Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Recital B — part 2

Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

Vote
Recital B — part 2
Decision
No. 18 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2026
Result
411 for · 213 against · 21 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:43
More facts (6)
Position
vote 75 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew · split vote: Members (A)
Official label
A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – Recital B/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0200
Dossier
2025/2074(INI)
Vote id
196615
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 411 for, 213 against, 21 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 64 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘whereas an intersectional approach to women’s health is therefore essential;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 127Against 1Abst. 1No vote 6 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 64Against 2Abst. 1No vote 11 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 119Against 23Abst. 16No vote 26 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.63
ECRFor 4Against 73Abst. 1No vote 6 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.90
PatriotsFor 0Against 77Abst. 0No vote 7 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 10Against 14Abst. 2No vote 2 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

EPP members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria401
Belgium300
Bulgaria303
Cyprus200
Czechia210
Germany2421
Denmark110
Estonia100
Spain1900
Finland200
France031
Greece700
Croatia113
Hungary600
Ireland100
Italy511
Lithuania120
Luxembourg200
Latvia200
Malta200
Netherlands310
Poland1614
Portugal412
Romania610
Sweden140
Slovenia130
Slovakia010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 645 members

No vote recorded, 72

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 72 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 78 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote396 for, 182 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 550 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BE — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote408 for, 209 against, 11 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.88 563 voters
19 Sept 2024Paragraph 4 — part 2 The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSplit vote416 for, 170 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.88 529 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 27 — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote411 for, 209 against, 10 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.88 563 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 54 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote414 for, 195 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESNr · shared0.88 569 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point r — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote386 for, 165 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 509 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BK Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote418 for, 190 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 568 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BE — part 3 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote411 for, 207 against, 14 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.88 567 voters
25 Nov 2025Recital BD — part 2 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote416 for, 202 against, 12 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.87 563 voters
7 May 2025Paragraph 51 — part 2 2023 and 2024 reports on TürkiyeSplit vote426 for, 192 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.87 555 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196615
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Recital B — part 2 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196615, reference 2025/2074(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196615 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196615,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Recital B — part 2 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196615}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196615},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196615, reference 2025/2074(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}