Skip to content

Decision

Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine

Effect
Adopted
Result
437 for · 82 against · 70 abstained roll call
Date
24 February 2026, 11:36–11:46
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a large majority
Source
Motion for a resolution
Topics
Foreign affairsDefence & security Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
62 votes · 43 roll calls · 22 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call, 4 split votes) · EPP (1 roll call, 1 split vote) · ECR (1 roll call, 7 split votes) · Patriots (1 roll call, 4 split votes)
Final vote
185885
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 437 for, 82 against, 70 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a large majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 22 amendments (9 adopted, 13 rejected) and 32 parts of the text voted on separately (29 adopted, 3 rejected). 7 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Backed by Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by The Left and ESN; Patriots mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 8Against 17Abst. 15No vote 6 of 46Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.14
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 4No vote 6 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.87
S&DFor 111Against 0Abst. 3No vote 21 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
RenewFor 65Against 0Abst. 1No vote 10 of 76Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 149Against 0Abst. 2No vote 35 of 186Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
ECRFor 51Against 2Abst. 6No vote 20 of 79Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.80
PatriotsFor 8Against 21Abst. 39No vote 16 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
ESNFor 1Against 22Abst. 0No vote 5 of 28Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
No groupFor 1Against 20Abst. 0No vote 10 of 31Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK changed group, Jessika VAN LEEUWEN changed group, Lukas SIEPER changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Nikolas FARANTOURIS changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Sander SMIT changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 19

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria126020.50
Belgium174010.71
Bulgaria103040.65
Cyprus3111—
Czechia153120.68
Germany55182210.60
Denmark130110.89
Estonia1006—
Spain453660.75
Finland130021.00
France26037180.38
Greece87150.25
Croatia100021.00
Hungary07014—
Ireland100400.57
Italy4791190.55
Lithuania100011.00
Luxembourg5100—
Latvia8001—
Malta2022—
Netherlands205140.65
Poland3540140.85
Portugal161220.76
Romania253140.79
Sweden190021.00
Slovenia7002—
Slovakia57030.38

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 589 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches424 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Petras AUŠTREVIČIUS LithuaniaRenewSpeeches224 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Terry REINTKE GermanyGreensSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Siegfried MUREŞAN RomaniaEPPSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Jordan BARDELLA FrancePatriotsSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Abstained
Valérie HAYER FranceRenewSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Show the other 28 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Martin SCHIRDEWAN GermanyThe LeftSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Abstained
Tomasz FROELICH GermanyESNSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Sergey LAGODINSKY GermanyGreensSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Özlem DEMIREL GermanyThe LeftSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Marina KALJURAND EstoniaS&DSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Joachim Stanisław BRUDZIŃSKI PolandECRSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Andrzej HALICKI PolandEPPSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Beata SZYDŁO PolandECRSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Nacho SÁNCHEZ AMOR SpainS&DSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Milan UHRÍK SlovakiaESNSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Ville NIINISTÖ FinlandGreensSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Nicola PROCACCINI ItalyECRSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Rasa JUKNEVIČIENĖ LithuaniaEPPSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Thijs REUTEN NetherlandsS&DSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Michael GAHLER GermanyEPPSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Adam BIELAN PolandECRSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Sebastian TYNKKYNEN FinlandECRSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Jean-Marc GERMAIN FranceS&DSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Reinis POZŅAKS LatviaECRSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Alexander JUNGBLUTH GermanyESNSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Alexander SELL GermanyESNSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Nicolás PASCUAL DE LA PARTE SpainEPPSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA PolandECRSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Jagna MARCZUŁAJTIS-WALCZAK PolandEPPSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Ruth FIRMENICH GermanyNo groupSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Csaba DÖMÖTÖR HungaryPatriotsSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Iratxe GARCÍA PÉREZ SpainS&DSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Sandra KALNIETE LatviaEPPSpeeches124 Feb 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 62

