Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Decision

The cases of human rights and environmental defenders Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia

Effect
Adopted
Result
469 for · 38 against · 62 abstained roll call
Date
21 May 2026, 13:37
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by an overwhelming majority
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0253
Dossier
2026/2738(RSP)
Source
Motion for a resolution
Topics
Foreign affairs Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
8 votes · 2 roll calls · 1 amendment
Requested by
Renew (1 roll call) · ESN (1 roll call)
Sitting
Thursday 21 May 2026
Final vote
193395
More
Cite this page Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page
Votes on this decision
Members on the final vote

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 469 for, 38 against, 62 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by an overwhelming majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected). 6 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Backed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by Patriots; ESN mostly abstained.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 45Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 43Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 104Against 0Abst. 0No vote 32 of 136Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 65Against 0Abst. 0No vote 12 of 77Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 136Against 1Abst. 0No vote 46 of 183Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 57Against 3Abst. 7No vote 14 of 81Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.78
PatriotsFor 14Against 33Abst. 23No vote 15 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.21
ESNFor 3Against 0Abst. 21No vote 3 of 27Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.81
No groupFor 9Against 1Abst. 11No vote 9 of 30Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Nikola BARTŮŠEK changed group, Pina PICIERNO changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 14

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria130610.53
Belgium150340.75
Bulgaria80270.70
Cyprus0006—
Czechia150240.82
Germany64121100.62
Denmark131100.80
Estonia5002—
Spain4301160.97
Finland100051.00
France38274120.33
Greece623100.32
Croatia100021.00
Hungary50113—
Ireland130011.00
Italy5207170.82
Lithuania9002—
Luxembourg5001—
Latvia8001—
Malta1005—
Netherlands216040.67
Poland451340.88
Portugal170130.92
Romania2300101.00
Sweden170310.78
Slovenia7002—
Slovakia60450.40

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 569 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberts ZĪLE LatviaECRSpeeches321 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Tomasz FROELICH GermanyESNSpeeches120 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Idoia MENDIA SpainS&DSpeeches120 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Małgorzata GOSIEWSKA PolandECRSpeeches120 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Roxana MÎNZATU RomaniaS&DSpeeches120 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Not in office
Catarina VIEIRA NetherlandsGreensSpeeches120 May 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For

All votes on this decision, 8

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 1 to paragraph 6 RC-B10-0248/2026 – § 6 – Am 1 Roll call87 for, 415 against, 65 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
2Final vote — text as a whole RC-B10-0248/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call469 for, 38 against, 62 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew
3Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0248/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
Show the other 7 votesShow the other 5 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Final vote — text as a whole RC-B10-0248/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call469 for, 38 against, 62 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew
3Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0248/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0250/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
5Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0253/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
6Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0256/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
7Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0257/2026 Show of hands Lapsed
8Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0264/2026 Show of hands Lapsed

Roll calls requested by Renew, ESN.

Text

The text voted on.

Motion B-10-2026-0253

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted a resolution on the cases of Indonesian human rights defender Andrie Yunus and environmental activist Muhammad Rosidi, who were attacked with acid.

It strongly condemns the attacks and calls on Indonesian authorities to investigate, prosecute those responsible, and protect the victims and their families.

The resolution also notes Indonesia's efforts on human rights, welcomes progress on sexual offences, and encourages stronger anti-corruption measures.

Parliament asks for the resolution to be forwarded to EU institutions and Indonesian authorities.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution condemns acid attacks on human rights defender Andrie Yunus and environmental activist Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia, and calls for thorough investigations and protection for victims.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2026/2738(RSP) · Resolution on a topical subject

Parliament adopted the text on 21 May 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 3 steps of the dossier
  1. Tabled for plenary (done)
  2. Plenary vote · Adopted 21 May 2026 (done)
  3. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

No connections found for this decision.

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-21/7
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “The cases of human rights and environmental defenders Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia”. Decision, 21 May 2026. votingId 193395, document B-10-2026-0253, reference 2026/2738(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-21/7 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 21 May 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-05-21/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-decision-2026-05-21-7,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{The cases of human rights and environmental defenders Andrie Yunus and Muhammad Rosidi in Indonesia}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-05-21},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-21/7}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-05-21/7},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 193395, document B-10-2026-0253, reference 2026/2738(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-05-21-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-05-21 (CC BY 4.0)}
}