Member

Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO

EPP · Italy

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Italy
Roll-call participation: 47.8 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line: 93.3 %ⓘ of 1 381 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.5 %

More facts (5)

National party: FI Forza Italia
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 64 of 1 317 votesⓘ
Committees: DEVE (substitute), ECON, ITRE
Member id: 124828

National party: FI Forza Italia
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 64 of 1 317 votesⓘ
Committees: DEVE (substitute), ECON, ITRE
Member id: 124828

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

47.8 %

1 381 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 91.0 % (−43.2 pts)

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

93.3 %

1 288 of 1 381 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.5 % (−0.3 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

4.9 %

64 of 1 317 votes where their group had a clear line

41 opposite (for ↔ against), 20 abstained against the line, 3 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

2.7 %

37 of 1 381 votes cast

Participation 47.8 % — EPP median 91.0 %, 187 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 187 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO	47.8 %
EPP median	91.0 %
Lowest in the group	23.2 %
Highest in the group	99.7 %
Members	187

With majority line 93.3 % — EPP median 93.5 %, 187 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 187 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO	93.3 %
EPP median	93.5 %
Lowest in the group	66.7 %
Highest in the group	98.9 %
Members	187

2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 24 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	41
10 Feb 2025	1	0
11 Feb 2025	32	0
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	29
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	223
13 Mar 2025	24	0
31 Mar 2025	3	0
1 Apr 2025	35	0
2 Apr 2025	251	0
3 Apr 2025	62	0
5 May 2025	5	3
6 May 2025	10	9
7 May 2025	220	0
8 May 2025	103	0
21 May 2025	2	0
22 May 2025	53	0
16 Jun 2025	2	0
17 Jun 2025	41	41
18 Jun 2025	91	91
19 Jun 2025	87	0
7 Jul 2025	1	0
8 Jul 2025	55	55
9 Jul 2025	134	131
10 Jul 2025	36	36
8 Sept 2025	1	1
9 Sept 2025	101	99
10 Sept 2025	34	0
11 Sept 2025	69	68
6 Oct 2025	2	2
7 Oct 2025	5	5
8 Oct 2025	55	0
9 Oct 2025	65	65
20 Oct 2025	3	3
21 Oct 2025	13	0
22 Oct 2025	186	0
23 Oct 2025	55	0
13 Nov 2025	267	220
24 Nov 2025	3	0
25 Nov 2025	75	0
26 Nov 2025	100	0
27 Nov 2025	125	124
15 Dec 2025	4	0
16 Dec 2025	66	66
17 Dec 2025	43	43
18 Dec 2025	42	0

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	95 % of 2 437 shared	89 %
Select Herbert DORFMANN	Herbert DORFMANN	EPP	Italy	95 % of 2 625 shared	89 %
Select Marie-Sophie CHRIST	Marie-Sophie CHRIST	EPP	Germany	95 % of 546 shared	89 %
Select Axel VOSS	Axel VOSS	EPP	Germany	95 % of 2 120 shared	89 %
Select Sven SIMON	Sven SIMON	EPP	Germany	95 % of 2 259 shared	89 %
Select Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ	Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ	EPP	Lithuania	95 % of 2 374 shared	89 %
Select Ralf SEEKATZ	Ralf SEEKATZ	EPP	Germany	95 % of 2 447 shared	89 %
Select Sandra KALNIETE	Sandra KALNIETE	EPP	Latvia	95 % of 2 423 shared	89 %
Select Oliver SCHENK	Oliver SCHENK	EPP	Germany	95 % of 2 612 shared	89 %
Select Siegfried MUREŞAN	Siegfried MUREŞAN	EPP	Romania	94 % of 2 623 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	87 % of 2 018 shared	82 %
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	86 % of 2 536 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	86 % of 2 320 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	86 % of 2 507 shared	82 %
Select Andreas GLÜCK	Andreas GLÜCK	Renew	Germany	86 % of 1 669 shared	82 %
Select Eugen TOMAC	Eugen TOMAC	Renew	Romania	86 % of 2 134 shared	82 %
Select Olivier CHASTEL	Olivier CHASTEL	Renew	Belgium	85 % of 2 438 shared	82 %
Select Bart GROOTHUIS	Bart GROOTHUIS	Renew	Netherlands	85 % of 1 996 shared	82 %
Select Svenja HAHN	Svenja HAHN	Renew	Germany	85 % of 2 476 shared	82 %
Select João COTRIM DE FIGUEIREDO	João COTRIM DE FIGUEIREDO	Renew	Portugal	85 % of 2 043 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on DevelopmentDEVE Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Economic and Monetary AffairsECON Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Industry, Research and EnergyITRE Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldEUDS Special committee	Member	23 Jan 2025	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)DASE Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America, including the EU-Central America Association Parliamentary CommitteeDCAM Delegation	Member	19 Sept 2024	now
Delegation for relations with Central AsiaDCAS Delegation	Substitute	19 Sept 2024	now
Intergroup on Christians in the Middle EastIG10-07 Intergroup / working group	Vice-chair	20 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on European Cultural Heritage, Ways of Saint James and other European Cultural RoutesIG10-11 Intergroup / working group	Member	29 Jan 2025	now

