Skip to content

Decision

Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland

Effect
Adopted
Result
412 for · 63 against · 53 abstained roll call
Date
18 June 2026, 13:28–13:34
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Motion for a resolution
Topics
Foreign affairsDefence & security Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
33 votes · 23 roll calls · 5 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call) · Greens (1 split vote) · Renew (1 roll call) · EPP (1 split vote) · ECR (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · Patriots (1 roll call)
Final vote
194611
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 412 for, 63 against, 53 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 5 amendments (5 rejected) and 20 parts of the text voted on separately (17 adopted, 3 rejected). 7 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP, ECR and Patriots; opposed by ESN; The Left split.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 7Against 15Abst. 15No vote 8 of 45Majority line TieClear line Divided Cohesion 0.11
GreensFor 33Against 0Abst. 7No vote 13 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.74
S&DFor 101Against 0Abst. 2No vote 32 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
RenewFor 60Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 128Against 0Abst. 1No vote 56 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 53Against 1Abst. 4No vote 24 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
PatriotsFor 27Against 10Abst. 21No vote 27 of 85Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.20
ESNFor 0Against 21Abst. 1No vote 5 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 3Against 16Abst. 2No vote 8 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 16

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria126020.50
Belgium102370.50
Bulgaria93050.63
Cyprus0006—
Czechia141150.81
Germany50184240.54
Denmark140011.00
Estonia5002—
Spain3729120.66
Finland110041.00
France43013250.65
Greece76080.31
Croatia9003—
Hungary05016—
Ireland90320.63
Italy351012190.42
Lithuania6005—
Luxembourg4101—
Latvia8001—
Malta4002—
Netherlands230620.69
Poland4011110.93
Portugal161130.83
Romania1710150.92
Sweden180031.00
Slovenia5004—
Slovakia66030.25

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 528 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Nathalie LOISEAU FranceRenewSpeeches118 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sabine VERHEYEN GermanyEPPSpeeches118 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Javi LÓPEZ SpainS&DSpeeches516 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Dan NICA RomaniaS&DSpeeches216 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Siegbert Frank DROESE GermanyESNSpeeches216 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Vytenis Povilas ANDRIUKAITIS LithuaniaS&DSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Show the other 44 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Merja KYLLÖNEN FinlandThe LeftSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS LithuaniaRenewSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Maria GRAPINI RomaniaS&DSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Siegfried MUREŞAN RomaniaEPPSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Daniel BUDA RomaniaEPPSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Kostas PAPADAKIS GreeceNo groupSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Jussi SARAMO FinlandThe LeftSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Jüri RATAS EstoniaEPPSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Elsi KATAINEN FinlandRenewSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Jaak MADISON EstoniaECRSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sven MIKSER EstoniaS&DSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Łukasz KOHUT PolandEPPSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Juan Ignacio ZOIDO ÁLVAREZ SpainEPPSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Milan UHRÍK SlovakiaESNSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Eero HEINÄLUOMA FinlandS&DSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Nils UŠAKOVS LatviaS&DSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Anna-Maja HENRIKSSON FinlandRenewSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Maria OHISALO FinlandGreensSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Mihai TUDOSE RomaniaS&DSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Pierre-Romain THIONNET FrancePatriotsSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group No vote recorded
Rihards KOLS LatviaECRSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Michael GAHLER GermanyEPPSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Pekka TOVERI FinlandEPPSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN FinlandECRSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Dainius ŽALIMAS LithuaniaRenewSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Reinis POZŅAKS LatviaECRSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Mārtiņš STAĶIS LatviaGreensSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Lukas SIEPER changed group GermanyRenewSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Michał SZCZERBA PolandEPPSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Dariusz JOŃSKI PolandEPPSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Marta WCISŁO PolandEPPSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Maciej WĄSIK PolandECRSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Alice TEODORESCU MÅWE SwedenEPPSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Dan BARNA RomaniaRenewSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Georgiana TEODORESCU RomaniaECRSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS RomaniaNo groupSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Diana IOVANOVICI ŞOŞOACĂ RomaniaNo groupSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Danilo DELLA VALLE ItalyThe LeftSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Petar VOLGIN BulgariaESNSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ RomaniaGreensSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Victor NEGRESCU RomaniaS&DSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group No vote recorded
Vilija BLINKEVIČIŪTĖ LithuaniaS&DSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Juan Fernando LÓPEZ AGUILAR SpainS&DSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sandra KALNIETE LatviaEPPSpeeches116 Jun 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 33

