Skip to content

Vote · Roll call

Paragraph 46 — part 2

Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions

Vote
Paragraph 46 — part 2
Result
406 for · 214 against · 29 abstained Adopted · roll call
Date
16 September 2026, 14:40
More facts (6)
Position
vote 59 of 98 on the decision
Requested by
roll call: Renew · split vote: Members (A)
Official label
A10-0200/2026 – Billy Kelleher – § 46/2
Vote id
196595
More

Result

The vote as recorded by name.

Result: 406 for, 214 against, 29 abstained (roll call).

Adopted · 63 % of the votes cast were for.

Part voted on: “calls on the Commission to issue clear guidelines to the Member States on the provision of comprehensive age-appropriate sexuality and relationship education, in line with international standards;”

Groups

Members' votes, each counted in the group they belonged to on the day. No vote: in office that day, no position recorded. Majority line: the most common position. Clear line: a position with at least two thirds of the group's votes (at least 10 members voting), otherwise Divided. Cohesion: Agreement Index, 0 = evenly split, 1 = all voted the same (method).
GroupForAgainstAbst.No voteMajority lineClear lineCohesionBar
The LeftFor 40Against 0Abst. 0No vote 4 of 44Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
GreensFor 50Against 0Abst. 0No vote 3 of 53Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 1.00
S&DFor 128Against 1Abst. 0No vote 6 of 135Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.99
RenewFor 66Against 1Abst. 2No vote 9 of 78Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.93
EPPFor 110Against 24Abst. 25No vote 25 of 184Majority line ForClear line For Cohesion 0.54
ECRFor 2Against 73Abst. 0No vote 9 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 0.96
PatriotsFor 0Against 77Abst. 0No vote 7 of 84Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
ESNFor 0Against 23Abst. 0No vote 4 of 27Majority line AgainstClear line Against Cohesion 1.00
No groupFor 10Against 15Abst. 2No vote 1 of 28Majority line —Clear line No line Cohesion —

Countries × groups

How each country’s members of each group voted.

No group members by country who voted for, against or abstained (group at the date of the vote).
CountryForAgainstAbst.Bar
Cyprus100
Czechia020
Germany701
Spain010
France010
Greece220
Luxembourg010
Poland010
Romania010
Slovenia010
Slovakia051

Members

Each member’s recorded position, in the group they sat in that day. Filter by country, group, position or name.

Show all 649 members

No vote recorded, 68

Members in office that day without a recorded position. No vote recorded is not the same as absent: leave, illness or chairing the sitting look the same.

Show the 68 members

Name · group that day · country

Similar votes

Roll calls that split the chamber the most similarly: r is the correlation of members’ positions, over the members who voted in both. Other votes on the same decision are left out.

Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
29 Apr 2026Recital AZ — part 1 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote351 for, 204 against, 59 abstained Adopted For 57 %Requested by Greensr · shared0.90 558 voters
19 Dec 2024Final vote on the motion for a resolution Recommendation to the Council on the EU priorities for the 69th session of the UN Commission on the Status of WomenFinal322 for, 163 against, 46 abstained Adopted For 61 %r · shared0.90 479 voters
29 Apr 2026Recital AZ — part 2 Situation of fundamental rights in the European Union in 2024 and 2025Split vote344 for, 216 against, 49 abstained Adopted For 56 %Requested by Greens, EPPr · shared0.89 555 voters
Show 7 more
Result: for–against–abstained. For: share of the votes cast. Requested by: the groups that asked for a roll call.
DateVoteKindResultForRequested byr · shared
9 Jul 2025Final vote — text as a whole Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumFinal422 for, 219 against, 31 abstained Adopted For 63 %r · shared0.89 603 voters
13 Nov 2025Paragraph 72 — part 1 Gender Equality Strategy 2025Split vote396 for, 183 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 65 %Requested by Renewr · shared0.89 549 voters
25 Nov 2025Paragraph 27 — part 1 Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSplit vote418 for, 183 against, 29 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by ESN, S&Dr · shared0.88 570 voters
9 Jul 2025Separate vote on paragraph 47 Implementation and delivery of the Sustainable Development Goals in view of the 2025 High-Level Political ForumSeparate vote449 for, 191 against, 28 abstained Adopted For 67 %Requested by The Left, S&Dr · shared0.88 600 voters
14 Nov 2024Final vote — text as a whole UN Climate Change Conference 2024 in Baku, Azerbaijan (COP29)Final429 for, 183 against, 24 abstained Adopted For 67 %r · shared0.88 562 voters
16 Jun 2026Paragraph 11 — part 2 Reinforcing development cooperation to address irregular population movements and their root causes in partner countriesSplit vote455 for, 211 against, 7 abstained Adopted For 68 %Requested by Members (a)r · shared0.88 615 voters
25 Nov 2025Separate vote on recital BK Existence of a clear risk of a serious breach by Hungary of the values on which the Union is foundedSeparate vote418 for, 190 against, 26 abstained Adopted For 66 %Requested by S&Dr · shared0.88 571 voters

How similarity is measured

Compare with another vote

Groups’ lines side by side, and the members who switched between the two votes.

Connections

This vote’s decision, the other votes on it, and related votes.

Show 11 connections: The decision · Other votes on this decision

The decision

Other votes on this decision

See all: Other votes on this decision

Sources & citation

Where the facts on this page come from, and how to cite it.

Retrieved
25 September 2026

Cite as

European Parliament (2026). “Paragraph 46 — part 2 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions”. Vote, 16 September 2026. votingId 196595, reference 2025/2074(INI). EU Parl Watch Research. https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196595 (retrieved 25 September 2026). Official sources: Roll-call votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV_EN.html; Results of votes, sitting of 16 September 2026 (European Parliament), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16, https://data.europarl.europa.eu/api/v2/meetings/MTG-PL-2026-09-16/vote-results?format=application%2Fld%2Bjson (CC BY 4.0).
BibTeX
@misc{epw-vote-2026-09-16-196595,
  author = {{European Parliament}},
  title = {{Paragraph 46 — part 2 — Gender inequalities in health, specifically as regards gender-specific conditions}},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-09-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196595}},
  url = {https://news.eu-parl.st-solutions.dev/votes/2026-09-16/196595},
  urldate = {2026-09-25},
  publisher = {EU Parl Watch Research},
  note = {Vote. votingId 196595, reference 2025/2074(INI). Official source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-RCV\_EN.html, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/PV-10-2026-09-16-VOT\_EN.html. Data: EP Open Data API: vote results of the sitting MTG-PL-2026-09-16 (CC BY 4.0)}
}