Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Amendment 2 — part 1, after paragraph 1

Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers

Vote
Amendment 2 — part 1, after paragraph 1
Result
213 for · 394 against · 1 abstained Rejected · roll call
Date
17 September 2026, 13:31
More facts (6)
Position
vote 1 of 21 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: EPP · split vote: S&D
Official label
B10-0390/2026 – After § 1 – Am 2/1
Vote id
196776
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 213 for, 394 against, 1 abstained (roll call).

Rejected · 35 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘stresses that police and Guardia Civil officers on the front line against drug trafficking must have the necessary vessels, equipment, training, staff and legal protection to carry out their missions safely; calls on the Member States to reflect the high-risk nature of this work in the professional status and social protection of these officers;’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 2Against 34Abst. 0No vote 8 of 44Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
GreensFor 0Against 48Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 0Against 113Abst. 0No vote 22 of 135Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 1Against 65Abst. 0No vote 12 of 78Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
EPPFor 25Against 132Abst. 0No vote 27 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
ECRFor 73Against 1Abst. 0No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 68Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 84Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 25Against 0Abst. 0No vote 2 of 27Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 19Against 1Abst. 1No vote 7 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ESN members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Bulgaria300
Czechia100
Germany1300
France100
Hungary100
Italy100
Lithuania100
Poland200
Slovakia200

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 608 members

No vote recorded, 109

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 109 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 15 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote210 for, 417 against, 14 abstained Rejected For 33 %r · shared0.95 546 voters
7 May 2025Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 55 The European Water Resilience StrategyAmendment211 for, 410 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Members, Greensr · shared0.93 538 voters
15 Sept 2026Amendment 99, adding text after recital 4 Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: extension of its scope to downstream goods and anti-circumvention measuresAmendment219 for, 439 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.93 584 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 7 Draft amending budget No 1/2025: entering the surplus of the financial year 2024Amendment217 for, 430 against, 31 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 570 voters
16 Sept 2026Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 64 Hybrid warfare and the protection of the EU’s territorial integrity and critical security and defence infrastructureAmendment220 for, 432 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 33 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 589 voters
9 Oct 2025Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 3 Situation in Afghanistan: supporting women and communities affected by the recent earthquakesAmendment228 for, 367 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 37 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.92 523 voters
22 Oct 2025Amendment 110, adding text after paragraph 9 General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2026 – all sectionsAmendment201 for, 407 against, 38 abstained Rejected For 31 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 546 voters
29 Apr 2026Amendment 11 to paragraph 9 Discharge 2024: EU general budget – CommissionAmendment204 for, 423 against, 17 abstained Rejected For 32 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 550 voters
2 Apr 2025Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 52 Human rights and democracy in the world and the European Union’s policy on the matter – annual report 2024Amendment209 for, 287 against, 16 abstained Rejected For 41 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.91 428 voters
18 Dec 2025Amendment 3 to paragraph 8 Decarbonisation and modernisation of EU fisheries, and the development and deployment of fishing gearAmendment196 for, 367 against, 19 abstained Rejected For 34 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 504 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Amendment 2 — part 1, after paragraph 1 — Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers”. Vote, 17 September 2026. votingId 196776, reference 2026/2797(RSP). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196776 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 17 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-17/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-17-196776,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Amendment 2 — part 1, after paragraph 1 — Narco-trafficking in Europe’s waters: protecting our borders and supporting our law enforcement officers}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-17},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196776}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-17/196776},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196776, reference 2026/2797(RSP). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-17-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-17 (CC BY 4.0)}
}