Member

Peter AGIUS

EPP · Malta

Group: EPP PPE
Country: Malta
Roll-call participation: 89.2 %ⓘ of 2 891 roll calls in office · chamber median 91.2 % · 2025, roll calls
With majority line: 91.0 %ⓘ of 2 579 votes where the group had a line · EPP median 93.5 %

More facts (5)

National party: PN Partit Nazzjonalista
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 172 of 2 466 votesⓘ
Committees: AGRI (substitute), IMCO, PETI, SANT (substitute)
Member id: 113523

National party: PN Partit Nazzjonalista
In office: Since 16 Jul 2024
Against clear line: 172 of 2 466 votesⓘ
Committees: AGRI (substitute), IMCO, PETI, SANT (substitute)
Member id: 113523

Cite this page

EP profile

Link to this page

Record

The member’s figures against the median of their group and of the chamber. Each vote counts the member in the group they belonged to that day.

Period Whole term 2024 (from July)2025 2026

Custom dates

Votes Final votes293 All roll calls2 891

Roll-call participation ⓘ

89.2 %

2 579 of 2 891 roll calls while in office

EPP median: 91.0 % (−1.8 pts)

Chamber median: 91.2 %

With majority line ⓘ

91.0 %

2 348 of 2 579 votes where their group had a line

EPP median: 93.5 % (−2.5 pts)

Against clear line ⓘ

7.0 %

172 of 2 466 votes where their group had a clear line

92 opposite (for ↔ against), 79 abstained against the line, 1 voted for or against when the line was to abstain

Abstention ⓘ

3.8 %

98 of 2 579 votes cast

Participation 89.2 % — EPP median 91.0 %, 187 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

Participation among the 187 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	Participation
Peter AGIUS	89.2 %
EPP median	91.0 %
Lowest in the group	23.2 %
Highest in the group	99.7 %
Members	187

With majority line 91.0 % — EPP median 93.5 %, 187 members.ⓘ

Data as a table

With majority line among the 187 members of the EPP with enough votes.
Figure	With majority line
Peter AGIUS	91.0 %
EPP median	93.5 %
Lowest in the group	66.7 %
Highest in the group	98.9 %
Members	187

2025, 2 891 roll-call votes. The dots are the other members of EPP; no ranks.
“No vote recorded” is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.
A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes — Parliament publishes no whip.

Votes, 5 928

Export

Every roll-call vote of the term with the member’s position, newest first.

Show Final votes All roll calls

Result: for–against–abstained. Majority line: how most of the member’s group voted that day (“Tie” when no position won). ≠ group marks a vote otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds, with at least 10 members voting) of their group.
Date	Decision and vote	Result	Position	Majority line
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 339 for, 225 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	Strengthening global health resilience in partner countries Final vote — text as a whole	Adopted 319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained	Position: Abstained ≠ group	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 73, adding text after recital H	181 for, 399 against, 2 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 16, adding text after recital G	252 for, 326 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 3	381 for, 190 against, 4 abstained	Position: No vote recorded	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 2	338 for, 233 against, 9 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Recital F — part 1	524 for, 48 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 58 to recital E	84 for, 484 against, 8 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 57, adding text after recital D	193 for, 389 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 56 to recital D	89 for, 494 against, 3 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendments 14 + 59 (voted as one), adding text after recital C	204 for, 381 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 61, adding text after recital C	215 for, 366 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 60, adding text after recital C	209 for, 378 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 55 to recital C	95 for, 486 against, 11 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 72, adding text after recital B	345 for, 242 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Separate vote on recital A	459 for, 120 against, 10 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 42, adding text after citation 5	439 for, 128 against, 30 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 40, adding text after citation 1	392 for, 132 against, 62 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 79, adding text after paragraph 15	448 for, 137 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2	297 for, 267 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1	304 for, 268 against, 21 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 71 to paragraph 14	92 for, 496 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13	330 for, 250 against, 16 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 70, adding text after paragraph 13	93 for, 493 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13	257 for, 331 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 13 — part 2	351 for, 232 against, 3 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 69 to paragraph 13	195 for, 392 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 12	390 for, 143 against, 64 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 4	441 for, 147 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 12 — part 3	427 for, 166 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 36 to paragraph 12	231 for, 355 against, 12 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11	261 for, 335 against, 4 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 52 to paragraph 11	259 for, 336 against, 7 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 10 to paragraph 11	208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 68 to paragraph 11	235 for, 358 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10	277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 3	353 for, 240 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 2	363 for, 231 against, 7 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Paragraph 10 — part 1	390 for, 205 against, 4 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 9	203 for, 392 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 9	266 for, 295 against, 37 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8	215 for, 335 against, 54 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 48 to paragraph 8	261 for, 316 against, 27 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 78, adding text after paragraph 7	395 for, 204 against, 5 abstained	Position: For	Majority line: For
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 7	177 for, 418 against, 13 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7	204 for, 395 against, 5 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7	202 for, 380 against, 18 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 30 to paragraph 7	253 for, 329 against, 22 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 65 to paragraph 7	91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against
17 Sept 2026	The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external borders Amendment 29 to paragraph 6	261 for, 340 against, 6 abstained	Position: Against	Majority line: Against

