Skip to content
EU Parl WatchResearch
Projects

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 48 — part 3

Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

Vote
Paragraph 48 — part 3
Decision
No. 18 of the sitting of 16 Sept 2026
Result
322 for · 313 against · 19 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:40
More facts (6)
Position
vote 62 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew · split vote: Members (A)
Official label
A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 48/3
Text
Report A-10-2026-0200
Dossier
2025/2074(INI)
Vote id
196599
More
Cite this page

The members file includes members in office who did not vote.

Roll-call results (EP) (opens the official site)
Link to this page

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 322 for, 313 against, 19 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 49 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “free or”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 49Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 129Against 0Abst. 2No vote 4 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 65Against 2Abst. 3No vote 8 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.89
EPPFor 20Against 134Abst. 5No vote 25 of 184Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.76
ECRFor 2Against 74Abst. 2No vote 6 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
PatriotsFor 0Against 73Abst. 4No vote 7 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.92
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 17Against 7Abst. 3No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Greens members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria200
Belgium200
Czechia100
Germany1500
Denmark200
Spain400
Finland100
France500
Croatia100
Italy400
Lithuania100
Luxembourg100
Latvia100
Netherlands600
Sweden300

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 654 members

No vote recorded, 63

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 63 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point aa — part 4 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote243 for, 303 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 502 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point aa — part 3 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote251 for, 296 against, 8 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.93 503 voters
12 Feb 2026Recital O — part 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote269 for, 302 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.93 521 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 2 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote274 for, 298 against, 10 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.92 528 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point g — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote255 for, 290 against, 20 abstained Rejected For 45 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.92 511 voters
29 Apr 2026Paragraph 101 — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote293 for, 343 against, 6 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.92 584 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AP — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote273 for, 337 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 44 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.91 565 voters
19 Dec 2024Paragraph 1, point ae — part 2 Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote264 for, 292 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 47 %Requested by Greens, Patriots, ECRr · shared0.91 507 voters
17 Sept 2026Amendment 51, adding text after paragraph 10 The recent hybrid attacks and instrumentalisation of migrants in Ceuta and the need for a coordinated response to protect EU’s external bordersAmendment277 for, 321 against, 5 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 577 voters
28 Apr 2026Amendments 1 + 25 (voted as one), adding text after citation 21 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2024Amendment301 for, 335 against, 12 abstained Rejected For 46 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.91 589 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Permalink
https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196599
Official sources
Data source
Licensed CC BY 4.0.
Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 48 — part 3 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196599, reference 2025/2074(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196599 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX 
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196599,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 48 — part 3 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196599}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196599},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196599, reference 2025/2074(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}