Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Analysis

Votes against the group’s line

All roll calls · 26 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Ana Miguel PEDRO

Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?

Cite
Export
Period Term202420252026Last 6 months
Custom dates
Votes Final votes185All roll calls1 752
Order Highest rate firstBy name

Showing Ana Miguel PEDRO only. Show every member

Ana Miguel PEDRO’s votes against the line, 74

Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.

Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
17 Sept 2026Amendment 10 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstEPP
17 Sept 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersForAgainstEPP
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleAbstainedForEPP
17 Sept 2026Recital AD — part 2 Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleAbstainedForEPP
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 85 — part 2 Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleAbstainedForEPP
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 63 — part 3 Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleAbstainedForEPP
17 Sept 2026Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 55 An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sectorForAgainstEPP
17 Sept 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 1 An EU health workforce crisis plan: sustainability of healthcare systems and employment and working conditions in the healthcare sectorForAgainstEPP
16 Sept 2026Recital B — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedForEPP
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 63 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedForEPP
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 48 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedAgainstEPP
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 48 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedForEPP
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 46 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstForEPP
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 46 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedForEPP
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 45 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedForEPP
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 21 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstForEPP
16 Sept 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsForAbstainedEPP
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 18 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstForEPP
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 8 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAbstainedForEPP
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 3 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstForEPP
16 Sept 2026Paragraph 3 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditionsAgainstForEPP
16 Sept 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 64 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureForAgainstEPP
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 83 — part 3 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAbstainedForEPP
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 83 — part 2 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAbstainedForEPP
15 Sept 2026Paragraph 83 — part 1 Implementation of the Council Recommendation on a Bridge to Jobs – Reinforcing the Youth GuaranteeAbstainedForEPP
15 Sept 2026Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 115 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAbstainedAgainstEPP
15 Sept 2026Amendment 86 to paragraph 115 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldForAgainstEPP
15 Sept 2026Amendment 51 to paragraph 80 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldForAgainstEPP
15 Sept 2026Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 79 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAbstainedAgainstEPP
15 Sept 2026Amendment 36, adding text after paragraph 29 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldForAgainstEPP
15 Sept 2026Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 5 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAgainstForEPP
15 Sept 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 10 Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditureForAgainstEPP
15 Sept 2026Separate vote on paragraph 10 Draft amending budget No 2/2026: update of revenue (own resources) and adjustments to expenditureAbstainedForEPP
15 Sept 2026Amendment 98 to recital 3 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresForAgainstEPP
8 Jul 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution Lead in certain fishing tackleForAgainstEPP
17 Jun 2026Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 35 2025 Commission report on Bosnia and HerzegovinaAbstainedAgainstEPP
17 Jun 2026Amendment 7 to paragraph 2 2025 Commission report on North MacedoniaForAgainstEPP
17 Jun 2026Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 27 2025 Commission report on MontenegroForAgainstEPP
17 Jun 2026Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 48 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeAbstainedAgainstEPP
17 Jun 2026Amendment 40, adding text after paragraph 46 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeAbstainedAgainstEPP
17 Jun 2026Amendment 30 to paragraph 40 2025 Commission report on TürkiyeForAgainstEPP
17 Jun 2026Final vote General arrangements for excise duty applied to tobacco and tobacco related productsAgainstForEPP
21 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAbstainedForEPP
21 May 2026Recital R — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapAgainstForEPP
21 May 2026Amendment 34 to paragraph 18 The multiannual plan for the Baltic Sea and ways forwardForAgainstEPP
21 May 2026Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 Repression and execution of protesters, dissidents, political prisoners and religious minorities in IranForAgainstEPP
20 May 2026Final vote — text as a whole Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedForEPP
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point al — part 5 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAgainstForEPP
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point m — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAbstainedForEPP
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAgainstForEPP
Show all 74 votes
Position: the member’s vote. Clear line: the position of at least two thirds of Group (at least 10 members voting), the group they sat in on that day.
DateVotePositionClear lineGroup
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 112 — part 1 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportAgainstForEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 105 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 67 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AgainstForEPP
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 61 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedForEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 53 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 69, adding text after paragraph 49 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 40 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 62, adding text after paragraph 12 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025ForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 3 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025AbstainedAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 26 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European External Action ServiceAbstainedAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAbstainedForEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 2 to paragraph 30 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Amendment 46 to paragraph 80 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European ParliamentForAgainstEPP
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 56 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAgainstForEPP
28 Apr 2026Amendment 3, adding text after Recital B — part 2 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024AgainstForEPP
28 Apr 2026Amendment 60, adding text after paragraph 32 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024AgainstForEPP
28 Apr 2026Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 25 — part 2 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024AgainstForEPP
28 Apr 2026Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 25 — part 2 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024AgainstForEPP
28 Apr 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 25 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024AgainstForEPP
28 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUForAgainstEPP
28 Apr 2026Recital AJ — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUAbstainedForEPP
28 Apr 2026Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 34 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIForAgainstEPP
28 Apr 2026Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 10 Guidelines for the 2027 budget - Section IIIAbstainedAgainstEPP
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 115 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034AbstainedForEPP

By member, 1

Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.

Against the line: votes against the group’s clear line ÷ clear-line votes (votes where the member’s group at the date had a clear line and the member voted); a count below 50. Of the votes against: opposite (for ↔ against), abstained against the line, other (for or against when the line was to abstain), and with own party — with the majority of their national party’s members in the group (at least two voting).
MemberAgainst the lineClear-line votesOppositeAbstainedOtherWith own party
Ana Miguel PEDRO , EPP · Portugal 4.9 %1 510423110

About these figures

What was counted, what was left out, and how.

  • 1 752 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
  • 62 of 247 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
  • A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
  • Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
  • Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
  • Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
  • Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
  • Data as of 25 Sept 2026, 03:36 UTC (data stamp f37e5638cded, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Export
Cite

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=110673&scope=all&to=2026-09-26
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Data version
data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
Retrieved
26 September 2026

Cite as

EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 26 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Ana Miguel PEDRO”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=110673&scope=all&to=2026-09-26 (retrieved 26 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-26,
  author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
  title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 26 Mar 2026 – 26 Sept 2026 · Ana Miguel PEDRO}},
  year = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=110673&scope=all&to=2026-09-26}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-03-26&mep=110673&scope=all&to=2026-09-26},
  urldate = {2026-09-26},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version f37e5638cded (25 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}