Skip to content

Decision

Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025

Effect
Adopted
Result
316 for · 281 against · 39 abstained roll call
Date
7 July 2026, 13:37–13:42
Kind
Resolution
More facts (9)
Margin
by a small majority
Source
Committee report by Joachim Streit
Topics
EU budget & fundsEconomy & single market Assigned by a model, not checked by hand.
Votes
17 votes · 14 roll calls · 13 amendments
Requested by
The Left (1 roll call) · S&D (1 split vote) · Renew (1 roll call) · ECR (1 roll call) · ESN (1 roll call)
Final vote
194951
More

Result

The final vote and what it means for this kind of decision.

Final vote: 316 for, 281 against, 39 abstained (roll call).

Adopted by a small majority.

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 13 amendments (4 adopted, 9 rejected) and 3 parts of the text voted on separately (1 adopted, 2 rejected).

Backed by Renew, EPP and ECR; opposed by The Left, Greens, S&D, Patriots and ESN.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 23Abst. 7No vote 15 of 45Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.65
GreensFor 2Against 47Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
S&DFor 4Against 120Abst. 1No vote 10 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
RenewFor 70Against 1Abst. 0No vote 7 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 167Against 0Abst. 0No vote 18 of 185Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 54Against 11Abst. 6No vote 11 of 82Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.64
PatriotsFor 15Against 41Abst. 17No vote 12 of 85Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.34
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 4Against 15Abst. 8No vote 2 of 29Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Members who changed group are counted in the group of the day: Branko GRIMS changed group, Elena YONCHEVA changed group, Taner KABILOV changed group.

Voted against their group, 32

Members who voted otherwise than a clear line (at least two thirds of the votes cast, at least 10 members voting) of the group they sat in that day. A group without a clear line is divided and not counted.

Countries

The final vote by national delegation.

Votes by country (27 delegations)
Members' votes by country. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Cohesion: Agreement Index of the delegation, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all the same; it reflects the mix of groups (method).
CountryForAgainstAbst.No voteCohesion
Austria612020.50
Belgium1010110.21
Bulgaria75050.38
Cyprus3210—
Czechia134130.58
Germany3650370.34
Denmark93120.54
Estonia3301—
Spain2229090.35
Finland66120.19
France19440180.55
Greece710220.29
Croatia65010.32
Hungary631020.29
Ireland111110.77
Italy32295100.23
Lithuania83000.59
Luxembourg3300—
Latvia7101—
Malta2301—
Netherlands1610320.33
Poland3813020.62
Portugal79050.34
Romania199140.48
Sweden88500.07
Slovenia7200—
Slovakia54420.08

Members

Each member’s recorded position on the final roll call, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 636 members

Debate speakers and how they voted

Members who spoke in the plenary debate on the dossier. Speeches: how many times they took the floor. Final vote: their recorded position on this decision's final roll call.
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Roberta METSOLA MaltaEPPSpeeches17 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) No vote recorded
Jorge BUXADÉ VILLALBA SpainPatriotsSpeeches17 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Alexander JUNGBLUTH GermanyESNSpeeches36 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Joachim STREIT GermanyRenewSpeeches26 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Lukas SIEPER changed group GermanyRenewSpeeches26 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Maria GRAPINI RomaniaS&DSpeeches16 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained
Show the other 14 speakers
Debate speakers, continued
MemberGroupSpeechesSpokeFinal vote
Javi LÓPEZ SpainS&DSpeeches16 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Marc BOTENGA BelgiumThe LeftSpeeches16 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Karlo RESSLER CroatiaEPPSpeeches16 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group For
Damian BOESELAGER GermanyGreensSpeeches16 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Ewa KOPACZ PolandEPPSpeeches16 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Ondřej KNOTEK CzechiaPatriotsSpeeches16 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Georgios AFTIAS GreeceEPPSpeeches16 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Angéline FURET FrancePatriotsSpeeches16 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Mireia BORRÁS PABÓN SpainPatriotsSpeeches16 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Marta WCISŁO PolandEPPSpeeches16 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) For
Carla TAVARES PortugalS&DSpeeches16 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
João OLIVEIRA PortugalThe LeftSpeeches16 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Against
Rada LAYKOVA BulgariaESNSpeeches16 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) · for the group Against
Enikő GYŐRI HungaryPatriotsSpeeches16 Jul 2026 (verbatim report, official site) Abstained

