid down by Directive (EU) .../... of the European Parliament and of the Council on European cross-border associations (COM(2023)516))	Shadow rapporteur	IMCO	1 Apr 2025
Amending Regulations (EU) No 1024/2012 and (EU) 2018/1724 as regards certain requirements laid down by Directive (EU) XXXX/XXXX	Shadow rapporteur	IMCO	1 Apr 2025
Establishing harmonised requirements in the internal market on transparency of interest representation carried out on behalf of third countries and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	AFCO	12 Mar 2025
Pfe shadow rapporteur to the legislative proposal on ‘Safety of toys and repealing Directive 2009/48/EC - 2023/0290(COD)’	Shadow rapporteur	IMCO	2 Oct 2024

Show all 10 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

39 contributions recorded, 2 written statements; 3 on behalf of their group; 44 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
18 Jun 2026	Circularity requirements for vehicle design and management of end-of-life vehicles (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Jun 2026	Achieving digital sovereignty and resilience for Europe, in light of recent developments affecting access to advanced AI technologies (debate) on behalf of Patriots	Speech · 2 min	Read
20 May 2026	High time to deliver on the Single Market, providing certainty and predictability for EU businesses and quality jobs (continuation of debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 May 2026	High time to deliver on the Single Market, providing certainty and predictability for EU businesses and quality jobs (continuation of debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 May 2026	High time to deliver on the Single Market, providing certainty and predictability for EU businesses and quality jobs (continuation of debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
19 May 2026	EU governance under pressure – institutional responses to global challenges (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate)	Statement	Read
11 Mar 2026	Rise of political violence, notably by far-left organisations (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	Single Market: how to move from an incomplete single market to one market for one Europe (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
11 Feb 2026	Topical debate requested by a political group (S&D) (Rule 169) - State violence in Minneapolis and the rule of law in the United States (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 39 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 37

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
28 Jul 2026	Compatibility of the suspension of Hungarian public service media news services with EU law E-10-2026-003148	Written questionwith 9 co-authors	21 Sept 2026
16 Jul 2026	Constitutional coup by Péter Magyar’s government E-10-2026-003035	Written questionwith 42 co-authors	11 Sept 2026
29 Jun 2026	Ukraine’s updated Action Plan and the protection of national minorities P-10-2026-002670	Priority written questionwith 10 co-authors	30 Jul 2026
26 Jun 2026	Abolition of the Hungarian Constitutional Court’s power to issue preliminary opinions on EU-related matters E-10-2026-002667	Written questionwith 10 co-authors	18 Sept 2026
16 Jun 2026	Ensuring fair treatment of cultural goods in EU customs reform E-10-2026-002472	Written questionwith 1 co-author	12 Aug 2026
11 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on ending ideological flag displays on the premises of European Union institutions B-10-2026-0284	Motion for a resolutionwith 29 co-authors	—
16 Apr 2026	Antifa=Terrorists: zero tolerance for political violence in Europe E-10-2026-001569	Written questionwith 28 co-authors	15 Jun 2026
8 Apr 2026	De facto mandatory nature of the codes of conduct on disinformation and hate speech E-10-2026-001432	Written questionwith 23 co-authors	15 Jun 2026
25 Mar 2026	Restoring genuine academic freedom in our universities E-10-2026-001262	Written questionwith 27 co-authors	22 May 2026
19 Mar 2026	Use of the ‘borderline content’ handbook promoted at the EU Internet Forum for moderating lawful political speech E-10-2026-001160	Written questionwith 31 co-authors	19 May 2026

Show all 37 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 57

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – ‘EU Inc.’ JURI-AM-791129	JURI	20
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791130	JURI	28
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791131	JURI	27
22 Jul 2026	The 28th regime corporate legal framework – 'EU Inc.' JURI-AM-791128	JURI	20
16 Jul 2026	Digital networks, amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, Directive 2002/58/EC and Decision No 676/2002/EC and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1971, Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Decision No 243/2012/EU (Digital Networks Act) IMCO-AM-791044	IMCO	3
16 Jul 2026	Digital networks, amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, Directive 2002/58/EC and Decision No 676/2002/EC and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1971, Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Decision No 243/2012/EU (Digital Networks Act) IMCO-AM-791041	IMCO	19
16 Jul 2026	Digital networks, amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, Directive 2002/58/EC and Decision No 676/2002/EC and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1971, Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Decision No 243/2012/EU (Digital Networks Act) IMCO-AM-791043	IMCO	7
16 Jul 2026	Digital networks, amending Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, Directive 2002/58/EC and Decision No 676/2002/EC and repealing Regulation (EU) 2018/1971, Directive (EU) 2018/1972 and Decision No 243/2012/EU (Digital Networks Act) IMCO-AM-791040	IMCO	3
8 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2017/745 and (EU) 2017/746 as regards simplifying and reducing the burden of the rules on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices, and amending Regulation (EU) 2022/123 as regards the support of the European Medicines Agency for the expert panels on medical devices and Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 as regards the list of Union harmonisation legislation referred to in its Annex I IMCO-AM-790775	IMCO	2
7 Jul 2026	General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2027 - all sections IMCO-AM-790864	IMCO	4

Show all 57 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Patriots for Europe Patriots · Far-right · national conservatism, right-wing populism

National delegation

Delegation Hungary National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/213330?page=2&period=2025&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Ernő SCHALLER-BAROSS”. Member record. memberId 213330. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/213330?page=2&period=2025&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/213330. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/213330?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-213330,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Ernő SCHALLER-BAROSS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/213330?page=2&period=2025&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/213330?page=2&period=2025&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 213330. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/213330. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Patriots

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 37

Amendments tabled in committee, 57

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928