Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 48 — part 2

Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

Vote
Paragraph 48 — part 2
Result
409 for · 150 against · 79 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:40
More facts (6)
Position
vote 61 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew · split vote: Members (A)
Official label
A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 48/2
Vote id
196598
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 409 for, 150 against, 79 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 64 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure access for all to affordable, high-quality, toxin-free and environmentally sustainable – particularly reusable – menstrual products;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 38Against 0Abst. 0No vote 6 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 127Against 0Abst. 2No vote 6 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.98
RenewFor 68Against 2Abst. 0No vote 8 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.96
EPPFor 107Against 9Abst. 34No vote 34 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.57
ECRFor 2Against 71Abst. 4No vote 7 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.88
PatriotsFor 0Against 41Abst. 33No vote 10 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Divided Cohesion 0.33
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 17Against 4Abst. 6No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

Patriots members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Austria060
Belgium030
Czechia005
Denmark010
Spain060
France0027
Greece010
Hungary090
Italy070
Netherlands060
Poland020
Portugal001

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 638 members

No vote recorded, 79

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 79 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
19 Dec 2024Final vote on the motion for a resolution Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenFinal322 for, 163 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 61 %r · shared0.88 470 voters
12 Feb 2026Final vote — text as a whole Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenFinal340 for, 141 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 62 %r · shared0.88 489 voters
20 Jan 2026Final vote — text as a whole Humanitarian aid in a time of polycrisis – reaffirming our principles for a more effective and ambitious response to humanitarian crisesFinal444 for, 153 against, 55 abstained Adopted For 68 %r · shared0.88 576 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
21 Jan 2026Paragraph 14 — part 3 Implementation of the common foreign and security policy – annual report 2025Split vote467 for, 150 against, 45 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.87 584 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point r — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote386 for, 165 against, 17 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.87 503 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 4 — part 1 Developing a new EU anti-poverty strategySplit vote410 for, 119 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 70 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 516 voters
12 Feb 2026Paragraph 1, point q — part 1 Recommendation to the Council on EU priorities for the 70th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenSplit vote373 for, 139 against, 53 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 502 voters
28 Apr 2026Paragraph 21 — part 1 Importance of consent-based rape legislation in the EUSplit vote444 for, 152 against, 54 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.86 579 voters
28 Apr 2026Separate vote on paragraph 51 Interim report on the proposal for the multiannual financial framework for 2028-2034Separate vote436 for, 154 against, 68 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ECRr · shared0.86 584 voters
10 Mar 2026Paragraph 55 — part 2 Housing crisis in the European Union with the aim of proposing solutions for decent, sustainable and affordable housingSplit vote432 for, 137 against, 41 abstained Adopted For 71 %Requested by Patriotsr · shared0.86 542 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 48 — part 2 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196598, reference 2025/2074(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196598 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196598,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 48 — part 2 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196598}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196598},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196598, reference 2025/2074(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}