Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 5 — part 2

Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up

Vote
Paragraph 5 — part 2
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
479 for · 124 against · 8 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:28
More facts (6)
Position
vote 14 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
split vote: Greens
Official label
B10-0386/2026 – § 5/2
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0388
Dossier
2026/2778(RSP)
Vote id
196827
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 479 for, 124 against, 8 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 78 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “and renewal”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 34Abst. 1No vote 7 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
GreensFor 5Against 44Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.85
S&DFor 101Against 11Abst. 1No vote 22 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.84
RenewFor 63Against 3Abst. 0No vote 12 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 155Against 0Abst. 0No vote 29 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ECRFor 47Against 27Abst. 0No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.45
PatriotsFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 22Against 1Abst. 2No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.82
No groupFor 15Against 4Abst. 4No vote 5 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium100
Bulgaria200
Cyprus100
Czechia200
Denmark100
Estonia100
Spain200
Finland010
France400
Greece200
Croatia100
Italy0220
Lithuania200
Latvia200
Netherlands300
Poland1710
Romania600
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 611 members

No vote recorded, 106

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 106 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Final vote on the motion for a resolution The role of social, economic and environmental standards in safeguarding fair competition for all aquatic food products and improving food securityFinal467 for, 92 against, 44 abstained Adopted For 77 %r · shared0.70 597 voters
18 Dec 2025Final vote — text as a whole Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gearFinal450 for, 93 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 78 %r · shared0.70 504 voters
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the ECR Group — Attack against citizens in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the ECR Group – Attack against citizens in ModenaOther355 for, 86 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 79 %r · shared0.69 395 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Mar 2026Final vote Calculation of emission credits for heavy-duty vehicles for the reporting periods of the years 2025 to 2029Final473 for, 81 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 84 %r · shared0.69 488 voters
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 5 — part 2 Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officersSplit vote512 for, 86 against, 8 abstained Adopted For 84 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.69 601 voters
10 Jul 2025Final vote Amending Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 as regards obligations of economic operators concerning battery due diligence policiesFinal542 for, 97 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 83 %r · shared0.68 552 voters
11 Feb 2025Separate vote on paragraph 25 European Central Bank – annual report 2024Separate vote489 for, 114 against, 37 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.68 541 voters
13 Nov 2025Amendments 116 + 117 + 316 + 1 (voted as one) to Article 4 Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsAmendment536 for, 100 against, 9 abstained Adopted For 83 %Requested by ESN, ECRr · shared0.67 548 voters
17 Dec 2024Final vote on the provisional agreement Deforestation Regulation: provisions relating to the date of applicationFinal546 for, 97 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 84 %r · shared0.66 550 voters
8 May 2025Final vote CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027Final458 for, 101 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 80 %r · shared0.66 493 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196827
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 5 — part 2 — Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 196827, reference 2026/2778(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196827 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-196827,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 5 — part 2 — Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196827}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196827},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196827, reference 2026/2778(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}