Show all 50 votes on this page

Roll-call participation

One cell per sitting while in office, shaded by the share of that day’s roll calls the member voted in. The official attendance register is kept separately by Parliament.

No vote recorded on 9 of 51 sittings with roll calls.

"No vote recorded" is not the same as absent: leave, illness and chairing the sitting look the same.

Data as a table

Roll calls held at each sitting while in office and how many of them the member voted in.
Sitting	Roll calls	Voted in
20 Jan 2025	2	2
21 Jan 2025	1	1
22 Jan 2025	2	2
23 Jan 2025	45	42
10 Feb 2025	1	0
11 Feb 2025	32	32
12 Feb 2025	10	10
13 Feb 2025	30	29
10 Mar 2025	2	2
11 Mar 2025	9	9
12 Mar 2025	228	223
13 Mar 2025	24	22
31 Mar 2025	3	3
1 Apr 2025	35	35
2 Apr 2025	251	249
3 Apr 2025	62	62
5 May 2025	5	5
6 May 2025	10	9
7 May 2025	220	217
8 May 2025	103	90
21 May 2025	2	2
22 May 2025	53	53
16 Jun 2025	2	2
17 Jun 2025	41	41
18 Jun 2025	91	91
19 Jun 2025	87	0
7 Jul 2025	1	0
8 Jul 2025	55	54
9 Jul 2025	134	134
10 Jul 2025	36	36
8 Sept 2025	1	1
9 Sept 2025	101	101
10 Sept 2025	34	30
11 Sept 2025	69	68
6 Oct 2025	2	0
7 Oct 2025	5	0
8 Oct 2025	55	0
9 Oct 2025	65	65
20 Oct 2025	3	3
21 Oct 2025	13	13
22 Oct 2025	186	186
23 Oct 2025	55	54
13 Nov 2025	267	263
24 Nov 2025	3	0
25 Nov 2025	75	0
26 Nov 2025	100	100
27 Nov 2025	125	125
15 Dec 2025	4	4
16 Dec 2025	66	66
17 Dec 2025	43	43
18 Dec 2025	42	0

Voting neighbours

Members who voted the same way most often in the roll calls they both took part in, within and outside the member’s group (group at the date of each vote), over all roll calls of the term.

At least 200 shared roll calls over at least six months in office together. Within = both sat in the same group on the date of the vote; a member who changed group can appear on both lists. Baseline = the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the date of each shared vote (within: the group they shared; outside: the two groups), weighted by the votes they shared in each combination.

Within EPP

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in the same group (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of that group.
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select David CASA	David CASA	EPP	Malta	97 % of 4 626 shared	89 %
Select Marie-Sophie CHRIST	Marie-Sophie CHRIST	EPP	Germany	94 % of 1 061 shared	89 %
Select Manfred WEBER	Manfred WEBER	EPP	Germany	94 % of 3 733 shared	89 %
Select Willemien KONING	Willemien KONING	EPP	Netherlands	94 % of 1 336 shared	89 %
Select Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ	Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ	EPP	Lithuania	93 % of 3 758 shared	89 %
Select Peter LIESE	Peter LIESE	EPP	Germany	93 % of 4 403 shared	89 %
Select Liudas MAŽYLIS	Liudas MAŽYLIS	EPP	Lithuania	93 % of 4 303 shared	89 %
Select Sven SIMON	Sven SIMON	EPP	Germany	93 % of 3 953 shared	89 %
Select Michael GAHLER	Michael GAHLER	EPP	Germany	93 % of 4 440 shared	89 %
Select Stefan KÖHLER	Stefan KÖHLER	EPP	Germany	93 % of 4 246 shared	89 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Outside the group

