Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 7, after paragraph 1

Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers

Vote
Amendment 7, after paragraph 1
Result
181 for · 424 against · 6 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:31
More facts (6)
Position
vote 5 of 21 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Patriots
Official label
B10-0390/2026 – After § 1 – Am 7
Vote id
196779
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 181 for, 424 against, 6 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 30 % of the votes cast were for.

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 0Against 34Abst. 2No vote 8 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
GreensFor 0Against 48Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 115Abst. 0No vote 20 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 0Against 67Abst. 0No vote 11 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 9Against 146Abst. 0No vote 29 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.91
ECRFor 74Against 0Abst. 0No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
PatriotsFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 17Against 5Abst. 3No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.52
No groupFor 12Against 9Abst. 1No vote 6 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria600
Belgium300
Czechia500
Denmark100
Spain600
France2600
Greece100
Hungary700
Italy500
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Poland200
Portugal100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 611 members

No vote recorded, 106

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 106 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
18 May 2026Tuesday’s agenda — Request by the PfE Group — Terrorist attack in Modena Final vote Tuesday’s agenda – Request by the PfE Group – Terrorist attack in ModenaOther134 for, 309 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %r · shared0.94 393 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 56 Findings and recommendations of the Special Committee on the European Democracy ShieldAmendment201 for, 453 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %r · shared0.93 580 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 97 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment197 for, 433 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 543 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
20 May 2026Amendment 1, adding text after recital C Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment201 for, 438 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 557 voters
27 Apr 2026Wednesday’s agenda — Request by the ESN Group — Limiting EU legislation Final vote Wednesday’s agenda – Request by the ESN Group – Limiting EU legislationOther127 for, 338 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 27 %r · shared0.93 407 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 465 against, 2 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 575 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 1 Rule of law, fundamental rights and misuse of EU funds in Slovakia: the need for an EU responseAmendment193 for, 431 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 546 voters
26 Mar 2026Amendment 99 to Article 1 Simplification of the implementation of harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Digital Omnibus on AI)Amendment203 for, 426 against, 4 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.93 541 voters
16 Jun 2026Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 20 European political parties and foundations – 2026 report on the application of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 2025/2445 and on the activities fundedAmendment202 for, 463 against, 3 abstained Rejected For 30 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 576 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 3 to recital F The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basinsAmendment198 for, 440 against, 7 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.93 557 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 7, after paragraph 1 — Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 196779, reference 2026/2797(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196779 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-196779,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 7, after paragraph 1 — Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196779}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196779},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196779, reference 2026/2797(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}