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Paragraph 4 — part 1 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 4/1 Part voted on: ‘Reaffirms that Ukraine’s future lies in the EU;’Roll call422 for, 81 against, 58 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: ECR
2Paragraph 4 — part 2 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 4/2 Part voted on: ‘recognises Ukraine’s European integration as a strategic priority for the EU, and calls for the EU and its Member States to prepare for future enlargement by implementing internal reforms and developing a clear strategy for enlargement; underlines the importance of accelerating Ukraine’s gradual integration into the EU single market;’Roll call372 for, 134 against, 57 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR, Patriots; split: ECR
3Separate vote on paragraph 5 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: The Left
Show the other 61 votesShow the other 59 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Paragraph 4 — part 2 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 4/2 Part voted on: ‘recognises Ukraine’s European integration as a strategic priority for the EU, and calls for the EU and its Member States to prepare for future enlargement by implementing internal reforms and developing a clear strategy for enlargement; underlines the importance of accelerating Ukraine’s gradual integration into the EU single market;’Roll call372 for, 134 against, 57 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR, Patriots; split: ECR
3Separate vote on paragraph 5 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: The Left
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Paragraph 5 — part 2 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 5/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call492 for, 70 against, 15 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left; split: The Left
5Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 5 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 5 – Am 3/REV Roll call91 for, 462 against, 26 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
6Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 5 – Am 4/REV Roll call119 for, 428 against, 40 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR, The Left
7Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 5 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 5 – Am 22 Roll call272 for, 243 against, 66 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
8Paragraph 6 — part 1 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 6/1 Part voted on: ‘Calls for the EU, its Member States, their transatlantic allies and international partners to undertake even more effective military, political and diplomatic efforts’ without the words ‘their transatlantic allies’Roll call528 for, 28 against, 32 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left, EPP; split: EPP, Patriots, The Left
9Paragraph 6 — part 2 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 6/2 Part voted on: “their transatlantic allies”Roll call464 for, 72 against, 51 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left, EPP; split: EPP, Patriots, The Left
10Paragraph 6 — part 3 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 6/3 Part voted on: “military”Roll call469 for, 105 against, 13 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left, EPP; split: EPP, Patriots, The Left
11Paragraph 6 — part 4 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 6/4 Part voted on: “political and diplomatic efforts”Roll call578 for, 5 against, 3 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left, EPP; split: EPP, Patriots, The Left
12Paragraph 6 — part 5 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 6/5 Part voted on: ‘and in particular to massively increase military support to Ukraine and substantially enhance comprehensive pressure on Russia’ without the words ‘to massively increase’ and ‘military’Roll call492 for, 58 against, 31 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left, EPP; split: EPP, Patriots, The Left
13Paragraph 6 — part 6 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 6/6 Part voted on: “to massively increase”Roll call405 for, 146 against, 38 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left, Patriots, EPP; split: EPP, Patriots, The Left
14Paragraph 6 — part 7 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 6/7 Part voted on: “military”Roll call426 for, 111 against, 51 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left, EPP; split: EPP, Patriots, The Left
15Paragraph 6 — part 8 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 6/8 Part voted on: ‘in order to definitively stop Russia’s war of aggression and enable Ukraine to liberate all its people and re-establish full control over its entire territory within its internationally recognised borders;’Roll call534 for, 29 against, 18 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left, EPP; split: EPP, Patriots, The Left
16Paragraph 7 — part 1 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 7/1 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘regrets the fact, however, that these security guarantees would only be implemented once a ceasefire is agreed upon;’”Roll call455 for, 86 against, 46 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left; split: ECR
17Paragraph 7 — part 2 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 7/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call413 for, 115 against, 60 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left; split: ECR
18Separate vote on paragraph 8 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: The Left
19Paragraph 8 — part 2 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 8/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call445 for, 116 against, 36 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left; split: The Left
20Separate vote on paragraph 9 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR, Patriots
21Paragraph 9 — part 2 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 9/2 Part voted on: “but expresses its concern about the US approach towards peace talks, which appears to prioritise short-term dealmaking”Roll call403 for, 128 against, 66 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: ECR, Patriots
22Paragraph 9 — part 3 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 9/3 Part voted on: “and the preservation of “strategic stability” with Russia over genuine peace talks”Roll call405 for, 124 against, 66 abstained AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR, Patriots
23Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 11 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 11 – Am 5 Roll call103 for, 436 against, 50 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
24Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 11 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 11 – Am 6 Roll call129 for, 418 against, 48 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
25Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 11 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 11 – Am 7/REV Roll call99 for, 485 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
26Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 11 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 11 – Am 8 Roll call141 for, 378 against, 71 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
27Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 11 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 11 – Am 9 Roll call216 for, 321 against, 55 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
28Paragraph 12 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘to use the cash balances associated with Russian sovereign assets immobilised under EU sanctions’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
29Paragraph 12 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “those words”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR
30Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 12 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 12 – Am 10 Roll call114 for, 389 against, 93 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
31Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 12 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 12 – Am 11 Roll call85 for, 440 against, 73 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
32Paragraph 13 — part 1 of 2 Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘in coordination with NATO’ and ‘urges the lifting of remaining restrictions preventing the use of Western weapons systems delivered to Ukraine against military targets on Russian territory’”Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: ECR, The Left
33Paragraph 13 — part 2 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 13/2 Part voted on: “in coordination with NATO”Roll call455 for, 68 against, 65 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left; split: ECR, The Left
34Paragraph 13 — part 2 of 2 Part voted on: “in coordination with NATO”Show of hands AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left; split: ECR, The Left
35Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 14 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 14 – Am 12 Roll call117 for, 404 against, 80 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
36Separate vote on paragraph 15 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots
37Paragraph 15 — part 2 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 15/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call454 for, 128 against, 15 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots
38Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 15 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 15 – Am 13 Roll call163 for, 393 against, 39 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
39Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 15 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 15 – Am 14 Roll call153 for, 385 against, 49 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
40Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 16 — part 1 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 16 – Am 15/1 Part voted on: “Strongly condemns the use of sexual and gender-based violence as a weapon of war and stresses that this constitutes a war crime;”Roll call578 for, 7 against, 12 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR, The Left; split: ECR
41Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 16 — part 2 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 16 – Am 15/2 Part voted on: “also condemns sexual and gender-based violence”Roll call571 for, 10 against, 14 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR, The Left; split: ECR
42Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 16 — part 3 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 16 – Am 15/3 Part voted on: “in the transit centres in Ukraine and across the EU”Roll call308 for, 247 against, 40 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR, The Left; split: ECR
43Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 16 — part 4 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 16 – Am 15/4 Part voted on: ‘regrets the fact that the Temporary Protection Directive is interpreted so narrowly that many women who have fled Russia’s war of aggression cannot access abortion care or other sexual and reproductive health treatments, including treatment following sexual abuse; reiterates its call, in its resolution of 29 February 2024, on the Commission to review the directive in order to ensure that all Member States are obliged to offer the same care that women could otherwise receive in Ukraine;’Roll call350 for, 187 against, 56 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR, The Left; split: ECR
44Amendment 16, adding text after paragraph 16 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 16 – Am 16 Roll call476 for, 14 against, 105 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
45Separate vote on paragraph 18 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 18 Roll call542 for, 29 against, 17 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
46Separate vote on paragraph 21 Counted258 for, 303 against, 33 abstained Rejected
47Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 21 — part 1 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 21 – Am 18/1 Part voted on: ‘Welcomes Ukraine’s accession to the International Criminal Court (ICC); reaffirms its strong support for the ICC’s investigation in Ukraine and its overall efforts to prosecute individuals responsible for genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and the crime of aggression;’Roll call495 for, 29 against, 68 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR, The Left; split: ECR
48Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 21 — part 2 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 21 – Am 18/2 Part voted on: “expresses its utmost concern about the US sanctions against the ICC, its prosecutors, judges and staff; calls on the Commission to activate the Blocking Statute to protect the ICC from extraterritorial sanctions;”Roll call373 for, 155 against, 60 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR, The Left; split: ECR
49Amendment 19, adding text after paragraph 22 RC-B10-0143/2026 – After § 22 – Am 19 Roll call280 for, 267 against, 47 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: The Left
50Separate vote on paragraph 23 Show of hands AdoptedRequested bysplit: Patriots
51Paragraph 23 — part 2 RC-B10-0143/2026 – § 23/2 Part voted on: “those words”Roll call404 for, 131 against, 64 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Patriots; split: Patriots
52Amendment 20, adding text after recital F RC-B10-0143/2026 – After recital F – Am 20 Roll call263 for, 273 against, 50 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
53Separate vote on recital G Show of hands Rejected
54Vote on text inserted after recital J Show of hands Rejected
55Final vote — text as a whole RC-B10-0143/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call437 for, 82 against, 70 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: EPP
56Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0143/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
57Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0144/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
58Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0145/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
59Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0146/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
60Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0147/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
61Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0148/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
62Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0149/2026 Show of hands Lapsed

