Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 63 — part 1

Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

Vote
Paragraph 63 — part 1
Result
460 for · 129 against · 64 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:42
More facts (6)
Position
vote 71 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew · split vote: Members (A), Members (B)
Official label
A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 63/1
Vote id
196610
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 460 for, 129 against, 64 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 70 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘Emphasises the critical role of civil society organisations in providing needs-based, community-level and peer-to-peer healthcare services, particularly for women facing poverty, discrimination or social exclusion; stresses that these organisations act as a bridge between patients and public institutions, and also work to advance gender equality and SRHR, collect data on women’s health experiences and needs, prevent online health scams, and contribute to ensuring more gender-inclusive laws and policies in the field of healthcare;’ without the words ‘and SRHR’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 128Against 0Abst. 0No vote 7 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 69Against 0Abst. 0No vote 9 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
EPPFor 154Against 6Abst. 2No vote 22 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
ECRFor 5Against 67Abst. 4No vote 8 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.82
PatriotsFor 0Against 22Abst. 55No vote 7 of 84Majority line AbstainedClear line Abstained Cohesion 0.57
ESNFor 0Against 24Abst. 0No vote 3 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 14Against 10Abst. 3No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium003
Czechia005
Denmark001
Spain060
France0028
Greece010
Hungary0010
Italy007
Latvia001
Netherlands060
Poland020
Portugal010

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 653 members

No vote recorded, 64

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 64 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 1 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote410 for, 119 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.90 525 voters
19 Sept 2024Paragraph 4 — part 1 The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSplit vote429 for, 120 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.90 545 voters
20 May 2026Citation 5 — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote467 for, 151 against, 32 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.90 598 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote373 for, 139 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.89 510 voters
17 Sept 2026Final vote — text as a whole Strengthening global health resilience in partner countriesFinal319 for, 142 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.89 463 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point m — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote457 for, 153 against, 36 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.89 594 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point aq — part 2 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote455 for, 152 against, 39 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.89 594 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 55 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote432 for, 137 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.88 556 voters
29 Apr 2026Separate vote on recital AQ Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Separate vote423 for, 185 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 568 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote424 for, 188 against, 15 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.88 567 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 63 — part 1 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196610, reference 2025/2074(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196610 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196610,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 63 — part 1 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196610}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196610},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196610, reference 2025/2074(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}