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Separate vote on paragraph 1 B10-0295/2026 – § 1 Roll call522 for, 4 against, 26 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots
2Separate vote on paragraph 2 B10-0295/2026 – § 2 Roll call503 for, 12 against, 37 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots
3Vote on text inserted after paragraph 6 Show of hands Rejected
Show the other 32 votesShow the other 30 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Separate vote on paragraph 2 B10-0295/2026 – § 2 Roll call503 for, 12 against, 37 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots
3Vote on text inserted after paragraph 6 Show of hands Rejected
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Vote on text inserted after paragraph 6 Show of hands Rejected
5Paragraph 9 — part 1 B10-0295/2026 – § 9/1 Part voted on: “Reiterates its call for the urgent establishment of a genuine European Defence Union, including proposals for swift decision-making processes, going beyond existing frameworks, including the White Paper for European Defence – Readiness 2030 and the subsequent Defence Readiness Roadmap 2030;”Roll call319 for, 190 against, 38 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots, ECR; split: ECR
6Paragraph 9 — part 2 B10-0295/2026 – § 9/2 Part voted on: ‘underlines that deeper integration, coordination and the pooling of resources are indispensable to an effective EU response to Russia’s escalating threats;’Roll call357 for, 144 against, 49 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: ECR
7Paragraph 9 — part 3 B10-0295/2026 – § 9/3 Part voted on: “calls for the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base and its production capacity across the EU to be boosted through enhanced EU-level coordination, maximising the use of national initiatives and EU instruments;”Roll call408 for, 96 against, 38 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: ECR
8Separate vote on paragraph 19 Show of hands Adopted
9Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 25 B10-0295/2026 – After § 25 – Am 4 Roll call84 for, 416 against, 42 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
10Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 25 B10-0295/2026 – After § 25 – Am 5 Roll call85 for, 413 against, 47 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
11Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 25 B10-0295/2026 – After § 25 – Am 6 Roll call62 for, 418 against, 68 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
12Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 25 B10-0295/2026 – After § 25 – Am 7 Roll call81 for, 397 against, 69 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
13Separate vote on recital A B10-0295/2026 – Recital A Roll call491 for, 28 against, 28 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots
14Recital B — part 1 B10-0295/2026 – Recital B/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘instrumentalisation of irregular migration,’”Roll call484 for, 34 against, 25 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: Greens
15Recital B — part 2 B10-0295/2026 – Recital B/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call341 for, 180 against, 21 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: Greens
16Separate vote on recital C B10-0295/2026 – Recital C Roll call497 for, 30 against, 18 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots
17Separate vote on recital D B10-0295/2026 – Recital D Roll call510 for, 7 against, 25 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots
18Separate vote on recital E B10-0295/2026 – Recital E Roll call489 for, 28 against, 19 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots
19Separate vote on recital F B10-0295/2026 – Recital F Roll call517 for, 10 against, 20 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots
20Recital G — part 1 B10-0295/2026 – Recital G/1 Part voted on: “whereas on 7 May 2026, two Ukrainian drones, jammed by Russian electronic warfare systems, struck a fuel storage depot in Rēzekne, Latvia;”Roll call495 for, 23 against, 23 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: EPP
21Recital G — part 2 B10-0295/2026 – Recital G/2 Part voted on: ‘whereas the Latvian military’s five-hour delay in communicating its response, the lack of public warnings in Rēzekne and the failure of initial radar detection ignited an intense public backlash, causing a political crisis that led to the collapse of the Latvian Government;’Roll call149 for, 331 against, 60 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: EPP
22Separate vote on recital I B10-0295/2026 – Recital I Roll call517 for, 10 against, 20 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots
23Separate vote on recital J B10-0295/2026 – Recital J Roll call500 for, 6 against, 34 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots
24Separate vote on recital M B10-0295/2026 – Recital M Roll call498 for, 20 against, 24 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots
25Amendment 1, adding text after recital N B10-0295/2026 – After recital N – Am 1 Roll call136 for, 394 against, 8 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
26Final vote — text as a whole B10-0295/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call412 for, 63 against, 53 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew
27Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0295/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
28Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0296/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
29Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0304/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
30Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0307/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
31Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0308/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
32Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0309/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
33Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0311/2026 Show of hands Lapsed

Roll calls requested by The Left, Renew, ECR, Patriots · split votes by Greens, EPP, ECR.

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-10-2026-0307

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution condemning Russia's repeated deliberate violations of EU member states' airspace and territory, including drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland.

The text expresses solidarity with affected countries and stresses the need for EU member states to stand united against Russia's provocations.

It also calls for improved drone detection and defence systems, including equipping civilian authorities and protecting critical infrastructure.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution condemns Russia's drone incursions into EU member states' airspace, calling for improved detection and defense, new funding, stricter sanctions, and visa restrictions.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2026/2772(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject

Parliament adopted the text on 18 June 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 3 steps of the dossier
  1. Tabled for plenary (done)
  2. Plenary vote · Adopted 18 June 2026 (done)
  3. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 11 connections: Running issue: Russia's war against Ukraine · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: Russia's war against Ukraine

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland”. Decision, 18 June 2026. votingId 194611, document B-10-2026-0307, reference 2026/2772(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-18/10 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 18 June 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-06-18/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-06-18-10,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-06-18},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-18/10}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-06-18/10},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 194611, document B-10-2026-0307, reference 2026/2772(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-06-18-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-06-18 (CC BY 4.0)}
}