Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital J — part 1

Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

Vote
Recital J — part 1
Decision
No. 18 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2026
Result
509 for · 115 against · 17 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:44
More facts (6)
Position
vote 81 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew · split vote: Members (A)
Official label
A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – Recital J/1
Text
Report A-10-2026-0200
Dossier
2025/2074(INI)
Vote id
196624
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 509 for, 115 against, 17 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 79 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘transgender, non-binary and intersex people and’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 120Against 0Abst. 0No vote 15 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 70Against 0Abst. 0No vote 8 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 152Against 4Abst. 2No vote 26 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.94
ECRFor 13Against 61Abst. 1No vote 9 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.72
PatriotsFor 46Against 20Abst. 11No vote 7 of 84Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.40
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 18Against 6Abst. 3No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Cyprus100
Czechia200
Germany701
Spain010
France100
Greece220
Luxembourg001
Poland010
Romania001
Slovenia010
Slovakia510

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 641 members

No vote recorded, 76

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 76 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Separate vote on recital C The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSeparate vote456 for, 112 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.86 543 voters
19 Sept 2024Paragraph 4 — part 1 The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSplit vote429 for, 120 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.85 541 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point u — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote423 for, 108 against, 27 abstained Adopted For 76 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.84 500 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Sept 2026Paragraph 85 — part 1 Impact of social media and the online environment on young peopleSplit vote449 for, 100 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 73 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.83 580 voters
20 May 2026Citation 5 — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote467 for, 151 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.82 588 voters
9 Jul 2025Paragraph 24 — part 3 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSplit vote529 for, 105 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 78 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.82 601 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point m — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote457 for, 153 against, 36 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.82 584 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital M — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote406 for, 122 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.82 489 voters
9 Jul 2025Separate vote on paragraph 48 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSeparate vote465 for, 118 against, 73 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.82 589 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point aq — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote455 for, 152 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.82 585 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196624
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital J — part 1 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196624, reference 2025/2074(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196624 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196624,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital J — part 1 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196624}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196624},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196624, reference 2025/2074(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}