Show all 9 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Restructuring the Union framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (recast)	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	24 Feb 2026
Missione della Delegazione per le relazioni con i Paesi dell'America Centrale, incluso il comitato parlamentare di associazione UE-America centrale (DCAM) per lo svolgimento della 1° riunione della Commissione di Associazione Parlamentare UE-America Centrale a San José, Costa Rica dal 21 al 23 luglio 2025.	Official delegation	DCAM	7 Jul 2025
Amendment of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 as regards a shorter settlement cycle in the Union	Shadow rapporteur	ECON	6 May 2025

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

3 contributions recorded; 1 on behalf of their group; 6 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
14 Sept 2026	Council positions at first reading (Rule 64)	Speech · 1 min	Read
19 May 2026	The attack against citizens in Modena: protecting public spaces and preventing violence in the EU (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 3 min	Read
21 Oct 2024	Empowering the Single Market to deliver a sustainable future and prosperity for all EU citizens (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read

Questions and motions, 33

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
24 Aug 2026	The Ceuta migration crisis: potential jihadist infiltrations, securing Europe’s external borders and safeguarding the Schengen area E-10-2026-003310	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	Not yet answered
24 Aug 2026	The Ceuta migration crisis: potential jihadist infiltrations, securing Europe’s external borders and safeguarding the Schengen area E-10-2026-003309	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	Not yet answered
14 Aug 2026	The Lovable case and SEF funds: protecting EU public resources and preventing capital flight E-10-2026-003279	Written question	Not yet answered
7 Jul 2026	Enforcing the ban on medium-chain chlorinated paraffins (MCCPs) and ensuring a level playing field in the internal market E-10-2026-002799	Written questionwith 6 co-authors	25 Aug 2026
8 Jun 2026	Sardinia and Sicily: sharp increase in freight traffic costs and impact on businesses and consumers E-10-2026-002348	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	26 Aug 2026
13 May 2026	Stop tax evasion by means of foreign-plated vehicles: urgent measures to tackle tax and insurance fraud in the single market E-10-2026-002005	Written question	21 Sept 2026
6 May 2026	Continuity of tertiary education for pregnant women and women with children E-10-2026-001857	Written questionwith 46 co-authors	3 Jul 2026
27 Apr 2026	Urgent measures to tackle those who take advantage of the ‘last substantial transformation’ rule to obtain the ‘Made in Italy’ label for foreign products E-10-2026-001704	Written question	3 Jul 2026
18 Mar 2026	Industrial Accelerator Act and the risk of regulatory complexity for EU industry E-10-2026-001101	Written question	4 May 2026
11 Mar 2026	The Middle East crisis’ impact on energy prices and the potential use of extraordinary EU measures P-10-2026-001009	Priority written questionwith 8 co-authors	20 May 2026
28 Jan 2026	Extreme weather events in the Mediterranean: impact on Sicily, Sardinia and Calabria, and EU emergency, security and recovery action E-10-2026-000351	Written questionwith 8 co-authors	10 Apr 2026
4 Dec 2025	EU agreement with developing countries: European rice sector at risk E-10-2025-004825	Written question	20 Feb 2026
20 Nov 2025	EU strategies to combat banking desertification E-10-2025-004648	Written questionwith 8 co-authors	23 Jan 2026
10 Sept 2025	Alpine connections at risk: EU action to protect businesses and road transport E-10-2025-003515	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	23 Dec 2025
9 Sept 2025	Protection of journalists and investigation into killings in Gaza E-10-2025-003482	Written questionwith 108 co-authors	4 Nov 2025
22 Jul 2025	Reassessing the timetable and safeguards for ETS2: preventing price shocks and ensuring social readiness E-10-2025-003032	Written questionwith 48 co-authors	12 Nov 2025
17 Jul 2025	Tax avoidance by digital multinationals and protecting European SMEs E-10-2025-002986	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	2 Oct 2025
9 Jul 2025	Revision of the CO<sub>2</sub> emission standards for cars and vans P-10-2025-002795	Priority written questionwith 7 co-authors	20 Aug 2025
