Member

Valérie HAYER

Renew · France

Group: Renew
Country: France
Roll-call participation: 95.1 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line: 96.7 %ⓘ of 2 749 votes where the group had a line · Renew median 96.0 %

More facts (5)

National party: Ren Renaissance
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 56 of 2 684 votesⓘ
Committees: BUDG (substitute)
Member id: 135511

National party: Ren Renaissance
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 56 of 2 684 votesⓘ
Committees: BUDG (substitute)
Member id: 135511

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

95.1 %

2 749 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

Renew median: 91.1 % (+4.0 pts)

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

96.7 %

2 659 of 2 749 votes where their group had a line

Renew median: 96.0 % (+0.7 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

2.1 %

56 of 2 684 votes where their group had a clear line

51 opposite (for ↔ against), 5 abstained against the line

Abstention ⓘ

0.6 %

17 of 2 749 votes cast

Participation 95.1 % — Renew median 91.1 %, 76 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 76 members of the Renew with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Valérie HAYER	95.1 %
Renew median	91.1 %
Lowest in the group	50.2 %
Highest in the group	99.7 %
Members	76

With majority line 96.7 % — Renew median 96.0 %, 76 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 76 members of the Renew with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Valérie HAYER	96.7 %
Renew median	96.0 %
Lowest in the group	76.9 %
Highest in the group	98.5 %
Members	76

2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Renew; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: For ≠ group	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 6 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	45
10 Feb 2025	1	1
11 Feb 2025	32	31
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	30
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	228
13 Mar 2025	24	0
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	251
3 Apr 2025	62	62
5 May 2025	5	3
6 May 2025	10	10
7 May 2025	220	218
8 May 2025	103	103
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	53
16 Jun 2025	2	2
17 Jun 2025	41	41
18 Jun 2025	91	91
19 Jun 2025	87	87
7 Jul 2025	1	1
8 Jul 2025	55	55
9 Jul 2025	134	133
10 Jul 2025	36	36
8 Sept 2025	1	0
9 Sept 2025	101	100
10 Sept 2025	34	30
11 Sept 2025	69	69
6 Oct 2025	2	0
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	55
9 Oct 2025	65	65
20 Oct 2025	3	0
21 Oct 2025	13	13
22 Oct 2025	186	184
23 Oct 2025	55	0
13 Nov 2025	267	266
24 Nov 2025	3	3
25 Nov 2025	75	75
26 Nov 2025	100	100
27 Nov 2025	125	124
15 Dec 2025	4	4
16 Dec 2025	66	66
17 Dec 2025	43	43
18 Dec 2025	42	0

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Renew

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE	Marie-Pierre VEDRENNE Former member	Renew	France	98 % of 2 295 shared	92 %
Select Fabienne KELLER	Fabienne KELLER	Renew	France	98 % of 5 536 shared	92 %
Select Bernard GUETTA	Bernard GUETTA	Renew	France	98 % of 5 002 shared	92 %
Select Valérie DEVAUX	Valérie DEVAUX	Renew	France	98 % of 5 175 shared	92 %
Select Sandro GOZI	Sandro GOZI	Renew	France	98 % of 5 235 shared	92 %
Select Pascal CANFIN	Pascal CANFIN	Renew	France	98 % of 5 131 shared	92 %
Select Stéphanie YON-COURTIN	Stéphanie YON-COURTIN	Renew	France	98 % of 4 723 shared	92 %
Select Grégory ALLIONE	Grégory ALLIONE	Renew	France	98 % of 4 813 shared	92 %
Select Christophe GRUDLER	Christophe GRUDLER	Renew	France	97 % of 5 224 shared	92 %
Select Gilles BOYER	Gilles BOYER	Renew	France	97 % of 5 625 shared	92 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Dan NICA	Dan NICA	S&D	Romania	91 % of 3 541 shared	86 %
Select Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ	Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ	S&D	Spain	90 % of 5 354 shared	86 %
Select Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ	Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ	S&D	Lithuania	90 % of 5 312 shared	86 %
Select Birgit SIPPEL	Birgit SIPPEL	S&D	Germany	90 % of 4 565 shared	86 %
Select Sérgio GONÇALVES	Sérgio GONÇALVES	S&D	Portugal	90 % of 5 488 shared	86 %
Select Carla TAVARES	Carla TAVARES	S&D	Portugal	90 % of 5 270 shared	86 %
Select Isilda GOMES	Isilda GOMES	S&D	Portugal	90 % of 4 991 shared	86 %
Select Sven MIKSER	Sven MIKSER	S&D	Estonia	90 % of 5 550 shared	86 %
Select Francisco ASSIS	Francisco ASSIS	S&D	Portugal	90 % of 4 603 shared	86 %
Select Tobias CREMER	Tobias CREMER	S&D	Germany	90 % of 5 300 shared	86 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on BudgetsBUDG Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	22 Oct 2025

