Member · Former member

Tom BERENDSEN

EPP · Netherlands · left on 22 February 2026

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Netherlands
Roll-call participation: 90.9 %ⓘ of 66 roll calls in office · chamber median 93.9 % · 2024 (from july), final votes
With majority line: 96.7 %ⓘ of 60 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 95.3 %

More facts (4)

National party: CDA Christen Democratisch Appèl
In office: 16 Jul 2024 – 22 Feb 2026 (left on 22 February 2026)
Against clear line: 2 of 49 votesⓘ
Member id: 197778

National party: CDA Christen Democratisch Appèl
In office: 16 Jul 2024 – 22 Feb 2026 (left on 22 February 2026)
Against clear line: 2 of 49 votesⓘ
Member id: 197778

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes66 All roll calls516

Roll-call participation ⓘ

90.9 %

60 of 66 final votes while in office

EPP median: 92.4 % (−1.5 pts)

Chamber median: 93.9 %

With majority line ⓘ

96.7 %

58 of 60 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 95.3 % (+1.3 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2 of 49

votes where their group had a clear line — too few for a rate

1 opposite (for ↔ against), 1 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

1.7 %

1 of 60 votes cast

Participation 90.9 % — EPP median 92.4 %, 184 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 184 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Tom BERENDSEN	90.9 %
EPP median	92.4 %
Lowest in the group	37.9 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	184

With majority line 96.7 % — EPP median 95.3 %, 152 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 152 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Tom BERENDSEN	96.7 %
EPP median	95.3 %
Lowest in the group	69.8 %
Highest in the group	100.0 %
Members	152

2024 (from July), 66 final votes; 66 of 81 decisions had a final vote recorded by name. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 3 838

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 363 for, 71 against, 81 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Recital N — part 2	465 for, 16 against, 26 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Recital N — part 1	514 for, 6 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Amendment 7 to recital J	178 for, 340 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Recital A — part 3	380 for, 128 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Recital A — part 2	461 for, 25 against, 29 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Amendment 24 to paragraph 16	73 for, 325 against, 127 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 15	201 for, 307 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 15	168 for, 333 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Paragraph 15 — part 1	440 for, 73 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 14	92 for, 427 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 14	171 for, 338 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 13	123 for, 272 against, 132 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 12	63 for, 351 against, 111 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 11	214 for, 308 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 10	177 for, 338 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 10	180 for, 332 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 10	185 for, 328 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 8	186 for, 340 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 8	178 for, 341 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 8	178 for, 338 against, 10 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Paragraph 8 — part 2	398 for, 93 against, 41 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Paragraph 8 — part 1	379 for, 139 against, 13 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Amendment 13 to paragraph 8	204 for, 324 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Amendment 12 to paragraph 5	204 for, 325 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Situation in Northeast Syria, the violence against civilians and the need to maintain a sustainable ceasefire Amendment 18 to paragraph 3	106 for, 370 against, 62 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	World Cancer Day Separate vote on recital D	363 for, 150 against, 33 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	World Cancer Day Amendment 1 to recital D	215 for, 282 against, 35 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	World Cancer Day Recital C — part 3	458 for, 47 against, 34 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	World Cancer Day Paragraph 13 — part 4	459 for, 45 against, 40 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	World Cancer Day Paragraph 13 — part 2	444 for, 69 against, 28 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	World Cancer Day Paragraph 3 — part 2	443 for, 62 against, 44 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 340 for, 141 against, 68 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on recital P	267 for, 261 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Recital M — part 4	341 for, 136 against, 58 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Recital M — part 3	332 for, 148 against, 48 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Recital M — part 2	315 for, 173 against, 50 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Recital M — part 1	406 for, 122 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Recital K — part 2	201 for, 310 against, 25 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Recital K — part 1	444 for, 50 against, 60 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Recital G — part 3	252 for, 258 against, 43 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Recital G — part 2	279 for, 238 against, 32 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Recital G — part 1	404 for, 78 against, 69 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 2 to recital F	148 for, 353 against, 41 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Recital E — part 2	435 for, 42 against, 78 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 1 to recital B	191 for, 342 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Separate vote on citation 6	287 for, 226 against, 34 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Amendment 9 to paragraph 1, point ad	160 for, 331 against, 56 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point ab — part 2	404 for, 139 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
12 Feb 2026	Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women Paragraph 1, point ab — part 1	521 for, 20 against, 17 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 1 of 16 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
17 Jul 2024	1	1
18 Sept 2024	2	2
19 Sept 2024	6	6
8 Oct 2024	1	1
9 Oct 2024	2	2
10 Oct 2024	1	1
22 Oct 2024	5	5
23 Oct 2024	2	2
24 Oct 2024	2	2
14 Nov 2024	5	5
26 Nov 2024	8	8
27 Nov 2024	7	7
28 Nov 2024	6	0
17 Dec 2024	6	6
18 Dec 2024	7	7
19 Dec 2024	5	5

