Member

Urmas PAET

Renew · Estonia

Group: Renew
Country: Estonia
Roll-call participation: 78.7 %ⓘ of 2 521 roll calls in office · chamber median 90.9 % · 2026, roll calls
With majority line: 95.0 %ⓘ of 1 983 votes where the group had a line · Renew median 95.1 %

More facts (5)

National party: ER Eesti Reformierakond
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 72 of 1 924 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET (vice-chair), SEDE (substitute), TRAN (substitute)
Member id: 129073

National party: ER Eesti Reformierakond
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 72 of 1 924 votesⓘ
Committees: AFET (vice-chair), SEDE (substitute), TRAN (substitute)
Member id: 129073

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes261 All roll calls2 521

Roll-call participation ⓘ

78.7 %

1 984 of 2 521 roll calls while in office

Renew median: 91.7 % (−13.1 pts)

Chamber median: 90.9 %

With majority line ⓘ

95.0 %

1 884 of 1 983 votes where their group had a line

Renew median: 95.1 % (−0.1 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

3.7 %

72 of 1 924 votes where their group had a clear line

39 opposite (for ↔ against), 32 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

2.4 %

48 of 1 984 votes cast

Participation 78.7 % — Renew median 91.7 %, 77 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 77 members of the Renew with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Urmas PAET	78.7 %
Renew median	91.7 %
Lowest in the group	25.2 %
Highest in the group	99.8 %
Members	77

With majority line 95.0 % — Renew median 95.1 %, 77 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 77 members of the Renew with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Urmas PAET	95.0 %
Renew median	95.1 %
Lowest in the group	77.5 %
Highest in the group	98.6 %
Members	77

2026, 2 521 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of Renew; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 13 of 34 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2026	67	64
21 Jan 2026	112	112
22 Jan 2026	58	58
9 Feb 2026	2	0
10 Feb 2026	38	37
11 Feb 2026	13	13
12 Feb 2026	141	135
24 Feb 2026	43	0
9 Mar 2026	1	0
10 Mar 2026	197	197
11 Mar 2026	60	60
12 Mar 2026	34	34
25 Mar 2026	3	2
26 Mar 2026	69	69
27 Apr 2026	2	0
28 Apr 2026	225	220
29 Apr 2026	296	285
30 Apr 2026	68	68
18 May 2026	4	0
19 May 2026	3	3
20 May 2026	96	96
21 May 2026	98	97
15 Jun 2026	2	0
16 Jun 2026	40	0
17 Jun 2026	127	0
18 Jun 2026	77	0
6 Jul 2026	2	0
7 Jul 2026	72	72
8 Jul 2026	144	141
9 Jul 2026	67	66
14 Sept 2026	1	0
15 Sept 2026	155	155
16 Sept 2026	80	0
17 Sept 2026	124	0

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within Renew

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	95 % of 4 742 shared	92 %
Select Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON	Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON	Renew	Finland	95 % of 4 823 shared	92 %
Select Dainius ŽALIMAS	Dainius ŽALIMAS	Renew	Lithuania	95 % of 4 916 shared	92 %
Select Anna STÜRGKH	Anna STÜRGKH	Renew	Austria	95 % of 4 142 shared	92 %
Select Pina PICIERNO	Pina PICIERNO changed group	Renew	Italy	95 % of 210 shared	92 %
Select Elsi KATAINEN	Elsi KATAINEN	Renew	Finland	95 % of 5 201 shared	92 %
Select Marjan ŠAREC	Marjan ŠAREC	Renew	Slovenia	95 % of 4 673 shared	92 %
Select Ilhan KYUCHYUK	Ilhan KYUCHYUK	Renew	Bulgaria	94 % of 5 047 shared	92 %
Select Stine BOSSE	Stine BOSSE	Renew	Denmark	94 % of 5 203 shared	92 %
Select Vlad VASILE-VOICULESCU	Vlad VASILE-VOICULESCU	Renew	Romania	94 % of 4 382 shared	92 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Axel VOSS	Axel VOSS	EPP	Germany	90 % of 4 102 shared	82 %
Select Isabel WISELER-LIMA	Isabel WISELER-LIMA	EPP	Luxembourg	90 % of 5 173 shared	82 %
Select Dennis RADTKE	Dennis RADTKE	EPP	Germany	90 % of 4 302 shared	82 %
Select Martine KEMP	Martine KEMP	EPP	Luxembourg	90 % of 4 312 shared	82 %
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	90 % of 4 221 shared	82 %
Select Liesbet SOMMEN	Liesbet SOMMEN	EPP	Belgium	90 % of 5 148 shared	82 %
Select Daniel CASPARY	Daniel CASPARY Former member	EPP	Germany	90 % of 3 302 shared	82 %
Select Aura SALLA	Aura SALLA	EPP	Finland	90 % of 4 500 shared	82 %
Select Sven SIMON	Sven SIMON	EPP	Germany	90 % of 4 279 shared	82 %
Select Angelika NIEBLER	Angelika NIEBLER	EPP	Germany	90 % of 4 622 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Foreign AffairsAFET Committee	Vice-chair	23 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Security and DefenceSEDE Committee	Substitute	23 Jan 2025	now
Committee on Transport and TourismTRAN Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Subcommittee on Human RightsDROI Subcommittee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary CommitteeD-MX Joint parliamentary committee	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation to the Cariforum-EU Parliamentary CommitteeDCAR Joint parliamentary committee	Substitute	23 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the Federative Republic of BrazilD-BR Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of ChinaD-CN Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean CommunityDAND Delegation	Substitute	23 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now