All votes on this decision, 17

In voting order. Result: for–against–abstained (a show of hands has no count). Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call, a split vote or a separate vote.
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
1Amendment 3, adding text before paragraph 1 — part 1 A10-0170/2026 – Joachim Streit – Before § 1 – Am 3/1 Part voted on: ‘Takes the view that the European Investment Bank’s primary objectives should be the promotion of economic, social and territorial cohesion, and that its funding should be directed, as a matter of priority, towards public investment and projects that meet the needs of the people and the development priorities laid down by each Member State, including support for the productive economy, micro, small and medium-sized enterprises, the promotion of full employment and the creation of jobs with rights, the strengthening and modernisation of public services – particularly in the health, education and transport sectors – support for and promotion of social facilities such as crèches, care homes and support infrastructure for people with disabilities, public housing, as well as the promotion of Member States’ energy sovereignty;’Roll call215 for, 346 against, 98 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left; split: S&D
2Amendment 3, adding text before paragraph 1 — part 2 A10-0170/2026 – Joachim Streit – Before § 1 – Am 3/2 Part voted on: ‘takes the view, to that end, that the EIB’s activities must not be subordinated to the logic of so-called ‘competitiveness’ and the transfer and concentration of resources towards economic conglomerates, nor must they be diverted towards the financing of militarisation;’Roll call78 for, 544 against, 32 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left; split: S&D
3Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 5 A10-0170/2026 – Joachim Streit – After § 5 – Am 11 Roll call116 for, 502 against, 38 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
Show the other 16 votesShow the other 14 votes
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
2Amendment 3, adding text before paragraph 1 — part 2 A10-0170/2026 – Joachim Streit – Before § 1 – Am 3/2 Part voted on: ‘takes the view, to that end, that the EIB’s activities must not be subordinated to the logic of so-called ‘competitiveness’ and the transfer and concentration of resources towards economic conglomerates, nor must they be diverted towards the financing of militarisation;’Roll call78 for, 544 against, 32 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left; split: S&D
3Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 5 A10-0170/2026 – Joachim Streit – After § 5 – Am 11 Roll call116 for, 502 against, 38 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
Votes on this decision, continued
No.VoteRecordedResultRequested by
4Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 6 A10-0170/2026 – Joachim Streit – After § 6 – Am 12 Roll call139 for, 498 against, 18 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
5Amendment 4 to paragraph 8 A10-0170/2026 – Joachim Streit – § 8 – Am 4 Roll call170 for, 450 against, 38 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
6Amendment 6 to paragraph 12 A10-0170/2026 – Joachim Streit – § 12 – Am 6 Roll call396 for, 242 against, 15 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
7Separate vote on paragraph 12 Show of hands Rejected
8Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 13 A10-0170/2026 – Joachim Streit – After § 13 – Am 7 Roll call202 for, 426 against, 26 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
9Amendment 8 to paragraph 15 A10-0170/2026 – Joachim Streit – § 15 – Am 8 Roll call372 for, 274 against, 15 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
10Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 19 A10-0170/2026 – Joachim Streit – After § 19 – Am 5 Roll call82 for, 542 against, 33 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: The Left
11Separate vote on paragraph 20 Show of hands Rejected
12Amendment 9 to paragraph 21 A10-0170/2026 – Joachim Streit – § 21 – Am 9 Roll call248 for, 398 against, 12 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ECR
13Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 21 A10-0170/2026 – Joachim Streit – After § 21 – Am 13 Roll call139 for, 462 against, 48 abstained RejectedRequested byroll call: ESN
14Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 25 A10-0170/2026 – Joachim Streit – After § 25 – Am 1 Roll call341 for, 252 against, 54 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: Renew
15Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 25 A10-0170/2026 – Joachim Streit – After § 25 – Am 10 Roll call357 for, 265 against, 15 abstained AdoptedRequested byroll call: ECR
16Vote on text inserted after paragraph 34 Counted385 for, 241 against, 19 abstained Adopted
17Final vote — text as a whole A10-0170/2026 – Joachim Streit – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) Roll call316 for, 281 against, 39 abstained Adopted

Roll calls requested by The Left, Renew, ECR, ESN · split votes by S&D.

Text

The text voted on.

Report A-10-2026-0170

AI: What this vote decides Written by AI from the official text — check the source

Parliament adopted its annual report on the European Investment Bank Group's financial activities, setting out its position on the bank's priorities and operations.

The report welcomes the EIB's strategic roadmap for 2024-2027 and calls for greater investment in competitiveness, defence, and other EU priorities.

It also stresses the need to preserve the EIB's AAA credit rating and to ensure public scrutiny and accountability.

Read the text · Report a problem

AI: The text in short Written by AI from the official text — check the source

This resolution assesses the European Investment Bank Group's 2025 activities, welcoming its record investment and alignment with EU priorities, while calling for more support for competitiveness, defence, SMEs, and transparency.

Read the text · Report a problem

Dossier

Where the dossier stands and its other decisions in plenary.

2025/2213(INI) · Own-initiative report

Parliament adopted the text on 7 July 2026. This is its final position on the matter.

Show the 5 steps of the dossier
  1. Referred to committee · 13 November 2025 (done)
  2. Committee work · Report adopted 3 June 2026 (done)
  3. Tabled for plenary · 11 June 2026 (done)
  4. Plenary vote · Adopted 7 July 2026 (done)
  5. Parliament’s position · Final (done)

Lead committee: BUDG · Author: Joachim STREIT (Renew)

Connections

What this decision touches: the procedural chain, the same text, running issues, votes that split the chamber the same way.

Show 19 connections: Running issue: European Investment Bank oversight · Running issue: EU competitiveness · Other decisions of the part-session on BUDG dossiers · Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Running issue: European Investment Bank oversight

Running issue: EU competitiveness

Other decisions of the part-session on BUDG dossiers

See all: Other decisions of the part-session on BUDG dossiers

Final votes that split the chamber the same way

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025”. Decision, 7 July 2026. votingId 194951, document A-10-2026-0170, reference 2025/2213(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-07-07/10 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 7 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 7 July 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-07, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-07-07/decisions?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-decision-2026-07-07-10,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Financial activities of the European Investment Bank Group – annual report 2025}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-07-07},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-07-07/10}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/decisions/2026-07-07/10},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Decision. votingId 194951, document A-10-2026-0170, reference 2025/2213(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-07-07-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: decisions of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-07-07 (CC BY 4.0)}
}