Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 63 — part 3

Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

Vote
Paragraph 63 — part 3
Result
351 for · 272 against · 28 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:42
More facts (6)
Position
vote 73 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Members (B), Renew · split vote: Members (A), Members (B)
Official label
A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 63/3
Vote id
196612
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 351 for, 272 against, 28 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 54 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘calls for their role to be explicitly acknowledged, in the upcoming European Competitiveness Fund and AgoraEU programme, through the earmarking of sufficient levels of funding for civil society organisations working on gender equality and SRHR in both programmes; expresses concern about the shrinking civic space and the decrease in funding available for civil society organisations working on women’s health and rights across the EU; strongly condemns the Commission’s decision to unexpectedly cut funding, including operating grants for health civil society organisations, in the EU4Health programme, and urges the Commission to immediately reinstate adequate funding for these health non-governmental organisations;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 39Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 130Against 0Abst. 0No vote 5 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 61Against 4Abst. 4No vote 9 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
EPPFor 67Against 81Abst. 14No vote 22 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.25
ECRFor 0Against 74Abst. 1No vote 9 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.98
PatriotsFor 0Against 76Abst. 0No vote 8 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 4Against 14Abst. 9No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1500
Denmark200
Spain400
Finland100
France500
Croatia100
Italy400
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Sweden300
Slovenia100

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 651 members

No vote recorded, 66

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 66 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Dec 2025Separate vote on recital S European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’Separate vote348 for, 227 against, 61 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by Renew, Greens, S&Dr · shared0.90 573 voters
13 Nov 2025Final vote — text as a whole Gender Equality Strategy 2025Final310 for, 222 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 52 %r · shared0.88 544 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 20 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote335 for, 281 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 52 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 579 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
17 Dec 2025Separate vote on recital K European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’Separate vote354 for, 237 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 55 %Requested by ECR, Renew, Greens, S&Dr · shared0.87 581 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AZ — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote351 for, 204 against, 59 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.87 556 voters
17 Dec 2025Paragraph 2 — part 2 European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’Split vote364 for, 207 against, 64 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by Renew, Greens, S&Dr · shared0.85 573 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 21 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote359 for, 218 against, 62 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 579 voters
21 May 2026Separate vote on paragraph 53 Advancing towards a care society: addressing the gender care gapSeparate vote248 for, 158 against, 114 abstained Adopted For 48 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 474 voters
17 Dec 2025Final vote — text as a whole (B10-0558/2025) European Citizens’ Initiative ‘My voice, my choice: for safe and accessible abortion’Final358 for, 202 against, 79 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by Renew, Greens, S&Dr · shared0.85 575 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 25 — part 2 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote361 for, 218 against, 60 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.85 579 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 63 — part 3 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196612, reference 2025/2074(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196612 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196612,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 63 — part 3 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196612}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196612},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196612, reference 2025/2074(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}