Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 9 — part 2, after paragraph 2

Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers

Vote
Amendment 9 — part 2, after paragraph 2
Result
210 for · 396 against · 1 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:32
More facts (6)
Position
vote 10 of 21 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots, EPP · split vote: S&D
Official label
B10-0390/2026 – After § 2 – Am 9/2
Vote id
196785
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 210 for, 396 against, 1 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 35 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “regrets that law enforcement officers are forced to confront organised criminal groups while lacking the means, resources and legal protection necessary to defend their own lives and those of others;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 1Against 34Abst. 0No vote 9 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 0Against 49Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 115Abst. 0No vote 20 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 3Against 62Abst. 0No vote 13 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 23Against 133Abst. 0No vote 28 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.78
ECRFor 73Against 0Abst. 0No vote 11 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 16Against 3Abst. 1No vote 8 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria050
Belgium040
Bulgaria020
Germany0130
Denmark020
Estonia020
Spain0170
Finland020
France0100
Greece020
Croatia030
Hungary020
Ireland010
Italy0170
Lithuania020
Luxembourg010
Latvia010
Malta020
Netherlands040
Poland030
Portugal080
Romania070
Sweden050

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 607 members

No vote recorded, 110

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 110 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 15 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote210 for, 417 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 33 %r · shared0.96 545 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 10 to paragraph 11 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment208 for, 382 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 35 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.95 587 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 48 to paragraph 20, point vii Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment238 for, 409 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.95 549 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2026Amendment 5 to recital E Ongoing persecution of Christians in Nigeria, notably the Kawel village massacreAmendment195 for, 391 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 519 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 99, adding text after recital 4 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment219 for, 439 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 584 voters
16 Sept 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 64 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureAmendment220 for, 432 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 588 voters
19 Jun 2025Amendment 31, adding text after recital D Clean Industrial DealAmendment183 for, 380 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.94 486 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 55 The European Water Resilience StrategyAmendment211 for, 410 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Members, Greensr · shared0.93 536 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 8 Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gearAmendment196 for, 367 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.93 502 voters
9 Jul 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 7 Draft amending budget No 1/2025: entering the surplus of the financial year 2024Amendment217 for, 430 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 569 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 9 — part 2, after paragraph 2 — Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 196785, reference 2026/2797(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196785 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-196785,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 9 — part 2, after paragraph 2 — Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196785}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196785},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196785, reference 2026/2797(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}