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Cooperation among enforcement authorities responsible for the enforcement of Directive (EU) 2019/633 on unfair trading practices in business-to-business relationships in the agricultural and food supply chain	Shadow rapporteur	AGRI	28 Mar 2025
Renew Europe Shadow Rapporteur - Draft Budgetary Assessment on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2020/2220 as regards specific measures under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) to provide additional assistance to Member States affected by natural disasters (COM(2024)0495)	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	BUDG	18 Nov 2024
Renew-BUDG Shadow Rapporteur for the Budgetary Assessment on Council Decision on the conclusion of the Protocol on the implementation of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Republic of Guinea-Bissau (2024–2029)	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	BUDG	2 Oct 2024

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

55 contributions recorded; 51 on behalf of their group; 173 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
16 Sept 2026	State of the Union (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 7 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	Presentation of the programme of activities of the Irish Presidency (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 3 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Protecting children’s safety and mental health from the risks posed by social media – our duty to act now (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 1 min	Read
17 Jun 2026	Preparation of the European Council (joint debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 2 min	Read
20 May 2026	High time to deliver on the Single Market, providing certainty and predictability for EU businesses and quality jobs (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 4 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	Commission interference in democratic process and elections (topical debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 2 min	Read
29 Apr 2026	EU strategy in response to the ongoing Middle East crisis, its implications on energy prices and the availability of fertilizers (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 3 min	Read
25 Mar 2026	Conclusions of the European Council meeting of 19 March 2026 (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 3 min	Read
11 Mar 2026	EUCO and situation in the Middle East (joint debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 4 min	Read
24 Feb 2026	Four years of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine (debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 4 min	Read

Show all 40 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 6

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
7 Jul 2026	Impact of Court ruling on Hungarian anti-LGBTI propaganda law on similar law in Bulgaria E-10-2026-002806	Written questionwith 18 co-authors	15 Sept 2026
1 Jul 2026	PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION requesting the Authority for European Political Parties and European Political Foundations to verify whether Europe of Sovereign Nations Party complies with the conditions laid down in Article 3(1), points (d) and (e), of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2025/2445 B-10-2026-0338	Motion for a resolutionwith 246 co-authors	—
4 Apr 2025	Hungary’s withdrawal from the Rome Statute P-10-2025-001396	Priority written questionwith 1 co-author	13 May 2025
15 Jan 2025	Enforcement of the Digital Services Act (DSA) vis-à-vis large social network platforms in the light of recent allegations of algorithmic bias and foreign interference P-10-2025-000143	Priority written question	5 Mar 2025
26 Sept 2024	The spread of bluetongue virus throughout the EU E-10-2024-001845	Written questionwith 39 co-authors	15 Nov 2024
17 Jul 2024	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the need for the EU’s continuous support for Ukraine B-10-2024-0007	Motion for a resolutionwith 50 co-authors	—

Amendments tabled in committee, 21

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
13 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities BUDG-AM-788876	BUDG	3
13 May 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities BUDG-AM-788868	BUDG	26
23 Jul 2025	Ensuring faster registration and uptake of biological control agents CJ14-AM-775563	CJ14	27
23 Jul 2025	Amending Regulations (EU) No 1308/2013, (EU) 2021/2115 and (EU) No 251/2014 as regards certain market rules and sectoral support measures in the wine sector and for aromatised wine products AGRI-AM-775589	AGRI	15
14 Jul 2025	How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases? AGRI-AM-775679	AGRI	26
14 Jul 2025	How to secure a sustainable future for the EU livestock sector in light of the need to ensure food security, farmers’ resilience and the challenges posed by animal diseases? AGRI-AM-775550	AGRI	23
10 Jul 2025	Amending Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 as regards the conditionality system, types of intervention in the form of direct payment, types of intervention in certain sectors and rural development and annual performance reports and Regulation (EU) 2021/2116 as regards data and interoperability governance, suspensions of payments annual performance clearance and controls and penalties AGRI-AM-775653	AGRI	7
27 May 2025	Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2021/1058 and (EU) 2021/1056 as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review REGI-AM-774292	REGI	1
26 May 2025	Amending Regulations (EU) 2021/1058 and (EU) 2021/1056 as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review REGI-AM-773414	REGI	1
20 May 2025	Cooperation among enforcement authorities responsible for the enforcement of Directive (EU) 2019/633 on unfair trading practices in business-to-business relationships in the agricultural and food supply chain AGRI-AM-773343	AGRI	4

Show all 21 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Renew Europe Renew · Centre · liberalism, pro-Europeanism

National delegation

Delegation France National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/135511?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Valérie HAYER”. Member record. memberId 135511. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/135511?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/135511. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/135511?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-135511,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Valérie HAYER}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/135511?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/135511?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 135511. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/135511. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Renew

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 6

Amendments tabled in committee, 21

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928