Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 62 — part 1

Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

Vote: Paragraph 62 — part 1
Decision: No. 18 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2026
Result: 450 for · 168 against · 37 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date: 16 September 2026, 14:41

More facts (6)

Position: vote 68 of 98 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Renew · split vote: Members (A)
Official label: A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 62/1
Text: Report A-10-2026-0200
Dossier: 2025/2074(INI)
Vote id: 196606

Position: vote 68 of 98 on the decision
Requested by: roll call: Renew · split vote: Members (A)
Official label: A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 62/1
Text: Report A-10-2026-0200
Dossier: 2025/2074(INI)
Vote id: 196606

Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP)

Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Adopted · 69 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘calls on the Commission to prioritise earmarked funding under the new European Competitiveness Fund and Horizon Europe 2028-2034 (FP10) for research into women’s health;’ and ‘ring-fenced’”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. **No vote**: in office that day, no position recorded. **Majority line**: the most common position. **Clear line**: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. **Cohesion**: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
Group	For	Against	Abst.	No vote	Majority line	Clear line	Cohesion
The Left	For 40	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 4 of 44	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Greens	For 50	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 3 of 53	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
S&D	For 128	Against 0	Abst. 0	No vote 7 of 135	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 1.00
Renew	For 63	Against 0	Abst. 7	No vote 8 of 78	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.85
EPP	For 153	Against 7	Abst. 2	No vote 22 of 184	Majority line For	Clear line For	Cohesion 0.92
ECR	For 6	Against 65	Abst. 6	No vote 7 of 84	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.77
Patriots	For 0	Against 62	Abst. 15	No vote 7 of 84	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 0.71
ESN	For 0	Against 24	Abst. 0	No vote 3 of 27	Majority line Against	Clear line Against	Cohesion 1.00
No group	For 10	Against 10	Abst. 7	No vote 1 of 28	Majority line —	Clear line No line	Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Each cell: members of that country in that group who voted for – against – abstained (group at the date of the vote). Shading: the share of the cell's votes that were for; the stronger the shading, the more for (scale below). — : no member voted.
Country	The Left	Greens	S&D	Renew	EPP	ECR	Patriots	ESN	No group
Austria	no member voted	2–0–0	5–0–0	2–0–0	5–0–0	no member voted	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Belgium	2–0–0	2–0–0	4–0–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	0–0–2	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted
Bulgaria	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	2–0–0	6–0–0	2–1–0	no member voted	0–3–0	no member voted
Cyprus	1–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	1–0–0
Czechia	no member voted	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	4–0–0	0–3–1	0–1–4	no member voted	1–1–0
Germany	2–0–0	15–0–0	14–0–0	9–0–0	29–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–13–0	2–0–6
Denmark	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	4–0–0	1–0–1	0–1–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Estonia	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Spain	3–0–0	4–0–0	19–0–0	1–0–0	19–0–0	0–2–0	0–6–0	no member voted	0–1–0
Finland	3–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	2–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
France	8–0–0	5–0–0	13–0–0	11–0–0	4–0–0	4–0–0	0–28–0	0–1–0	1–0–0
Greece	3–0–0	no member voted	4–0–0	no member voted	7–0–0	0–2–0	0–0–1	no member voted	1–2–1
Croatia	no member voted	1–0–0	3–0–0	no member voted	4–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Hungary	no member voted	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	6–0–0	no member voted	0–0–10	0–1–0	no member voted
Ireland	3–0–0	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–1	1–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Italy	9–0–0	4–0–0	19–0–0	2–0–0	6–1–0	0–21–0	0–7–0	0–1–0	no member voted
Lithuania	no member voted	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–0–0	3–0–0	0–2–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted
Luxembourg	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Latvia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	0–2–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Malta	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	no member voted	2–0–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Netherlands	1–0–0	6–0–0	4–0–0	3–0–4	4–0–0	0–1–2	0–6–0	no member voted	no member voted
Poland	no member voted	no member voted	3–0–0	1–0–0	19–1–1	0–18–0	0–2–0	0–2–0	0–1–0
Portugal	2–0–0	no member voted	7–0–0	0–0–2	7–0–0	no member voted	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted
Romania	no member voted	no member voted	8–0–0	3–0–0	8–0–0	0–5–1	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Sweden	2–0–0	3–0–0	5–0–0	3–0–0	4–1–0	0–3–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted
Slovenia	no member voted	1–0–0	1–0–0	2–0–0	2–2–0	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	0–1–0
Slovakia	no member voted	no member voted	no member voted	6–0–0	0–1–0	no member voted	no member voted	0–2–0	4–2–0

