Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Members compared

All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted

How often did these members vote the same way — against the usual agreement between their groups — and on which votes did they differ?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes620All roll calls5 928
Abstentions Count as a positionIgnore (for and against only) ⓘ

Members compared

Two to six members. Search by name and tick the ones to add, or tick members in the member register and choose Compare.

The members, 3

Group now (or on the last day in office); ⇄ marks a change of group during the term.

Agreement, pair by pair, 3

Each pair: of the votes both cast a position in, the share where they voted the same way.

Agreement: same position ÷ shared votes (for, against and abstained); a count below 50 shared votes. Shared votes: votes where both recorded a position. Baseline: the median agreement of all pairs of members of the groups the two sat in on the shared votes — groups at the date; when one changed group, each combination weighted by the votes shared in it.
MembersAgreementSame positionShared votesBaseline
Barry ANDREWS and Manfred WEBER81.1 %3 2664 02581.6 %
Barry ANDREWS and Jordan BARDELLA26.5 %1 1084 18429.2 %
Manfred WEBER and Jordan BARDELLA34.1 %1 3413 93337.1 %

Where they differed, 3 683

Votes where the members did not all cast the same position, newest first. “No vote” is a vote they did not record — not necessarily an absence.

Each member’s recorded position: For, Against, Abstained, No vote recorded, or Not in office on that day.
VoteBarry ANDREWSManfred WEBERJordan BARDELLA
17 Sept 2026 Final vote — text as a whole The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 16, adding text after recital G The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Recital F — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 72, adding text after recital B The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 14 — part 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 13 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Paragraph 13 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 36 to paragraph 12 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 52 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 68 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Paragraph 10 — part 3 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Paragraph 10 — part 2 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 50, adding text after paragraph 8 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 48 to paragraph 8 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 66, adding text after paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 30 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 29 to paragraph 6 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAgainstForNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 5 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 23 to paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 63 to paragraph 4 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 1 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 13 to recital C — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAgainstForNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 13 to recital C — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAgainstForNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAgainstForNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 14 to paragraph 2 — part 1 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAgainstForNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 1 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersAgainstForNo vote recorded
17 Sept 2026 Paragraph 13 — part 2 Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-upForAgainstNo vote recorded
16 Sept 2026 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified soybean MON 94313AgainstNo vote recordedFor
16 Sept 2026 Final vote on the motion for a resolution Genetically modified soybean GMB151 x DAS-44406-6AgainstNo vote recordedFor
16 Sept 2026 Separate vote on citation 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForNo vote recordedAbstained
16 Sept 2026 Separate vote on citation 9 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForNo vote recordedAbstained
16 Sept 2026 Recital AC — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForNo vote recordedAgainst
16 Sept 2026 Separate vote on recital AB Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForNo vote recordedAbstained
16 Sept 2026 Separate vote on recital AA Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForNo vote recordedAbstained
16 Sept 2026 Recital J — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForNo vote recordedAgainst
16 Sept 2026 Recital B — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForNo vote recordedAgainst
16 Sept 2026 Recital B — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForNo vote recordedAbstained
16 Sept 2026 Paragraph 63 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForNo vote recordedAgainst
16 Sept 2026 Paragraph 63 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForNo vote recordedAbstained
16 Sept 2026 Paragraph 63 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForForAbstained
16 Sept 2026 Paragraph 62 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAgainstFor

Show all 50 votes on this page

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 5 928 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 174 of 794 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Agreement between two members v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-25
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-25 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-25,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Members compared — All roll calls · whole term, 16 Jul 2024 – 25 Sept 2026 · Barry ANDREWS, Manfred WEBER, Jordan BARDELLA · abstentions counted}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-25}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/members?ids=204332%2C28229%2C131580&scope=all&to=2026-09-25},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}