Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 12, after paragraph 22

Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers

Vote
Amendment 12, after paragraph 22
Decision
No. 8 of the sitting of 17 Sept 2026
Result
186 for · 408 against · 18 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:33
More facts (6)
Position
vote 15 of 21 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
B10-0390/2026 – After § 22 – Am 12
Text
Motion B-10-2026-0390
Dossier
2026/2797(RSP)
Vote id
196790
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 186 for, 408 against, 18 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 35Abst. 0No vote 9 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 101Abst. 14No vote 20 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
RenewFor 1Against 66Abst. 0No vote 11 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 3Against 152Abst. 1No vote 28 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
ECRFor 73Against 0Abst. 1No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 15Against 5Abst. 2No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium300
Czechia500
Denmark100
Spain600
France2600
Greece100
Hungary700
Italy500
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Poland200
Portugal100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 612 members

No vote recorded, 105

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 105 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
15 Sept 2026Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 56 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment201 for, 453 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %r · shared0.97 581 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.97 577 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 17 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment188 for, 457 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.97 556 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment201 for, 438 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 559 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 37 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment176 for, 431 against, 1 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 515 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 3, adding text after recital A European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 461 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 577 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 14 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment203 for, 442 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.96 555 voters
10 Mar 2026Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 32 Public access to documents - report 2022 - 2024Amendment178 for, 435 against, 0 abstained Rejected For 29 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 520 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 71, adding text after paragraph 38 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development FundsAmendment198 for, 458 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.96 559 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 3 to recital F The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 440 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.96 558 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196790
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 12, after paragraph 22 — Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 196790, reference 2026/2797(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196790 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-196790,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 12, after paragraph 22 — Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196790}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196790},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196790, reference 2026/2797(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}