Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Recital J — part 2

Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

Vote
Recital J — part 2
Result
335 for · 279 against · 23 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:44
More facts (6)
Position
vote 82 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew · split vote: Members (A)
Official label
A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – Recital J/2
Vote id
196625
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 335 for, 279 against, 23 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 53 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “those words”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 37Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 119Against 0Abst. 0No vote 16 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 67Against 1Abst. 1No vote 9 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 54Against 91Abst. 14No vote 25 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.36
ECRFor 3Against 73Abst. 1No vote 7 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 0Against 76Abst. 0No vote 8 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 6Against 14Abst. 7No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1500
Denmark200
Spain400
Finland100
France500
Croatia100
Italy400
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands500
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 637 members

No vote recorded, 80

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 80 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 20 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote335 for, 281 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 568 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 102 The Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law reportSeparate vote291 for, 240 against, 74 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by EPPr · shared0.88 545 voters
13 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole Gender Equality Strategy 2025Final310 for, 222 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 52 %r · shared0.87 541 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 78 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote289 for, 304 against, 11 abstained Rejected For 48 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 547 voters
13 Nov 2025Recital D — part 3 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote289 for, 289 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 532 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 21 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote359 for, 218 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 568 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 16 — part 2 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote299 for, 270 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 49 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 544 voters
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on citation 16 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSeparate vote347 for, 257 against, 43 abstained Adopted For 54 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 576 voters
13 Nov 2025Separate vote on paragraph 73 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Separate vote279 for, 289 against, 42 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Renew, S&Dr · shared0.86 551 voters
18 Jun 2025Paragraph 99 — part 2 The Commission’s 2024 Rule of Law reportSplit vote297 for, 334 against, 22 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Membersr · shared0.85 570 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital J — part 2 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196625, reference 2025/2074(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196625 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196625,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital J — part 2 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196625}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196625},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196625, reference 2025/2074(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}