Analysis
Votes against the group’s line
All roll calls · 1 Jan 2026 – 29 Sept 2026 · Ivaylo VALCHEV
Which members voted against their group’s clear line, how often compared with the votes where the group had one, and did they vote with their national party when they did?
Showing Ivaylo VALCHEV only. Show every member
Ivaylo VALCHEV’s votes against the line, 84
Every vote in the selection where the member’s position differed from their group’s clear line, newest first.
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 85 — part 2 Impact of social media and the online environment on young people | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 17 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 85 — part 1 Impact of social media and the online environment on young people | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Separate vote on citation 19 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Separate vote on citation 9 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Separate vote on recital AB Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Separate vote on recital AA Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Separate vote on recital Z Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 63 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 44 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 43 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 43 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 41 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 8 — part 3 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 8 — part 2 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 16 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 8 — part 1 Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions | For | Abstained | ECR |
| 15 Sept 2026 | Paragraph 50 — part 2 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy Shield | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 9 Jul 2026 | Amendment 6 to paragraph 7 — part 2 Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacre | Against | For | ECR |
| 8 Jul 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on Ukraine | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 7 Jul 2026 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 6 A new strategy for media literacy and digital learning | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 18 Jun 2026 | Recital G — part 2 Russia’s unacceptable provocative actions and drone incursions into Romania, the Baltic states and Finland | Against | For | ECR |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole 2025 Commission report on North Macedonia | For | Abstained | ECR |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Amendment 49, adding text after paragraph 43 2025 Commission report on Türkiye | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 17 Jun 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 42 2025 Commission report on Türkiye | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 21 May 2026 | Separate vote on recital AC Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 21 May 2026 | Recital R — part 2 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 21 May 2026 | Recital R — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 21 May 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 79 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 21 May 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 64 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 21 May 2026 | Paragraph 49 — part 1 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap | For | Against | ECR |
| 21 May 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 43 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gap | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Separate vote on citation 25 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU response | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Paragraph 1, point al — part 5 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | For | Against | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Paragraph 1, point al — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | For | Against | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Paragraph 1, point al — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | For | Against | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 6 to paragraph 1, after point l Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 20 May 2026 | Amendment 47 to paragraph 1, after point i Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General Assembly | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 117 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law report | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Separate vote on recital AO Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Separate vote on recital AL Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 10, adding text after recital G Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 86 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 71 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 70 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 70 — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Amendment 56, adding text after paragraph 59 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025 | Against | For | ECR |
| 29 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 138 — part 1 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – European Parliament | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Recital AP — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Recital AJ — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Recital AC — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 28 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU | Abstained | Against | ECR |
Show all 84 votes
| Date | Vote | Position | Clear line | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Apr 2026 | Paragraph 19 — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU | For | Against | ECR |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 5 to paragraph 16 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 7 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EU | For | Against | ECR |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Separate vote on paragraph 54 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 28 Apr 2026 | Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 36 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034 | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 11 Mar 2026 | Paragraph 10 — part 2 Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectors | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 10 Mar 2026 | Separate vote on citation 47 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 10 Mar 2026 | Proposal to vote on amendments Harmonising certain aspects of insolvency law | Against | For | ECR |