Share for: 0–19 %20–39 %40–59 %60–79 %80–100 %

S&D members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
Country	For	Against	Abst.	Bar
Austria	5	0	0
Belgium	4	0	0
Bulgaria	2	0	0
Cyprus	1	0	0
Germany	14	0	0
Denmark	2	0	0
Estonia	2	0	0
Spain	19	0	0
Finland	2	0	0
France	13	0	0
Greece	4	0	0
Croatia	3	0	0
Hungary	2	0	0
Ireland	1	0	0
Italy	19	0	0
Lithuania	2	0	0
Luxembourg	1	0	0
Latvia	1	0	0
Malta	3	0	0
Netherlands	4	0	0
Poland	3	0	0
Portugal	7	0	0
Romania	8	0	0
Sweden	5	0	0
Slovenia	1	0	0

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 655 members

No vote recorded, 62

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 62 members

Name · group that day · country

Adina VĂLEAN group that day: EPP · Romania
António TÂNGER CORRÊA group that day: Patriots · Portugal
Barry COWEN group that day: Renew · Ireland
Bruno GONÇALVES group that day: S&D · Portugal
Céline IMART group that day: EPP · France
Charles GOERENS group that day: Renew · Luxembourg
Christophe BAY group that day: Patriots · France
Ciaran MULLOOLY group that day: Renew · Ireland
Claudiu MANDA group that day: S&D · Romania
Cynthia NÍ MHURCHÚ group that day: Renew · Ireland
Damien CARÊME group that day: The Left · France
Dominik TARCZYŃSKI group that day: ECR · Poland
Elżbieta Katarzyna ŁUKACIJEWSKA group that day: EPP · Poland
Esteban GONZÁLEZ PONS group that day: EPP · Spain
Ewa ZAJĄCZKOWSKA-HERNIK group that day: Patriots · Poland
Francesco VENTOLA group that day: ECR · Italy
Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO group that day: EPP · Italy
Gabriela FIREA group that day: S&D · Romania
Gabriella GERZSENYI group that day: EPP · Hungary
Giuseppe MILAZZO group that day: ECR · Italy
Hans NEUHOFF group that day: ESN · Germany
Hristo PETROV group that day: Renew · Bulgaria
Isabel BENJUMEA BENJUMEA group that day: EPP · Spain
Isabel SERRA SÁNCHEZ group that day: The Left · Spain
Ivan DAVID group that day: ESN · Czechia
Jan FARSKÝ group that day: EPP · Czechia
Janusz LEWANDOWSKI group that day: EPP · Poland
Jaroslav KNOT group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Javier ZARZALEJOS group that day: EPP · Spain
Johan VAN OVERTVELDT group that day: ECR · Belgium
Karlo RESSLER group that day: EPP · Croatia
Kira Marie PETER-HANSEN group that day: Greens · Denmark
Klara DOSTALOVA group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Laurent CASTILLO group that day: Patriots · France
Luis-Vicențiu LAZARUS group that day: No group · Romania
Marco FALCONE group that day: EPP · Italy
Marcos ROS SEMPERE group that day: S&D · Spain
Maria WALSH group that day: EPP · Ireland
Marianne VIND group that day: S&D · Denmark
Mario MANTOVANI group that day: ECR · Italy
Marko VEŠLIGAJ group that day: S&D · Croatia
Mary KHAN group that day: ESN · Germany
Mimmo LUCANO group that day: The Left · Italy
Mircea-Gheorghe HAVA group that day: EPP · Romania
Nicolae ȘTEFĂNUȚĂ group that day: Greens · Romania
Nina CARBERRY group that day: EPP · Ireland
Ondřej KNOTEK group that day: Patriots · Czechia
Özlem DEMIREL group that day: The Left · Germany
Pekka TOVERI group that day: EPP · Finland
Piotr MÜLLER group that day: ECR · Poland
Regina DOHERTY group that day: EPP · Ireland
Riho TERRAS group that day: EPP · Estonia
Roberta METSOLA group that day: EPP · Malta
Roberts ZĪLE group that day: ECR · Latvia
Sandro GOZI group that day: Renew · France
Sirpa PIETIKÄINEN group that day: EPP · Finland
Stéphanie YON-COURTIN group that day: Renew · France
Sven SIMON group that day: EPP · Germany
Tomislav SOKOL group that day: EPP · Croatia
Urmas PAET group that day: Renew · Estonia
Vasile DÎNCU group that day: S&D · Romania
Ville NIINISTÖ group that day: Greens · Finland