Roll calls requested by The Left, EPP, ECR, Patriots · split votes by The Left (4), EPP, ECR (7), Patriots (4).

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-10-2026-0143

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on Russia's war against Ukraine, covering humanitarian, security, and EU accession issues.

The text condemns Russia's aggression, demands withdrawal, and supports Ukraine's sovereignty and EU integration.

It calls for more humanitarian aid and a European-led security strategy, urging member states to act.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament condemns Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and demands immediate withdrawal of all forces and compensation for damage.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2026/2599(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject

Four years of Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine

Parliament adopted the text on 24 February 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 3 steps of the dossier
  1. Tabled for plenary (done)
  2. Plenary vote · Adopted 24 February 2026 (done)
  3. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 17 connections: Running issue: Russia's war against Ukraine · Running issue: Humanitarian crises · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: Russia's war against Ukraine

Running issue: Humanitarian crises

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine”. Decision, 24 February 2026. votingId 185885, document B-10-2026-0143, reference 2026/2599(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-02-24/1 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 24 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-24-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 24 February 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-24-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-24, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-02-24/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-02-24-1,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-02-24},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-02-24/1}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-02-24/1},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 185885, document B-10-2026-0143, reference 2026/2599(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-24-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-02-24-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-02-24 (CC BY 4.0)}
}