Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 4 to paragraph 2

Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up

Vote
Amendment 4 to paragraph 2
Decision
No. 7 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
128 for · 469 against · 14 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:27
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 27 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: The Left
Official label
B10-0386/2026 – § 2 – Am 4
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0388
Dossier
2026/2778(RSP)
Vote id
196815
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 128 for, 469 against, 14 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 21 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 36Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 46Against 3Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.91
S&DFor 31Against 82Abst. 0No vote 22 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.59
RenewFor 2Against 64Abst. 0No vote 12 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.95
EPPFor 1Against 155Abst. 0No vote 28 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.99
ECRFor 1Against 68Abst. 5No vote 10 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 0Against 69Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 1Against 24Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
No groupFor 10Against 4Abst. 9No vote 5 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Renew members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria020
Belgium030
Bulgaria020
Germany060
Denmark130
Estonia010
Spain010
Finland030
France0120
Ireland120
Italy020
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Netherlands070
Poland010
Portugal020
Romania020
Sweden030
Slovenia020
Slovakia060

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 611 members

No vote recorded, 106

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 106 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Proposal to reject the text Certain corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsRejection105 for, 529 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 16 %r · shared0.80 542 voters
16 Dec 2025Proposal to reject the text Corporate sustainability reporting and due diligence requirementsRejection117 for, 540 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 18 %r · shared0.79 560 voters
8 May 2025Amendment 16 to paragraph 29 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal marketAmendment100 for, 306 against, 71 abstained Rejected For 21 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.78 415 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 23 Continued financial and military support to Ukraine by EU Member StatesAmendment104 for, 485 against, 30 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 527 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 87 to paragraph 52 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment106 for, 489 against, 18 abstained Rejected For 17 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.77 523 voters
21 May 2025Request by The Left Group Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by The Left GroupOther102 for, 378 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 21 %r · shared0.77 425 voters
19 Sept 2024Amendment 1, adding text after recital D The case of José Daniel Ferrier García in CubaAmendment112 for, 485 against, 13 abstained Rejected For 18 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 522 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 1 to paragraph 20 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and CouncilAmendment105 for, 430 against, 130 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 561 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 24 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingAmendment98 for, 513 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 16 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.77 523 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 65 to paragraph 7 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment91 for, 503 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 15 %Requested by The Leftr · shared0.76 597 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196815
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 4 to paragraph 2 — Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 196815, reference 2026/2778(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196815 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-196815,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 4 to paragraph 2 — Evaluation of the Common Fisheries Policy and follow-up}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196815}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196815},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196815, reference 2026/2778(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}