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
23 Oct 2025	Separate vote on paragraph 3 UN Climate Change Conference 2025 in Belém, Brazil (COP30)	Separate vote	383 for, 170 against, 18 abstained Adopted	For 67 %	Requested by ESN	r · shared0.92 522 voters
10 Mar 2026	Paragraph 17 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing	Split vote	440 for, 156 against, 25 abstained Adopted	For 71 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.91 563 voters
22 Jan 2026	Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 3 European technological sovereignty and digital infrastructure	Amendment	426 for, 180 against, 24 abstained Adopted	For 68 %	Requested by Patriots, Renew	r · shared0.91 572 voters

Show 7 more

**Result**: for–against–abstained. **For**: share of the votes cast. **Requested by**: the groups that asked for a roll call.
Date	Vote	Kind	Result	For	Requested by	r · shared
29 Apr 2026	Final vote — text as a whole Monitoring the application of European Union law in 2023, 2024 and 2025	Final	416 for, 190 against, 15 abstained Adopted	For 67 %		r · shared0.91 567 voters
29 Apr 2026	Paragraph 67 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Split vote	418 for, 197 against, 12 abstained Adopted	For 67 %	Requested by Greens, Patriots	r · shared0.91 569 voters
29 Apr 2026	Separate vote on paragraph 92 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Separate vote	427 for, 195 against, 15 abstained Adopted	For 67 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.91 579 voters
10 Mar 2026	Paragraph 34 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housing	Split vote	449 for, 163 against, 13 abstained Adopted	For 72 %	Requested by Patriots	r · shared0.91 567 voters
19 Sept 2024	Paragraph 4 — part 2 The devastating floods in central and eastern Europe, the loss of lives and the EU’s preparedness to act on such disasters exacerbated by climate change	Split vote	416 for, 170 against, 7 abstained Adopted	For 70 %	Requested by ECR	r · shared0.91 536 voters
22 Jan 2026	Recital P — part 1 Attempted takeover of Lithuania’s public broadcaster and the threat to democracy in Lithuania	Split vote	419 for, 158 against, 25 abstained Adopted	For 70 %	Requested by Renew	r · shared0.91 548 voters
29 Apr 2026	Separate vote on recital AQ Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025	Separate vote	423 for, 185 against, 18 abstained Adopted	For 68 %	Requested by Greens	r · shared0.90 571 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Another vote on this decision

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Decision Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions Resolution · report by Billy Kelleher 16 Sept 2026 Adopted

Other votes on this decision

Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Paragraph 3 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Paragraph 3 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Paragraph 6 — part 4 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Paragraph 6 — part 5 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 6 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Paragraph 8 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Paragraph 8 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Paragraph 8 — part 3 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Paragraph 16 — part 1 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026
Vote Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions — Paragraph 16 — part 2 Roll-call vote · 16 Sept 2026 16 Sept 2026

See all

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink: https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196606
Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament)
Data source: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved: 25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 62 — part 1 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196606, reference 2025/2074(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196606 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).

BibTeX

@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196606,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 62 — part 1 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196606}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196606},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196606, reference 2025/2074(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}