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Jeroen LENAERS	Jeroen LENAERS	EPP	Netherlands	100 % of 3 759 shared	89 %
Select Ingeborg TER LAAK	Ingeborg TER LAAK	EPP	Netherlands	100 % of 3 742 shared	89 %
Select Siegfried MUREŞAN	Siegfried MUREŞAN	EPP	Romania	97 % of 3 594 shared	89 %
Select Sven SIMON	Sven SIMON	EPP	Germany	97 % of 3 045 shared	89 %
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	97 % of 2 789 shared	89 %
Select Axel VOSS	Axel VOSS	EPP	Germany	97 % of 2 955 shared	89 %
Select Pekka TOVERI	Pekka TOVERI	EPP	Finland	97 % of 3 321 shared	89 %
Select Christine SCHNEIDER	Christine SCHNEIDER Former member	EPP	Germany	97 % of 2 984 shared	89 %
Select Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ	Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ	EPP	Lithuania	97 % of 3 093 shared	89 %
Select Oliver SCHENK	Oliver SCHENK	EPP	Germany	97 % of 3 686 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	89 % of 3 682 shared	82 %
Select Andreas GLÜCK	Andreas GLÜCK	Renew	Germany	89 % of 2 345 shared	82 %
Select Anouk VAN BRUG	Anouk VAN BRUG	Renew	Netherlands	88 % of 2 316 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	88 % of 3 594 shared	82 %
Select Bart GROOTHUIS	Bart GROOTHUIS	Renew	Netherlands	88 % of 3 098 shared	82 %
Select Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN	Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN	Renew	Germany	88 % of 2 660 shared	82 %
Select Moritz KÖRNER	Moritz KÖRNER	Renew	Germany	88 % of 3 672 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	88 % of 3 247 shared	82 %
Select Malik AZMANI	Malik AZMANI	Renew	Netherlands	88 % of 3 737 shared	82 %
Select Svenja HAHN	Svenja HAHN	Renew	Germany	88 % of 3 368 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Dossiers

No rapporteur, shadow or negotiator role recorded this term.

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

24 contributions recorded; 35 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
17 Dec 2025	Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Dec 2025	Preparation of the European Council meeting of 18-19 December 2025, in particular the need to support Ukraine, transatlantic relations and the EU’s strategic autonomy (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
16 Dec 2025	Grids package and tackling raising energy prices through robust infrastructure (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
25 Nov 2025	Effective use of the EU trade and industrial policy to tackle China’s export restrictions (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 Oct 2025	Commission Work Programme 2026 (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
21 Oct 2025	Commission Work Programme 2026 (debate)	Speech	Read
21 Oct 2025	Commission Work Programme 2026 (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
8 Oct 2025	United response to recent Russian violations of the EU Member States’ airspace and critical infrastructure (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
7 Oct 2025	Inland waterway transport: River Information Services (RIS) (A10-0033/2025 - Tom Berendsen) (vote)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Sept 2025	State of the Union (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 24 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 14

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
18 Dec 2025	European commitment to small modular (maritime) nuclear reactors E-10-2025-005005	Written question	9 Mar 2026
18 Dec 2025	Stop the Russian nickel trade via Rotterdam E-10-2025-005006	Written question	12 Feb 2026
17 Dec 2025	Acquisitions of Notified Bodies by companies from third countries E-10-2025-004986	Written question	24 Feb 2026
23 Jul 2025	Exemption for temporary construction emissions and depositions for sustainable projects P-10-2025-003051	Priority written question	3 Sept 2025
2 Jul 2025	Ensuring that demand meets supply in the CO<sub>2</sub> storage market E-10-2025-002712	Written questionwith 1 co-author	12 Sept 2025
10 Jun 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the Clean Industrial Deal B-10-2025-0277	Motion for a resolution	—
5 Jun 2025	Clean Industrial Deal O-10-2025-000020	Oral question	Not yet answered
27 May 2025	Increase in number of attacks with explosives in the Netherlands – Need for European action E-10-2025-002111	Written questionwith 1 co-author	31 Jul 2025
2 May 2025	Apollo Vredestein workers fall victim to inadequate State aid rules P-10-2025-001790	Priority written question	18 Jun 2025
17 Mar 2025	Tackling barriers to collecting road traffic fines and parking charges from foreign motorists E-10-2025-001123	Written question	2 Jun 2025

Show all 14 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 7

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
17 Sept 2025	Military mobility CJ57-AM-777035	CJ57	1
17 Sept 2025	Military mobility CJ57-AM-777036	CJ57	1
4 Jun 2025	Establishing harmonised requirements in the internal market on transparency of interest representation carried out on behalf of third countries and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 AFCO-AM-774387	AFCO	7
22 May 2025	Implementation of the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement ITRE-AM-773329	ITRE	1
28 Mar 2025	European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’) CJ55-AM-771939	CJ55	1
28 Mar 2025	European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’) CJ55-AM-771936	CJ55	1
28 Mar 2025	European Defence Industry Programme and a framework of measures to ensure the timely availability and supply of defence products (‘EDIP’) CJ55-AM-771938	CJ55	2

Show all 7 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Netherlands National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?period=2024&scope=final&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Tom BERENDSEN”. Member record. memberId 197778. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?period=2024&scope=final&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197778. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/197778?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-197778,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Tom BERENDSEN}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?period=2024&scope=final&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/197778?period=2024&scope=final&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 197778. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/197778. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 3 838

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 14

Amendments tabled in committee, 7

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 3 838