Show all 13 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2026	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	3 Sept 2026
33rd Meeting of the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee taking place in Mexico City from 22-24 September 2026.	Official delegation	D-MX	26 Aug 2026
Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on EU-Norway political relations	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	13 Jul 2026
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	2 Jun 2026
The 7th EU-Lao PDR Inter-Parliamentary Meeting, Vientiane and Luang Prabang, Lao PDR, 25 - 27 May 2026	Official delegation	DASE	30 Apr 2026
Measures to facilitate consular protection for unrepresented citizens of the Union in third countries	Shadow rapporteur for an opinion	AFET	27 Apr 2026
Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure	Shadow rapporteur	SEDE	23 Apr 2026
D-BR mission to Brazil	Official delegation	D-BR	30 Mar 2026
No dossier named	Shadow rapporteur	AFET	23 Mar 2026
No dossier named	Official delegation	SEDE	19 Mar 2026

Show all 31 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

36 contributions recorded, 21 written statements; 5 on behalf of their group; 24 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
15 Sept 2026	Hybrid attacks against the EU Member States (joint debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 1 min	Read
15 Sept 2026	Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield (debate)	Statement	Read
7 Jul 2026	EU-Mexico (joint debate) on behalf of Renew	Speech · 2 min	Read
7 Jul 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine (debate)	Statement	Read
19 May 2026	Europe's response to reduced US military deployments in Europe, particularly at its Eastern flank in the light of the latest US decisions (debate)	Statement	Read
28 Apr 2026	Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 (debate)	Statement	Read
26 Mar 2026	EU-US trade deal (joint debate)	Statement	Read
11 Mar 2026	Case of Elene Khoshtaria and political prisoners under the Georgian Dream regime	Statement	Read
20 Jan 2026	Territorial integrity and sovereignty of Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark: the need for a united EU response to US blackmail attempts (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 Jan 2026	Territorial integrity and sovereignty of Greenland and the Kingdom of Denmark: the need for a united EU response to US blackmail attempts (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read

Show all 36 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 91

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Post-electoral repression in Zambia and the killing of Mutotwe Kafwaya B-10-2026-0416	Motion for a resolutionwith 17 co-authors	—
14 Sept 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Cuba, in particular the case of Félix Navarro and his daughter Saylí Navarro B-10-2026-0403	Motion for a resolutionwith 15 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the threat of war crimes, the escalating violations of international humanitarian law and the human rights situation in El-Obeid, Sudan B-10-2026-0361	Motion for a resolutionwith 18 co-authors	—
6 Jul 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre B-10-2026-0353	Motion for a resolutionwith 16 co-authors	—
18 Jun 2026	Human trafficking and human rights violations through recruitment of non-Russian nationals, in particular from Africa, for Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine E-10-2026-002532	Written questionwith 27 co-authors	6 Aug 2026
16 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Deteriorating situation of political prisoners in Belarus, in particular the case of Aliaksandra Pulinovich B-10-2026-0326	Motion for a resolutionwith 18 co-authors	—
16 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the Continued crackdown on civic space and fundamental freedoms in Burkina Faso B-10-2026-0320	Motion for a resolutionwith 14 co-authors	—
15 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Political prisoners in Nicaragua - the cases of Carlos Brenes, Salvadora del Socorro Martínez Aburto and Brooklyn Rivera B-10-2026-0315	Motion for a resolutionwith 12 co-authors	—
15 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland B-10-2026-0311	Motion for a resolutionwith 13 co-authors	—
12 Jun 2026	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the political repression and humanitarian situation in Cuba B-10-2026-0286	Motion for a resolutionwith 6 co-authors	—

Show all 91 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 60

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
19 Jun 2026	Clean corporate vehicles CJ46-AM-789892	CJ46	1
19 Jun 2026	Clean corporate vehicles CJ46-AM-790087	CJ46	17
11 Jun 2026	Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructure SEDE-AM-789927	SEDE	12
24 Apr 2026	Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 CJ05-AM-787836	CJ05	3
24 Apr 2026	Establishing the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2028-2034, amending Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 CJ05-AM-787837	CJ05	2
22 Apr 2026	2025 Commission report on Ukraine AFET-AM-786697	AFET	27
20 Apr 2026	Interim report in view of the consent procedure on the Political, Economic and Cooperation Strategic Partnership Agreement between the EU and Mexico CJ38-AM-787715	CJ38	15
19 Mar 2026	2025 Commission report on Georgia AFET-AM-786711	AFET	23
5 Mar 2026	Recommendation to the Council, the Commission and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union on Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on promoting transnational governance on water in the interests of conflict prevention and peace AFET-AM-785315	AFET	23
20 Feb 2026	Recommendation for the Council, for the Commission and for the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly AFET-AM-784240	AFET	35

Show all 60 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group Renew Europe Renew · Centre · liberalism, pro-Europeanism

National delegation

Delegation Estonia National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/129073?period=2026&scope=all&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Urmas PAET”. Member record. memberId 129073. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/129073?period=2026&scope=all&vscope=all (retrieved 26 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/129073. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/129073?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-129073,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Urmas PAET}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/129073?period=2026&scope=all&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/129073?period=2026&scope=all&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 129073. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/129073. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version 579b2832c723 (26 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within Renew

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 91

Amendments tabled in committee, 60

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928