Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 62 — part 2

Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

Vote
Paragraph 62 — part 2
Decision
No. 18 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2026
Result
446 for · 138 against · 59 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:42
More facts (6)
Position
vote 69 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew · split vote: Members (A)
Official label
A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 62/2
Text
Report A-10-2026-0200
Dossier
2025/2074(INI)
Vote id
196607
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 446 for, 138 against, 59 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 69 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: ‘calls on the Commission to prioritise earmarked funding under the new European Competitiveness Fund and Horizon Europe 2028-2034 (FP10) for research into women’s health;’

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 129Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
RenewFor 62Against 0Abst. 8No vote 8 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.83
EPPFor 126Against 7Abst. 24No vote 27 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.70
ECRFor 2Against 73Abst. 1No vote 8 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.94
PatriotsFor 30Against 28Abst. 16No vote 10 of 84Majority line ForClear line Divided Cohesion 0.11
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 8Against 7Abst. 10No vote 3 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

ECR members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Belgium020
Bulgaria210
Czechia031
Denmark010
Estonia010
Spain020
Finland010
France040
Greece020
Croatia010
Italy0210
Lithuania020
Latvia030
Netherlands030
Poland0170
Romania060
Sweden030

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 643 members

No vote recorded, 74

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 74 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Sept 2024Separate vote on recital C The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSeparate vote456 for, 112 against, 38 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.88 539 voters
28 Apr 2026Recital AJ — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote468 for, 129 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 72 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 583 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital M — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote406 for, 122 against, 19 abstained Adopted For 74 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 484 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Sept 2025Recital E — part 3 of 3 Public procurementSplit vote481 for, 157 against, 4 abstained Adopted For 75 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.86 569 voters
30 Apr 2026Final vote — text as a whole Women’s entrepreneurship in rural and island areas and outermost regionsFinal404 for, 102 against, 67 abstained Adopted For 71 %r · shared0.86 513 voters
12 Feb 2026Final vote — text as a whole Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenFinal340 for, 141 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.85 490 voters
19 Sept 2024Paragraph 4 — part 1 The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate changeSplit vote429 for, 120 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.85 539 voters
11 Mar 2026Final vote — text as a whole Gender pay and pension gap in the EU: state of play, challenges and the way forward, and developing guidelines for the better evaluation and fairer remuneration of work in female-dominated sectorsFinal458 for, 72 against, 98 abstained Adopted For 73 %r · shared0.84 558 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point s — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote392 for, 153 against, 18 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.84 499 voters
20 May 2026Paragraph 1, point m — part 3 Recommendation on the 81st session of the United Nations General AssemblySplit vote457 for, 153 against, 36 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.84 585 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196607
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 62 — part 2 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196607, reference 2025/2074(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196607 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196607,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 62 — part 2 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196607}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196607},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196607, reference 2025/2074(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}