Agreement: roll calls where both cast the same position, of the roll calls both voted in while in different groups (“shared”); a count below 50 shared. Baseline: the median agreement of every pair of members of the groups the two sat in on those votes (groups at the date, weighted by the votes shared in each combination).
Select	Member	Group	Country	Agreement	Baseline
Select Urmas PAET	Urmas PAET	Renew	Estonia	84 % of 4 164 shared	82 %
Select Andreas GLÜCK	Andreas GLÜCK	Renew	Germany	84 % of 3 223 shared	82 %
Select Hilde VAUTMANS	Hilde VAUTMANS	Renew	Belgium	84 % of 4 623 shared	82 %
Select Dan BARNA	Dan BARNA	Renew	Romania	83 % of 4 084 shared	82 %
Select Katri KULMUNI	Katri KULMUNI	Renew	Finland	83 % of 3 968 shared	82 %
Select Bart GROOTHUIS	Bart GROOTHUIS	Renew	Netherlands	83 % of 3 833 shared	82 %
Select Olivier CHASTEL	Olivier CHASTEL	Renew	Belgium	83 % of 4 315 shared	82 %
Select Anouk VAN BRUG	Anouk VAN BRUG	Renew	Netherlands	83 % of 3 556 shared	82 %
Select Elsi KATAINEN	Elsi KATAINEN	Renew	Finland	83 % of 4 707 shared	82 %
Select Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN	Marie-Agnes STRACK-ZIMMERMANN	Renew	Germany	82 % of 3 728 shared	82 %

Show all 10 neighbours

Work

Seats in committees, delegations and intergroups, and the dossiers the member leads, shadows or negotiates.

Seats

Body: the committee, delegation or intergroup, with its kind. Role: the member’s role in it. From, To: the dates of the seat (“now” while it lasts).
Body	Role	From	To
Committee on Agriculture and Rural DevelopmentAGRI Committee	Substitute	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer ProtectionIMCO Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on PetitionsPETI Committee	Member	19 Jul 2024	now
Committee on Public HealthSANT Committee	Substitute	23 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Anti-CorruptionIG10-01 Intergroup / working group	Member	16 Jan 2025	now
Intergroup on Biodiversity, Hunting and CountrysideIG10-04 Intergroup / working group	Member	4 Feb 2025	now
Intergroup on Sustainable LivestockIG10-15 Intergroup / working group	Member	31 Jan 2025	now

Show all 7 seats

Dossiers

Dossier: the procedure the declaration names (“No dossier named” for a delegation without one). Role: rapporteur, shadow rapporteur, negotiator or delegation. Committee: the committee that appointed them. Date: of the declaration.
Dossier	Role	Committee	Date
Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2026	Opinion rapporteur	PETI	25 Aug 2026
CONT Mission to Malta \n\nI am not a member of CONT but I will be part of this delegation visit to Malta as a Maltese MEP	Official delegation		26 Mar 2026
A new legislative framework that is fit for the digital and sustainable transition	Shadow rapporteur	IMCO	13 Jan 2025
Amending Regulations (EU) No 1024/2012 and (EU) 2018/1724 as regards the use of the Internal Market Information System and the Single Digital Gateway […] on European cross-border associations	Shadow rapporteur	IMCO	13 Jan 2025
shadow on ombudsman annual report	Shadow rapporteur	PETI	10 Sept 2024

Show all 5 dossier roles

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

Counts: dossiers they spoke on, led or amended, and their questions and motions.

In the chamber

Speeches and statements in plenary debates, newest first; the verbatim report is on Parliament’s site.

17 contributions recorded; 2 on behalf of their group; 28 minutes of speaking time.

Date: the sitting. Debate: the item debated, and the group when they spoke on its behalf. Kind: speech or written statement, with speaking time. Verbatim: the verbatim report on Parliament’s site.
Date	Debate	Kind	Verbatim
8 Jul 2026	The EU’s role in the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip and the accountability of Israel under international law (topical debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
10 Mar 2026	Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
16 Dec 2025	European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’ (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
21 Oct 2025	Delayed justice and rule of law backsliding in Malta, eight years after Daphne Caruana Galizia’s assassination (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
20 Oct 2025	A new legislative framework for products that is fit for the digital and sustainable transition (debate) on behalf of EPP	Speech · 2 min	Read
8 Oct 2025	The role of simple tax rules and tax fragmentation in European competitiveness (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
22 May 2025	Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read
22 May 2025	Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 (debate)	Speech · 4 min	Read
7 May 2025	Malta's Golden Passport scheme circumventing EU sanctions against Russia (debate)	Speech · 2 min	Read
11 Mar 2025	Presentation of the proposal on Critical Medicines Act (CMA) (debate)	Speech · 1 min	Read

Show all 17 recent contributions

Questions and motions, 22

Parliamentary questions and motions for resolutions the member authored or co-signed, newest first.

