Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital AC — part 2

Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

Vote
Recital AC — part 2
Decision
No. 18 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2026
Result
311 for · 309 against · 21 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:46
More facts (6)
Position
vote 93 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew · split vote: Members (A)
Official label
A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – Recital AC/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0200
Dossier
2025/2074(INI)
Vote id
196639
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 311 for, 309 against, 21 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 49 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “whereas many Member States provide only limited and unaffordable access to transition-related healthcare;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 1No vote 6 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
GreensFor 47Against 1Abst. 0No vote 5 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.97
S&DFor 125Against 0Abst. 1No vote 9 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 66Against 0Abst. 2No vote 10 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 26Against 128Abst. 3No vote 27 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
ECRFor 4Against 70Abst. 3No vote 7 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.86
PatriotsFor 0Against 73Abst. 4No vote 7 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 6Against 13Abst. 7No vote 2 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Cyprus100
Czechia010
Germany206
Spain010
France010
Greece310
Luxembourg010
Poland010
Romania010
Slovenia010
Slovakia051

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 641 members

No vote recorded, 76

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 76 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point g — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote255 for, 290 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 503 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 25 — part 2 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Amendment275 for, 331 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.89 549 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 56 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote271 for, 331 against, 24 abstained Rejected For 43 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.88 562 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 112 — part 3 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportSplit vote284 for, 335 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by EPP, S&Dr · shared0.88 563 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote273 for, 337 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.88 558 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital G — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote279 for, 238 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 51 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 491 voters
20 May 2026Amendment 10 to paragraph 1, point f Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblyAmendment299 for, 336 against, 9 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.87 582 voters
29 Apr 2026Citation 44 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote277 for, 342 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.87 562 voters
9 Jul 2025Request for urgent procedure Final vote European Climate LawProcedural300 for, 379 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 44 %r · shared0.87 606 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 571 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196639
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital AC — part 2 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196639, reference 2025/2074(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196639 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196639,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital AC — part 2 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196639}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196639},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196639, reference 2025/2074(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}