| 24 Feb 2026 | Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 14 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine | Against | Abstained | ECR |
| 24 Feb 2026 | Paragraph 6 — part 2 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 24 Feb 2026 | Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 5 Four years of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and European contributions to a just peace and sustained security for Ukraine | For | Against | ECR |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Recital M — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Recital M — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Recital M — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Paragraph 1, point x — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Paragraph 1, point v — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Paragraph 1, point u — part 7 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Paragraph 1, point u — part 6 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Paragraph 1, point u — part 5 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Paragraph 1, point u — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Paragraph 1, point u — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Paragraph 1, point u — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Paragraph 1, point u — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Paragraph 1, point r — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Recital O — part 1 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 12 Feb 2026 | Paragraph 4 — part 1 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategy | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Final vote — text as a whole Interim report in view of the consent procedure on the Agreement establishing an association between the EU and the Principality of Andorra and the Republic of San Marino | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 11 Feb 2026 | Final vote Amending the multiannual financial framework for the years 2021 to 2027 | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 10 Feb 2026 | Paragraph 35 — part 2 European Central Bank – annual report 2025 | For | Against | ECR |
| 10 Feb 2026 | Amendment 39 to paragraph 35 European Central Bank – annual report 2025 | Against | For | ECR |
| 21 Jan 2026 | Paragraph 17 — part 4 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025 | Abstained | Against | ECR |
| 21 Jan 2026 | Paragraph 17 — part 3 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2025 | For | Against | ECR |
| 21 Jan 2026 | Final vote Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of a Loan for Ukraine | Abstained | For | ECR |
| 20 Jan 2026 | Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 10 Just transition directive in the world of work: ensuring the creation of jobs and revitalising local economies | Abstained | For | ECR |
By member, 1
Members with at least one vote where their group had a clear line. Order: by rate, for members with at least 300 clear-line votes (the rest follow by name) — not a ranking.
| Member | Against the line | Clear-line votes | Opposite | Abstained | Other | With own party |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ivaylo VALCHEV , ECR · Bulgaria | 4.0 % | 2 125 | 14 | 67 | 3 | 0 |
About these figures
What was counted, what was left out, and how.
- 2 521 votes considered (all roll-call votes matching the filters; scope).
- 81 of 342 decisions in the period had no final vote recorded by name (a show of hands or a count without names) and cannot be measured.
- A vote counts against the group’s line when the group’s clear line — at least two thirds of its votes cast, with at least 10 members voting — was different from the member’s position; a divided group has no line to vote against (method). This is a different rule from group loyalty, which uses the majority line (loyalty).
- Ordered by rate, only members with at least 300 votes where their group had a clear line are compared; fewer votes make a rate unstable, and below 50 the figure is shown as a count.
- Each member is counted in the group they belonged to on the day of the vote (group at the date).
- Roll calls are not a random sample: final votes on laws are recorded by name, most other roll calls because a group asked for it. A group’s line is inferred from its members’ votes; the Parliament publishes no whip.
- Methods: Voted against the group’s clear line v1, Voted with the group’s majority line v1, Final votes and all roll calls v1, Group at the date of the vote v1.
- Data as of 29 Sept 2026, 03:29 UTC (data stamp 2b7a29b98b0d, code 6d4005c55bde; what the stamp is).
Sources & citation
Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.
- Permalink
- https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-01-01&mep=257258&to=2026-12-31
- Data source
- Licensed CC BY 4.0.
- Data version
- data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1 · methods
- Retrieved
- 29 September 2026
Cite as
EU Parl Watch Research (2026). “Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2026 – 29 Sept 2026 · Ivaylo VALCHEV”. Analysis. EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-01-01&mep=257258&to=2026-12-31 (retrieved 29 September 2026). Data: European Parliament Open Data, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/ (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1.
BibTeX
@misc{epw-analysis-2026-09-29,
author = {{EU Parl Watch Research}},
title = {{Votes against the group’s line — All roll calls · 1 Jan 2026 – 29 Sept 2026 · Ivaylo VALCHEV}},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-01-01&mep=257258&to=2026-12-31}},
url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/analysis/dissent?from=2026-01-01&mep=257258&to=2026-12-31},
urldate = {2026-09-29},
publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
note = {Analysis. Data: European Parliament Open Data (CC BY 4.0); data version 2b7a29b98b0d (29 Sept 2026) · methods: group-at-date v1, participation v1, abstention v1, loyalty v1, against-clear v1, cohesion v1, agreement v1, group-agreement v1, winning-side v1, similar-votes v1, scope v1, data-version v1}
}