Date: tabled. Title: the question or motion, with its id. Kind: written question or motion for a resolution, with the number of co-authors. Answer: the date of the answer to a question.
Date	Title	Kind	Answer
8 Jun 2026	Ensuring sufficient accredited verifier capacity for CBAM compliance E-10-2026-002345	Written question	30 Jul 2026
22 Apr 2026	Anti-tankering rules and risk of disruptions to flights to and from Malta due to jet fuel shortages E-10-2026-001649	Written question	22 Jul 2026
25 Mar 2026	Rising memory component costs and spillover risks for consumer devices E-10-2026-001238	Written question	21 May 2026
12 Feb 2026	EU intervention following the severe environmental disaster caused by Cyclone Harry in southern Italy E-10-2026-000629	Written questionwith 23 co-authors	4 May 2026
15 Dec 2025	Updated opinion of the European Food Safety Authority on the effects of energy drink consumption by minors P-10-2025-004940	Priority written questionwith 1 co-author	30 Jan 2026
9 Dec 2025	MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the European citizens’ initiative entitled ‘My Voice, My Choice: For Safe and Accessible Abortion’ B-10-2025-0557	Motion for a resolutionwith 35 co-authors	—
19 Nov 2025	Extra costs for intra-EU deliveries to island Member States E-10-2025-004624	Written question	21 Jan 2026
19 Nov 2025	Malta’s projected emissions increase from incinerators in Magħtab and EU Emissions Trading System allowances E-10-2025-004623	Written question	8 Jan 2026
19 Nov 2025	Supporting food security in small Member States E-10-2025-004625	Written question	27 Jan 2026
21 Oct 2025	Illegal fishing of dolphinfish by Tunisian vessels using Maltese floating aggregate devices P-10-2025-004136	Priority written question	13 Nov 2025

Show all 22 questions and motions

Amendments tabled in committee, 45

Committee amendment documents that carry amendments by the member, with how many are theirs.

Date: of the amendment document. Text amended: the dossier and the document’s id. Committee: where the amendments were tabled. Amendments: how many in the document are the member’s.
Date	Text amended	Committee	Amendments
11 Sept 2026	Modernised rules for patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare SANT-AM-792154	SANT	6
11 Sept 2026	Modernised rules for patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare SANT-AM-792014	SANT	17
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790937	CJ53	2
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790936	CJ53	1
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790915	AGRI	1
13 Jul 2026	Establishing the conditions for the implementation of the Union support to the Common Agriculture Policy for the period from 2028 to 2034 AGRI-AM-790958	AGRI	1
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790935	CJ53	4
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790939	CJ53	3
13 Jul 2026	Establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Union’s biotechnology and biomanufacturing sectors particularly in the area of health and amending Regulations (EC) No 178/2002, (EC) No 1394/2007, (EU) No 536/2014, (EU) 2019/6, (EU) 2024/795 and (EU) 2024/1938 (European Biotech Act) CJ53-AM-790934	CJ53	4
23 Jun 2026	on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the European Fund for economic, social and territorial cohesion, agriculture and rural, fisheries and maritime, prosperity and security for the period 2028-2034 and amending Regulation (EU) 2023/955 and Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 CJ71-AM-790105	CJ71	1

Show all 45 amendment documents

Connections

Dossiers they lead or shadow, committees, party, delegation and other related pages.

Political group

Group European People’s Party EPP · Centre-right · Christian democracy, conservatism

National delegation

Delegation Malta National delegation

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/113523?period=2025&vscope=all
Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament
Data source: EP Open Data: member record
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version: data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Peter AGIUS”. Member record. memberId 113523. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/113523?period=2025&vscope=all (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official source: Member’s profile, European Parliament, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/113523. Data: EP Open Data: member record, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meps/113523?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.

BibTeX

@misc{epw-member-113523,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Peter AGIUS}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/113523?period=2025&vscope=all}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/members/113523?period=2025&vscope=all},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Member record. memberId 113523. Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/meps/en/113523. Data: EP Open Data: member record (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}

Record

Votes, 5 928

Roll-call participation

Voting neighbours

Within EPP

Outside the group

Work

Seats

Dossiers

Topics they work on (model-assigned)

In the chamber

Questions and motions, 22

Amendments tabled in committee, 45

Connections

Political group

National delegation

Sources & citation

Cite as

Votes, 5 928