4 Jul 2025	Gibraltar, the amendment to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1675 and the threat to the single market E-10-2025-002743	Written question	2 Sept 2025
5 Jun 2025	Azerbaijan: the Ilham Aliyev regime and repression of media freedom E-10-2025-002279	Written question	17 Jul 2025
4 Jun 2025	Exclusion of finished products from the scope of Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 E-10-2025-002228	Written questionwith 5 co-authors	26 Aug 2025
30 May 2025	Simplifying Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 on deforestation E-10-2025-002176	Written questionwith 5 co-authors	29 Aug 2025
21 May 2025	Growing concerns over Morocco’s plans to cull three million stray dogs E-10-2025-002037	Written question	22 Jul 2025
16 Apr 2025	Privacy risks arising from the integration of AI on Meta’s digital platforms E-10-2025-001546	Written question	27 Jun 2025
3 Apr 2025	EU investments and actions for the active prevention of gender-based violence and femicide, including through smart video surveillance systems E-10-2025-001380	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	13 Jun 2025
31 Mar 2025	Russian drone flyover of Italian JRC site in Ispra E-10-2025-001317	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	23 May 2025
21 Feb 2025	Alarming increase in commissions charged by international payment card networks E-10-2025-000812	Written questionwith 1 co-author	24 Mar 2025
17 Feb 2025	Italy’s application of Directive 2006/123/EC to the health and social care sectors E-10-2025-000717	Written questionwith 6 co-authors	Not yet answered
30 Jan 2025	‘La Famiglia – The Great Mafia War’ E-10-2025-000415	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	24 Apr 2025
8 Jan 2025	Unfair competition from voluntary associations in tenders E-10-2025-000043	Written question	22 Apr 2025
4 Dec 2024	ETS: Measures to protect the maritime transport sector and Europe’s islands E-10-2024-002754	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	3 Mar 2025
26 Nov 2024	Fully honouring islands’ special situation in the EU E-10-2024-002662	Written questionwith 7 co-authors	15 Jan 2025
8 Oct 2024	Concerns about the absence of a commissioner for equality, and the future for the rights of people with disabilities E-10-2024-001978	Written questionwith 8 co-authors	7 Feb 2025

Amendments tabled in committee, 68

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
27 Jul 2026	Amending Regulations (EU) 2016/679, (EU) 2018/1724, (EU) 2018/1725, (EU) 2023/2854 and Directives 2002/58/EC, (EU) 2022/2555 and (EU) 2022/2557 as regards the simplification of the digital legislative framework, and repealing Regulations (EU) 2018/1807, (EU) 2019/1150, (EU) 2022/868, and Directive (EU) 2019/1024 (Digital Omnibus) CJ72-AM-791873	CJ72	2
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790005	CJ53	2
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790937	CJ53	7
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790936	CJ53	2
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790935	CJ53	1
5 Jun 2026	Establishing the European Competitiveness Fund ('ECF’), including the specific programme for defence research and innovation activities ITRE-AM-788898	ITRE	5
27 May 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2023/956 as regards the extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measures ITRE-AM-788838	ITRE	1
27 May 2026	Amending Directives (EU) 2018/2001, (EU) 2019/944, (EU) 2024/1788 as regards acceleration of permit-granting procedures ITRE-AM-788845	ITRE	3
19 May 2026	Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869 ITRE-AM-788941	ITRE	1
19 May 2026	Guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942, (EU) 2019/943 and (EU) 2024/1789 and repealing Regulation (EU) 2022/869 ITRE-AM-788939	ITRE	7

Show all 68 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Italy National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124828?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO”. Member record. memberId 124828. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124828?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124828. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/124828?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-124828,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124828?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/124828?docs=all&period=2025&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 124828. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/124828. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 33

Amendments tabled in committee, 68

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928